Re: Happy New Year, CAP!

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:22:54 -0500, Traveler <traveler@xxxxxxxxxx> in
comp.ai.philosophy wrote:

>On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:41:26 GMT, Risujin <risujin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Lester Zick wrote:
>>> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:38:08 -0500, Traveler <traveler@xxxxxxxxxx> in
>>> comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Happy new year to everybody on CAP! A special wish for the new year.
>>>>May the final solution to true AI be revealed in 2006. ahahaha... Fat
>>>>chance but one never knows, does one? I know one thing: if true AI is
>>>>released, some will like it and some will not. :-) But it would be an
>>>>interesting development either way. Cheers!
>>>
>>>
>>> Happy New Year to you, Louis. May you be the one to discover it.
>>>
>>> ~v~~
>>
>>Just out of curiosity but, show of hands, how many here are actually
>>working on "true AI"? (And I mean more than philosophical implications,
>>but real theory.)
>
>Well I, for one, have been working on true AI from the very beginning
>(early 1990s) although I'm now considered a crank and a crackpot by
>many and I don't blame them. Still, I do have a few supporters.
>ahahaha...
>
>BTW, true AI, to me, means any AI mechanism that can be scaled up to
>human-level intelligence by adding more processing power.

True if you have the intelligence mechanism to begin with. Then all
that matters is the architecture and implementation.

>Temporal Intelligence:
>http://www.rebelscience.org/AI/Temporal_Intelligence.htm
>
>>I've scoured the internet for papers, web-sites, anything and found
>>nothing but hacks and phonies. (See: Singularity Instutute for one.)
>
>There are a few sites/people who claim to be working on true AI. Off
>the top of my head, I can think of Jeff Hawkins'
>www.onintelligence.org, Peter Voss' http://adaptiveai.com/ and a few
>more that I can't remember right now.
>
>Louis Savain
>
>Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
>http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm


~v~~

.