Re: face-selective region


Glen M. Sizemore wrote:
The point, of course, is that one can maintain the "module" crap only by
ignoring data - which is what Dan does best.



The article cited was published in Science mag, which is a major
journal.

Take the challenge you and DL have been offered many many times.

Write a letter to the editor, instead of coming to this forum and
starting out with your usual trademark abusiveness.

Just don't start the letter with ... "To the editors of Science journal
and all the other mentalist idiots ...", else they'll respond the same
as people on c.a.p. ...

Crank.

Waste basket.

.