Re: Paper by ~MM on distributed self-awareness
- From: "feedbackdroids" <feedbackdroids@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Apr 2006 09:30:00 -0700
4) The perceptual process shifts over time from being
highly parallel, random, and bottom-up, to being more
focused, deterministic, and top-down. As in (3), this shift
is not pre-programmed, but rather is an emergent effect
of collective behavior in the system.
As I mentioned, compare #(4) especially to Prigogine's statement that
... "...
self-organization processes in far-from-equilibrium conditions
correspond to a delicate interplay between chance and necessity,
between fluctuations and deterministic laws....".
The next sentence is "... We expect that near a bifurcation,
fluctuations or random elements would play an important role, while
between bifurcations the deterministic aspects would become dominant".
Melanie's describing a classical complex system, ala complexity theory.
Forgot to mention, there is also the concept in complexity theory from
Per Bak ["How Nature Works"] and other places of "phase transitions",
related to your comment above.
.
- References:
- Paper by ~MM on distributed self-awareness
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: Paper by ~MM on distributed self-awareness
- From: feedbackdroids
- Re: Paper by ~MM on distributed self-awareness
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: Paper by ~MM on distributed self-awareness
- From: feedbackdroids
- Re: Paper by ~MM on distributed self-awareness
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: Paper by ~MM on distributed self-awareness
- From: feedbackdroids
- Paper by ~MM on distributed self-awareness
- Prev by Date: Re: Paper by ~MM on distributed self-awareness
- Next by Date: Re: Paper by ~MM on distributed self-awareness
- Previous by thread: Re: Paper by ~MM on distributed self-awareness
- Next by thread: Re: Paper by ~MM on distributed self-awareness
- Index(es):