Re: How much intelligence?
- From: lesterDELzick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lester Zick)
- Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 19:03:42 GMT
On 4 Mar 2006 23:46:53 -0800, "chadmaester" <chad.d.johnson@xxxxxxxxx>
in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
How intelligent do you think something with the following capabilities
could become? Could it be enough to eventually comprehend natural
language? If not, what do you think is missing?
What's missing is an exhaustive understanding of natural language. If
you consider something like English it's unlikely there is any kind of
exact understanding of the mechanics involved. It's possible to piece
together some semantics and grammar but nothing like a whole picture.
1. The ability to observe (i.e., receive and create associations using
external inputs)
2. The ability to access existing associations by way of new external
inputs (i.e., mapping inputs to outputs)
3. Unsupervised punishment and reward (i.e., it associates the things
it does with the the positive or negaive results produced)
~v~~
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How much intelligence?
- From: chadmaester
- Re: How much intelligence?
- References:
- How much intelligence?
- From: chadmaester
- How much intelligence?
- Prev by Date: Re: Can brains be good or evil?
- Next by Date: Re: Can brains be good or evil?
- Previous by thread: Re: How much intelligence?
- Next by thread: Re: How much intelligence?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading