Does Searle's "Chinese Room" argument imply that consciousness is non-scientific?
- From: tvashtar <tvashtar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:51:13 -0000
I'm wondering if people out there can shed some light on whether or
not Searle considers consciousness to be a non-scientific process?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does Searle's "Chinese Room" argument imply that consciousness is non-scientific?
- From: Wolf Kirchmeir
- Re: Does Searle's "Chinese Room" argument imply that consciousness is non-scientific?
- From: J.A. Legris
- Re: Does Searle's "Chinese Room" argument imply that consciousness is non-scientific?
- From: Curt Welch
- Re: Does Searle's "Chinese Room" argument imply that consciousness is non-scientific?
- Prev by Date: Jack Tuszynski
- Next by Date: Re: Does Searle's "Chinese Room" argument imply that consciousness is non-scientific?
- Previous by thread: Jack Tuszynski
- Next by thread: Re: Does Searle's "Chinese Room" argument imply that consciousness is non-scientific?
- Index(es):
