Re: Definition of AI.
- From: forbisgaryg@xxxxxxx
- Date: 27 Jan 2007 16:57:51 -0800
On Jan 27, 4:42 pm, "SucMucPaProlij" <muc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you can't distinguish between intelligent man and unintelligent chess program
by observing their behaviour, then how can you do it?
If you limit yourself to a black box, expect your description to be
functional
rather than implementational. For instance, can you tell me what
implementaional
technology is being used by the computer executing the chess program
from the
output of the chess program?
What makes you believe the level you've identified is appropriate to
determine
the intelegence of the system implementing chess playing?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Definition of AI.
- From: SucMucPaProlij
- Re: Definition of AI.
- Prev by Date: Re: Penrose (Was: Is a simulated brain, a brain?)
- Next by Date: Re: Definition of AI.
- Previous by thread: Re: Definition of AI.
- Next by thread: Re: Definition of AI.
- Index(es):