Re: Crick's answer to lester's conundrum


Lester Zick wrote:

<feedbackdroids@xxxxxxxxx> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:


http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/crick04/crick04_index.html

================

He had very little patience with orthodox philosophers. He felt they
became too prematurely trapped in matters of terminology. I am reminded
of a seminar on consciousness he gave at the Salk in the eighties. A
philosopher-whose name politeness forbids me from mentioning-raised
his hand and said "But Dr Crick ... you are attempting to solve the
so-called problem of consciousness yet you haven't even bothered to
define it...can you clearly define what you are talking about?" Crick's
reply: "My dear chap, there was never a time in the pre-DNA era when a
lot of us biologists sat around the table and said 'Let us first
clearly define life before we explore it'. We just went out there,
forged ahead and found out what it was. It's no doubt good to have a
rough idea of what one is talking about but matters of terminology are
best left to philosophers who spend most of their time on such things.
Indeed clear definitions often emerge from empirical research. We now
no longer quibble over questions like is a virus really alive".
Semantic hygiene, Crick felt, was largely a waste of time.

===============


The obvious implication of Crick's comment is that, if we wait before
everything is completely defined before we start work on something,
then we'll all be ghosts before we ever lift a finger.

Whereas if we just steal the results of others we won't have to wait
quite as long.



Science works because people have journals/books/etc to publish their
work in, and so others can see it, and not have to re-invent the wheel
for themselves. Science is a collaboration.

Crick's important point was "... We just went out there, forged ahead
and found out what it was. It's no doubt good to have a rough idea of
what one is talking about but matters of terminology are best left to
philosophers who spend most of their time on such things. Indeed clear
definitions often emerge from empirical research...".

.

Relevant Pages

  • Cricks answer to lesters conundrum
    ... He had very little patience with orthodox philosophers. ... became too prematurely trapped in matters of terminology. ... of a seminar on consciousness he gave at the Salk in the eighties. ... Semantic hygiene, Crick felt, was largely a waste of time. ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: Cricks answer to lesters conundrum
    ... He had very little patience with orthodox philosophers. ... became too prematurely trapped in matters of terminology. ... Indeed clear definitions often emerge from empirical research. ... Science works because people have journals/books/etc to publish their ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: Cricks answer to lesters conundrum
    ... He had very little patience with orthodox philosophers. ... became too prematurely trapped in matters of terminology. ... Yes well the truly unfortunate thing here is that Dan casts Lester as ... in point of fact it is Dan who is the orthodox philosopher and Lester ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Spreading a virus in the third world - sent to me by a student
    ... They were postmodernist science critics and other ... philosophers, mathematicians, historians, cosmologists. ... tradition and common sense, incapable of affecting any lives in ways ... else knows how to discover the truth either. ...
    (uk.philosophy.humanism)
  • Re: Spreading a virus in the third world - sent to me by a student
    ... They were postmodernist science critics and other ... philosophers, mathematicians, historians, cosmologists. ... tradition and common sense, incapable of affecting any lives in ways ... else knows how to discover the truth either. ...
    (uk.philosophy.humanism)