Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
- From: "Glen M. Sizemore" <gmsizemore2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:01:52 -0500
"Michael Olea" <oleaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lHGDh.492$jx3.303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Glen M. Sizemore wrote:
"Michael Olea" <oleaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:stuDh.524$M65.287@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Lester Zick wrote:
Not not, who's there?
Not knot who?
Not knot not!
All of which amounts to nought.
Perhaps, like his intellectual rival - a Mr. J. Bodine - he wants to be a
"double-naught spy."
Now that you have gone and blown his cover you may have to stand trial.
Did
the v.p. put you up to this?
Told me that if I didn't "out" Bodine, he would "take me bird hunting."
Fortunately, J.B. has a variety of occupations and leisure activities. Not
only is he an international playboy, he's a brain surgeon to boot. Hot
sister. Doesn't smoke "crawdads."
.
- References:
- Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
- From: Glen M. Sizemore
- Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
- From: Michael Olea
- Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
- Prev by Date: Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
- Next by Date: Re: What does it mean for a machine to understand something?
- Previous by thread: Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
- Index(es):