Re: Innoivationm and the Curse of Knowledge, etc
- From: casey <jgkjcasey@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:44:20 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 1, 2:06 am, "Glen M. Sizemore" <gmsizemo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JC: To me the behaviorists were not studying
animals "in all their complexity" but rather
restricting the environment and selecting
a set variables such as lever pushing with
lights, bells, food, over time, to _simplify_
the system they were studying.
GS: You don't really know much about the way
experimental science works, do you?
Not a very helpful response Glen.
Some people who claim to be experimental scientists
like Steven Rose seem to have a low opinion of the
work done by people who call themselves behaviorists.
But no, I am not an experimental scientist, although
I see playing around with programs as a form of
experimenting. I imagine in science an experiment
is used to support or refute some theory.
--
JC
.
- References:
- Innoivationm and the Curse of Knowledge, etc
- From: Wolf K.
- Re: Innoivationm and the Curse of Knowledge, etc
- From: casey
- Re: Innoivationm and the Curse of Knowledge, etc
- From: Glen M. Sizemore
- Innoivationm and the Curse of Knowledge, etc
- Prev by Date: Re: Innoivationm and the Curse of Knowledge, etc
- Next by Date: Re: Innoivationm and the Curse of Knowledge, etc
- Previous by thread: Re: Innoivationm and the Curse of Knowledge, etc
- Index(es):