Re: AUI - Artificial Unintelligence


Lester Zick wrote:
...
Well the problem arises when people draft definitions for intelligence
which aren't universally exhaustive and mechanically demonstrable.


I am happy with my working concept of intelligence.

I am not a mathematician so I don't understand
'computable numbers" with respect to AI but I
read that Turing took a strong line that computers
would be able to perform anything that people do
in thinking. And I suspect he was able to understand
the implications of computable numbers and the mind.

--
JC

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Penrose vs the Robot
    ... >> So, yes, it is like the liar paradox, except that it isn't a paradox. ... However, because humans can't do it, and computers can't ... abstractions into physical reality with a one-to-one correspondence. ... Penrose is claiming/stipulating that a human mathematician ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Mathematician Using Nil With Students
    ... don't confuse the computer scientist with a mathematician. ... Dividing by zero in computers is bad. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
    ... Lester Zick wrote: ... No one uses them for computers any more. ... are unreliable and they have a short mean time between failures. ... Bob Kolker ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
    ... Lester Zick wrote: ... No one uses them for computers any more. ... are unreliable and they have a short mean time between failures. ... Bob Kolker ...
    (sci.cognitive)
  • Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
    ... Lester Zick wrote: ... No one uses them for computers any more. ... are unreliable and they have a short mean time between failures. ... Bob Kolker ...
    (sci.physics)