Re: Bayesian Inference Engine
- From: Michael Olea <oleaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 05:55:56 GMT
HMSBeagle wrote:
On 9 Jun 2006 04:38:24 -0700, "JGCASEY" <jgkjcasey@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
The winner of the DARPA grand Challenge is a Bayesian
Inference Engine.
I dont know who wrote this first. I will go ahead and attribute it to
JGC.
Anyways, its false. The DARPA vehicle that was the WINNER did not use
bayes methods. It used a coupling algorithm between a distance radar
and a visual camera. The basic motto behind the winning car was "the
flat road is this particular color, so drive towards that color
more."
The second-place vehicle, on the other hand, used bayesian methods to
determine the location of obstacles. It was not an "Inference Engine"
at all. It was more like a "cloud" algorithm, where each guess in
the "cloud" of guesses was updated as sensory information came in. The
final determination of the location of the obstacle was obtained by
finding the place in front of the vehicle with the greatest density of
guesses.
What is it that draws idiots to C.A.P. like moths to a flame?
Google: Thrun Bayesian Darpa
The truth is out there.
-- Michael
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bayesian Inference Engine
- From: HMSBeagle
- Re: Bayesian Inference Engine
- References:
- Re: Bayesian Inference Engine
- From: HMSBeagle
- Re: Bayesian Inference Engine
- Prev by Date: Re: Economy of ideas
- Next by Date: Re: nanowire/synases
- Previous by thread: Re: Bayesian Inference Engine
- Next by thread: Re: Bayesian Inference Engine
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
