Re: Group topic: Kurzweil + Singularity.
- From: Anton Vredegoor <anton.vredegoor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:54:49 +0200
Don Geddis wrote:
it's a possible explanation of the
Fermi paradox:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_paradox
namely
the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability
of the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations and the lack of
evidence of contact with such civilizations.
So after reaching a certain evolutionary phase cultures disappear into some other realm not visible to us, or maybe they just (decide to) cease to exist.
I don't know about Vinge's personal opinion on the imminence of this
predicted singularity.
As for Kurzweil, he's obviously a fan of Vinge, but is far, far too
optimistic. A Vinge-style singularity may happen someday in the distant
future. But not in our lifetimes. All this short-term stuff is pure hype.
There seem to be at least two kinds of singularity approaching styles. The Kurzweil method is by gradual technological progress, the Vinge method is by almost instant transformation. I think it could be compared to Kurzweil developing faster and faster processors and computer memory and Vinge just reprogramming existing hardware on the spot so that it uses better algorithms. Of course now that we have FPGA's:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_programmable_gate_array
The distinction becomes somewhat moot. Interesting is that a Vinge style singularity can even happen in a technologically *decreasing* society because it just needs one computing element transforming itself towards a higher state so that it is capable of further improving itself indefinitely. For such a process it doesn't matter much whether its current environment is a technologically progressing society of biological organisms or whether it all happens as a random fluctuation of plasma in a star (although that would seem very unlikely).
If one accepts the possibility of a Vinge style take off, the mediocrity principle:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediocrity_principle
leads us to consider the idea of already being in a post singularity universe, maybe even a post singularity *earth*. What do I mean by a post singularity earth? I'm not even sure what that would be but I suppose a group of Neandertals (Hey, they *had* a larger brain mass than Homo Sapiens after all) or other organisms (termites? yeasts?) could have instantly reached a higher stage collectively or individually. Seen that way, we humans are not the pinnacle of evolution but just the dumbest guys currently left in the highest class in school.
A.
.
- References:
- Group topic: Kurzweil + Singularity.
- From: HMSBeagle
- Re: Group topic: Kurzweil + Singularity.
- From: Don Geddis
- Group topic: Kurzweil + Singularity.
- Prev by Date: Re: CFP: First Conference on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI-08)
- Next by Date: Re: Group topic: Kurzweil + Singularity.
- Previous by thread: Re: Group topic: Kurzweil + Singularity.
- Next by thread: Re: Group topic: Kurzweil + Singularity.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|