Re: Why didn't at least one dinosaur species become human-level smart?
- From: "zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 09:09:41 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 2, 11:07 pm, STJensen <RecreationalPo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The dinosaurs had hundreds of millions of years where they ruled the
Earth. We mammals were one of the minor species that lived on the
fringes of the dinosaur world. Why didn't the dinosaurs develop a sub-
species with an opposing thumb and that eventually became as smart as
us humans? Is there something about reptiles that prevents them from
developing smart brains? If it hadn't been for an asteroid hitting
the peninsula of Mexico, the dinosaurs would still be ruling our world
and us mammals would still be little more than rats infesting theirs.
Why I ask this here in this newsgroup is because possibly this could
show insight into intelligence by understanding why high intelligence
didn't develop during the long dinosaur era. Then again, has this
point already been figured out? If so, links to such theories would
be appreciated.
Because Dinosaurs brains were devoted almost entirely to lifting
their legs up.
They couldn't do much else.
Scott
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why didn't at least one dinosaur species become human-level smart?
- From: The Translucent Amoebae
- Re: Why didn't at least one dinosaur species become human-level smart?
- From: Traveler
- Re: Why didn't at least one dinosaur species become human-level smart?
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Contextual features for NLP
- Next by Date: Re: Why didn't at least one dinosaur species become human-level smart?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why didn't at least one dinosaur species become human-level smart?
- Next by thread: Re: Why didn't at least one dinosaur species become human-level smart?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|