Re: "true" AI Hardware Development


jj wrote:

Are you interested in developing true AI or are you just content with
simulating it on a PC??

Most branches of science are quite happy to achieve successful computer
simulations, but none of them hopes to get the *real* thing, except AI.
Physicist don't expect simulations of particle interactions to produce
actual gamma rays; meteorologists don't keep umbrellas in their desk
drawers and biologists are not required to do simulations in
containment facilities. Why then should AI expect to achieve anything
other than a simulation of intelligence? A machine implementaion can
only be truly equivalent to another machine. True AI is truly
artificial.

Joe Legris

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
    ... >>> belong in science textbooks. ... I suggest it belongs in textbooks because good textbooks ... >> have implemented one or more presumed acts of Design? ... > simulations is still a simulation. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
    ... >>> belong in science textbooks. ... I suggest it belongs in textbooks because good textbooks ... >> have implemented one or more presumed acts of Design? ... > simulations is still a simulation. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: "true" AI Hardware Development
    ... simulations, but none of them hopes to get the *real* thing, except AI. ... except AI isn't a science. ... For the same reason that car manufactures expect to get real cars coming ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: Commentary: Thanks for the Facts. Now Sell Them.
    ... a more critical tone. ... down science so that it will appeal to the ignorant bewildered ... animations and simulations not words with lines connecting them. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Puzzles
    ... Gee Peter I know it is difficult. ... Doing science is difficult. ... I couldn't actually give a stuff what your opinion of software ... simulations is - I have seen some that I thought were useful, ...
    (uk.philosophy.humanism)