comp.ai.philosophy

• Date Index

• Sony to quit manufacturing AIBO, QRIO, Curt Welch
  • Re: Sony to quit manufacturing AIBO, QRIO, Traveler
    • Re: Sony to quit manufacturing AIBO, QRIO, Wolf Kirchmeir
      • Re: Sony to quit manufacturing AIBO, QRIO, Traveler
      • Re: Sony to quit manufacturing AIBO, QRIO, risujin
      • Re: Sony to quit manufacturing AIBO, QRIO, feedbackdroids
      • Re: Sony to quit manufacturing AIBO, QRIO, feedbackdroids
      • Re: Sony to quit manufacturing AIBO, QRIO, Wolf Kirchmeir
      • Re: Sony to quit manufacturing AIBO, QRIO, feedbackdroids
      • Re: Sony to quit manufacturing AIBO, QRIO, JGCASEY
      • Re: Sony to quit manufacturing AIBO, QRIO, feedbackdroids
      • Re: Sony to quit manufacturing AIBO, QRIO, Wolf Kirchmeir
      • Re: Sony to quit manufacturing AIBO, QRIO, feedbackdroids
      • Re: Sony to quit manufacturing AIBO, QRIO, Wolf Kirchmeir
  • Re: Sony to quit manufacturing AIBO, QRIO, risujin
  • Re: Sony to quit manufacturing AIBO, QRIO, feedbackdroids
• Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, Svante
  • Re: Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, Michael Olea
    • Re: Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, Svante
    • Re: Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, Traveler
  • Re: Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, rick++
  • Re: Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, rick++
• 7 films in philosophy and science, neuralsurfer
  • Re: 7 films in philosophy and science, Brian Bagnall
• Commonsense Reasoning: Book announcement, Erik T. Mueller
• Re: interested in working with me on an ai project in java ??, Douglas Eagleson
• Chris McKinstry - dead, grieder
  • Re: Chris McKinstry - dead, Brian Bagnall
  • Re: Chris McKinstry - dead, Traveler
• intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, bob the builder
  • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, Wolf Kirchmeir
  • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, risujin
    • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, rick++
    • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, Brian Bagnall
  • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, JGCASEY
    • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, bob the builder
      • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, JGCASEY
  • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, Curt Welch
    • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, Traveler
      • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, Curt Welch
      • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, Traveler
      • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, Curt Welch
      • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, Brian Bagnall
    • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, JGCASEY
      • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, Curt Welch
      • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, JGCASEY
      • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, Curt Welch
    • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, mimo_545
      • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, Curt Welch
      • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, Evgenij Barsukov
      • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, mimo_545
  • Re: intellignece and conciousness, the one implies the other?, rick++
• genetic tool kits, feedbackdroids
  • Re: genetic tool kits, Dimitri Ognibene
    • Re: genetic tool kits, feedbackdroids
• New Film, TRUTH LIES, neuralsurfer
• Re: QUANTIUM BEINGS OF PURE LIGHT ( CLASSIFIED ) CODE: 455, mimo_545
• "Call for Papers" - NanoTrends Journal, NSTC
• The So-Called "Failure" of 5th Generation and Logic, markwh04
  • Re: The So-Called "Failure" of 5th Generation and Logic, Traveler
    • Re: The So-Called "Failure" of 5th Generation and Logic, JAK
      • Re: The So-Called "Failure" of 5th Generation and Logic, mimo_545
      • Re: The So-Called "Failure" of 5th Generation and Logic, JAK
• biological empathy, rick++
  • Re: biological empathy, Wolf Kirchmeir
  • Re: biological empathy, Curt Welch
• Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Lester Zick
  • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JAK
    • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Lester Zick
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Curt Welch
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Lester Zick
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Curt Welch
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Lester Zick
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Curt Welch
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JGCASEY
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Curt Welch
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, redstar_
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Curt Welch
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Lester Zick
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JAK
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Lester Zick
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JGCASEY
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Glen M. Sizemore
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JGCASEY
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Glen M. Sizemore
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Curt Welch
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JGCASEY
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Curt Welch
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JGCASEY
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JGCASEY
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Curt Welch
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JGCASEY
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Curt Welch
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Curt Welch
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JAK
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, redstar_
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JAK
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JGCASEY
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Michael Olea
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JGCASEY
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Michael Olea
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JAK
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Michael Olea
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Michael Olea
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JAK
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Michael Olea
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Glen M. Sizemore
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JAK
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Michael Olea
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JAK
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Wolf Kirchmeir
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Glen M. Sizemore
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Michael Olea
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Glen M. Sizemore
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Michael Olea
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Curt Welch
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Michael Olea
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Curt Welch
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JAK
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Curt Welch
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, JAK
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Lester Zick
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Curt Welch
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Lester Zick
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Wolf Kirchmeir
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Lester Zick
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Curt Welch
      • Re: Mechanical Dualism versus Naturalized Epistemology, Curt Welch
• Why do memories die down over time?, chadmaester
  • Re: Why do memories die down over time?, Joachim Pimiskern
    • Re: Why do memories die down over time?, makc . the . great
  • Re: Why do memories die down over time?, Curt Welch
  • Re: Why do memories die down over time?, rick++
  • Re: Why do memories die down over time?, rick++
    • Re: Why do memories die down over time?, mimo_545
  • Re: Why do memories die down over time?, Evgenij Barsukov
    • Re: Why do memories die down over time?, JAK
• Excitatory and Inhibitory Signals, chadmaester
  • Re: Excitatory and Inhibitory Signals, Wolf Kirchmeir
    • Re: Excitatory and Inhibitory Signals, Lester Zick
  • Re: Excitatory and Inhibitory Signals, JAK
    • Re: Excitatory and Inhibitory Signals, JAK
      • Re: Excitatory and Inhibitory Signals, chadmaester
• Proofs of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms, kartoun
  • Re: Proofs of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms, JAK
    • Re: Proofs of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms, kartoun
• Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, Curt Welch
  • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, JGCASEY
    • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, feedbackdroids
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, JGCASEY
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, feedbackdroids
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, JGCASEY
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, Curt Welch
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, JGCASEY
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, Curt Welch
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, Glen M. Sizemore
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, JGCASEY
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, feedbackdroids
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, Curt Welch
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, JGCASEY
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, Curt Welch
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, JGCASEY
      • Fundamental Limits to Curt's Nets, Michael Olea
      • Re: Fundamental Limits to Curt's Nets, Curt Welch
      • Re: Fundamental Limits to Curt's Nets, Michael Olea
      • Re: Fundamental Limits to Curt's Nets, Curt Welch
      • Re: Fundamental Limits to Curt's Nets, JGCASEY
      • Re: Fundamental Limits to Curt's Nets, Curt Welch
      • Re: Fundamental Limits to Curt's Nets, JGCASEY
      • Re: Fundamental Limits to Curt's Nets, JGCASEY
      • Re: Fundamental Limits to Curt's Nets, JGCASEY
      • Re: Fundamental Limits to Curt's Nets, Lester Zick
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, Curt Welch
    • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, Curt Welch
  • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, feedbackdroids
    • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, Wolf Kirchmeir
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, feedbackdroids
    • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, JGCASEY
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, feedbackdroids
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, Traveler
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, feedbackdroids
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, Curt Welch
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, mimo_545
    • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, Curt Welch
      • Re: motor emulation, modularity, feedback, prediction, and dreams, feedbackdroids
• Re: a man without a server farm, Curt Welch
  • Re: a man without a server farm, forbisgaryg
    • Re: a man without a server farm, Curt Welch
  • Re: a man without a server farm, qwerty
• Re: Cool visual illusion, Curt Welch
• Re: Thinking about thinking machines, rick_sobie
  • Re: Thinking about thinking machines, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Thinking about thinking machines, rick_sobie
      • Re: Thinking about thinking machines, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Thinking about thinking machines, rick_sobie
      • Re: Thinking about thinking machines, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Thinking about thinking machines, Evgenij Barsukov
• Re: exhaustive definition in the life sciences - an oxymoron?, mimo_545
  • Re: exhaustive definition in the life sciences - an oxymoron?, feedbackdroids
    • Re: exhaustive definition in the life sciences - an oxymoron?, mimo_545
      • Re: exhaustive definition in the life sciences - an oxymoron?, feedbackdroids
      • Re: exhaustive definition in the life sciences - an oxymoron?, mimo_545
• Re: Awareness as an emergent property of information flow, Jim Bromer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Awareness as an emergent property of information flow, Curt Welch
    • Re: Awareness as an emergent property of information flow, grayden
      • Re: Awareness as an emergent property of information flow, Lester Zick
      • Re: Awareness as an emergent property of information flow, Curt Welch
  • Re: Awareness as an emergent property of information flow, Michael Olea
    • Re: Awareness as an emergent property of information flow, Glen M. Sizemore
      • Re: Awareness as an emergent property of information flow, Lester Zick
• Re: Happy New Year, CAP!, Risujin
  • Re: Happy New Year, CAP!, feedbackdroids
  • Re: Happy New Year, CAP!, Lester Zick
    • Re: Happy New Year, CAP!, JGCASEY
      • Re: Happy New Year, CAP!, Risujin
      • Re: Happy New Year, CAP!, JGCASEY
      • The skill of learning skills., Risujin
      • Re: The skill of learning skills., Lester Zick
      • Re: The skill of learning skills., Risujin
      • Re: The skill of learning skills., Lester Zick
      • Re: The skill of learning skills., Risujin
      • Re: The skill of learning skills., Lester Zick
      • Re: The skill of learning skills., Risujin
      • Re: The skill of learning skills., Lester Zick
      • Re: The skill of learning skills., Risujin
      • Re: The skill of learning skills., Lester Zick
      • The problem of intelligence., Risujin
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Risujin
      • Message not available
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Curt Welch
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Risujin
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Curt Welch
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., redstar_
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., JPL
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Curt Welch
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Curt Welch
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Curt Welch
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., JPL
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., JAN PIETER VERHEY
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Glen M. Sizemore
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., JPL
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., JAN PIETER VERHEY
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., JPL
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Allan C Cybulskie
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., JPL
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., JPL
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., JGCASEY
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., JPL
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., JGCASEY
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., JPL
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., JGCASEY
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., JPL
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., JPL
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Curt Welch
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Curt Welch
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Message not available
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Risujin
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Risujin
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., mimo_545
      • Re: The problem of intelligence., Lester Zick
    • Re: Happy New Year, CAP!, Risujin
      • Re: Happy New Year, CAP!, Lester Zick
• Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Curt Welch
  • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Allan C Cybulskie
    • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Curt Welch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Curt Welch
  • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Curt Welch
  • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Curt Welch
    • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, JGCASEY
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Curt Welch
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Michael Olea
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Glen M. Sizemore
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Lester Zick
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Lester Zick
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Curt Welch
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Michael Olea
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Curt Welch
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, mimo_545
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, mimo_545
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, mimo_545
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, JGCASEY
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Curt Welch
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, JGCASEY
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, JGCASEY
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Michael Olea
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, JGCASEY
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Curt Welch
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, mimo_545
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Curt Welch
    • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Allan C Cybulskie
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Lester Zick
      • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, Curt Welch
  • Re: Intelligence - one of degree?, mimo_545

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint