Re: Does Searle's "Chinese Room" argument imply that consciousness is non-scientific?

tvashtar <tvashtar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm wondering if people out there can shed some light on whether or
not Searle considers consciousness to be a non-scientific process?

I don't consider it to be outside the reach of science because I don't
believe it's anything other than the physical operation of a physical
brain.

--
Curt Welch http://CurtWelch.Com/
curt@xxxxxxxx http://NewsReader.Com/
.