Re: artificial intelligence
- From: "Alpha" <OmegaZero2003@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:37:55 -0700
"feedbackdroid" <feedbackdroid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:09be7753-2c7e-49ee-815c-bba4095f93aa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Nice thing about "intelligence" is we can keep moving the goalposts.
Indeed! In my book on Intelligent Agents, I provide a lot of definitional
material such that one can design modules that represent/implement various
aspects of intelligence *using the appropriate approaches/technologies for
each aspect*. That way, one can keep adding modules to accommodate newly or
changed aspects thereof.
Something akin to the massive modularity approach of some AI quarters.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- References:
- artificial intelligence
- From: rscan@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: artificial intelligence
- From: Curt Welch
- Re: artificial intelligence
- From: JGCASEY
- Re: artificial intelligence
- From: rscan@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: artificial intelligence
- From: JGCASEY
- Re: artificial intelligence
- From: Wolf Kirchmeir
- Re: artificial intelligence
- From: feedbackdroid
- Re: artificial intelligence
- From: Wolf Kirchmeir
- Re: artificial intelligence
- From: feedbackdroid
- Re: artificial intelligence
- From: JGCASEY
- Re: artificial intelligence
- From: Wolf Kirchmeir
- Re: artificial intelligence
- From: feedbackdroid
- artificial intelligence
- Prev by Date: Re: artificial intelligence
- Next by Date: Re: artificial intelligence
- Previous by thread: Re: artificial intelligence
- Next by thread: Re: artificial intelligence
- Index(es):