Re: logical laws of Nature

On Jan 22, 2:45 pm, N <n.m.ke...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 19 Jan, 15:32, "Alpha" <OmegaZero2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



"Kowdlar" <elu...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:fmsffv$nu2$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Uzytkownik "N" <n.m.ke...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisal w wiadomosci
news:04b9fb84-c5d3-4bab-92c3-56f502eb53e7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I don't know very much physics, but its really interesting
to read:)

Ok,Ok. I resume my example. An electron revolving around the nucleus may

Electrons always seemed like a cloudy idea to me.

capture an incident photon.Once that occurs, the electron is raised to a
higer energy level and thus changes its orbit to a one with largr radius.
While being in the exited state, the electron reemits the photon after
some time, but nobody knows when( then effect may be 1 or may be 0, it
means exist or not), and returns to the ground state. We have (0 ==> 1) or
( 1 ==>1) and it is true.
K.
--
felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

yeh!

I'll drink to that.
.