Re: Curtnetrons Don't Do Parity


Michael Olea wrote:
feedbackdroid wrote:

Whether or not an element - in isolation - can compute parity is
immaterial.

Think harder about what Curt has, in the past, claimed about what his *nets*
can do. Think harder about what I have claimed Curt's *nets* cannot do.
Think about whether your statement above has any bearing on that, or
whether any of your staments in this thread have any bearing on that. Think
harder. Think. Maybe then post.

-- Michael


Try reading your own words, as I re-posted..

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Curtnetrons Dont Do Parity
    ... feedbackdroid wrote: ... Think harder about what Curt has, in the past, claimed about what his ... Think about whether your statement above has any bearing on ... capable of learning, via RL, anything that needs to be learned to support ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: Curtnetrons Dont Do Parity
    ... feedbackdroid wrote: ... Think harder about what Curt has, in the past, claimed about what his *nets* ... whether any of your staments in this thread have any bearing on that. ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: learnable dynamics (was Goal of AI...)
    ... Michael Olea wrote: ... done some c programming but only dabbled in c++. ... Thanks Michael and Curt I think I get the gist of it now. ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)