Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
- From: JGCASEY <jgkjcasey@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:19:47 -0700
On Jul 20, 11:11 pm, ck <ck_NoS...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JGCASEY wrote:
A waste of time. GS has his own agenda and I don't think it
will be the same as yours. He will not be interested in any
discussion beyond his own domain and personal area of interest
as indeed is the case for most (all?) who write to these groups.
Thanks for the heads up, i'm really after a discussion on the
implications, as oppose to the definitions attached to cause
and effect.
GS does not care what kind of discussion you are after.
He has his own agenda. Agree to it or forget it.
.
- References:
- A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
- From: Glen M. Sizemore
- Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
- From: Neil W Rickert
- Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
- From: Glen M. Sizemore
- Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
- From: ck
- Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
- From: Glen M. Sizemore
- Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
- From: ck
- Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
- From: JGCASEY
- Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
- From: ck
- Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
- From: JGCASEY
- Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
- From: ck
- A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
- Prev by Date: Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
- Next by Date: Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
- Previous by thread: Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
- Next by thread: Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
- Index(es):