Re: Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
- From: curt@xxxxxxxx (Curt Welch)
- Date: 16 Jul 2006 20:02:05 GMT
"J.A. Legris" <jalegris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Glen M. Sizemore wrote:
Maybe I should have said "sounds consistent with" instead of "sounds
like", but what grabbed me was the idea that his AI should get
incrementally better at making predictions with repeated exposures to
informative data. Bayesian probability suggests a "machine" for
carrying this out.
Just as all reinforcement learning algorithms are machines for carrying
that out as well.
--
Curt Welch http://CurtWelch.Com/
curt@xxxxxxxx http://NewsReader.Com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
- From: J.A. Legris
- Re: Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
- References:
- Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
- From: Jim Bromer
- Re: Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
- From: Glen M. Sizemore
- Re: Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
- From: Jim Bromer
- Re: Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
- From: J.A. Legris
- Re: Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
- From: Jim Bromer
- Re: Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
- From: J.A. Legris
- Re: Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
- From: Glen M. Sizemore
- Re: Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
- From: J.A. Legris
- Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
- Prev by Date: Re: Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
- Next by Date: Re: Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
- Previous by thread: Re: Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
- Next by thread: Re: Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
- Index(es):
