Re: Observations and Assumptions in "The Chinese Room" Arguement
- From: ianparker2@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 16 Feb 2006 09:25:35 -0800
If you look at the "parity" codes you will find that it is not just a
simple parity code, it is in fact an information system whereby a
considerable amount of computation (done in parallel) is needed for
decoding.
NL evolves in a similar way. Dawkins and other evolutionary biologists
talk about memes - units of social evolution. What I am suggesting is
that words in NL have different meanings according to the words
surrounding them. Evolution will set the level of information transfer
to be approximately constant.
Natural Language has a considerable degree of redundancy, particularly
when spoken. This is very similar to the ESA codes.
These arguments are described in detail in
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.ai.nat-lang/browse_frm/thread/a...
.
- References:
- Observations and Assumptions in "The Chinese Room" Arguement
- From: Lucky
- Re: Observations and Assumptions in "The Chinese Room" Arguement
- From: Curt Welch
- Re: Observations and Assumptions in "The Chinese Room" Arguement
- From: ianparker2
- Re: Observations and Assumptions in "The Chinese Room" Arguement
- From: Anssi Hyytiainen
- Re: Observations and Assumptions in "The Chinese Room" Arguement
- From: ianparker2
- Re: Observations and Assumptions in "The Chinese Room" Arguement
- From: Anssi Hyytiainen
- Observations and Assumptions in "The Chinese Room" Arguement
- Prev by Date: Re: face-selective region
- Next by Date: Re: face-selective region
- Previous by thread: Re: Observations and Assumptions in "The Chinese Room" Arguement
- Next by thread: Re: Observations and Assumptions in "The Chinese Room" Arguement
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading