Re: emergence, dynamics, and computationalism


"feedbackdroids" <feedbackdroids@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1143563541.089657.48300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Glen M. Sizemore wrote:
"feedbackdroids" <feedbackdroids@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1143400882.651031.310880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Glen M. Sizemore wrote:
Each behavioral event is unique from a topographical standpoint, but it
is
the response class that has stability and continuity. Too bad the de
facto
censorship of behaviorism prevents a large number of "scholars" from
seeing
this. Those of your ilk have done a good job, Dan. Too bad that it
doesn't
serve science.



Awww. I'm gonna cry now. Awww. Poor puddy tat.

GS: Your sarcasm will not change the fact that you have done a disservice
to
an intellectual movement that you do not understand, but have actively
misrepresented.



Aww. Still licking our wounds cause we got tossed off of ....

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.bio.evolution

Let's see, what were the s.b.e moderator's comments again? See here ...

[moderator's note: Note the reference to selection later on in this
article. It's tenuous, but it's at least an attempt to connect this
topic to evolution. As I noted to you before, that's all that's
required, and something that you, alas, were unable to do in the
rejected articles. You asked for public, you get public. - JAH]

Awww. They don't want to hear you denigrating people for not accepting
your dogma over there either. You'll never learn.

Oh? Did I "get tossed off" sci.bio.evolution? Or did the moderator reject
one of my posts. You couldn't tell the truth if your little biddy testicles
depended on it. Lucky your not a journalist - or a real scientist. And I
don't recall denigrating Kolker unless calling his view simplistic is out of
bounds. You have no honor, Dan, none what so ever.








You have even gone so far as to claim to have read things
that you clearly have not. You have marshaled a sort of political support
against the view with your cronies and even suggested censorship.



ROTFLOLLOL. Pooor liddle puddy tat. I am singularly unable to marshall
anybody to anything. Alas, the story of my life. Most everyone here I
either heavily disagree with myself, or they disagree with me. The Big
Gang of Cronies. ROTFLOLLOL.

Really, Dan? Certainly you recall the off-topic attacks that you
participated in with Eray, JPL, Casey and others?


Why not form a forum on behaviorism, and maybe everyone who "joins" it
will agree with your opinions.

It isn't about "agreement, Dan. It is about intellectual honesty and
integrity - something you wouldn't know anything about.




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: emergence, dynamics, and computationalism
    ... Glen M. Sizemore wrote: ... Awww. ... against the view with your cronies and even suggested censorship. ... Why not form a forum on behaviorism, and maybe everyone who "joins" it ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: emergence, dynamics, and computationalism
    ... Glen M. Sizemore wrote: ... Those of your ilk have done a good job, Dan. ... Awww. ... ROTFLOLLOL. ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: Gradual Learning, not Reinforcement Learning
    ... Did you teach your daughter to be a fascist, like you, Dan? ... My boss understood the filth was being written by Dr. Sizemore, ... BTW, do a google search on GS, and see what you find. ... school is that all rights come with attached responsibilities. ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: emergence, dynamics, and computationalism
    ... You will notice I have always said behaviorism is ok as a methodology, ... Ahh yes - your famous problem with Skinner's determinism. ... What is your problem with determinism, Dan? ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: emergence, dynamics, and computationalism
    ... You will notice I have always said behaviorism is ok as a methodology, ... Ahh yes - your famous problem with Skinner's determinism. ... What is your problem with determinism, Dan? ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)