Re: Does Searle's "Chinese Room" argument imply that consciousness is non-scientific?

JGCASEY <jgkjcasey@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 29, 7:48 am, c...@xxxxxxxx (Curt Welch) wrote:
JGCASEY <jgkjca...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 28, 2:46 pm, c...@xxxxxxxx (Curt Welch) wrote:
Is this your logic?

human brains have conscious awareness
human brains have temporal matching circuits
therefore temporal matching circuits have conscious awareness

temporal matching circuits have conscious awareness
curt's circuits are temporal matching circuits
therefore curt's circuits have conscious awareness

Except for the couple of books worth of details you
left out, sure, that's the overall logic.

Perhaps you could enlighten me on the logic for
it appears to me that the first part of the above
commits the fallacy of division?

I've written a reply three times now. And I've deleted it three times
because no matter what I write, I know you are not going to follow it.
I've written it all at least 10 times in the past, and you still don't get
even the basics of it.

The answer is that I have no more time to keep explaining to you things
that are beyond your ability to understand.

You think that when you sense thoughts springing into your head, that there
is something magical happening - something that science and physics doesn't
already fully understand. But that's just not true. Nothing magical or
hard to understand is happening. It's just an illusion that makes it seem
magical. Until you can understand it's just an illusion, you will never be
able to follow anything I write about it. You, like many people, are being
fooled by an illusion and it's apparently beyond your ability to even
comprehend that it's an illusion. I've tired for years to help you see the
truth, but I'm now out of time. You will have to figure it out for
yourself. Sorry.

--
Curt Welch http://CurtWelch.Com/
curt@xxxxxxxx http://NewsReader.Com/
.

Relevant Pages