Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: "Glen M. Sizemore" <gmsizemore2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:01:17 -0500
"Allan C Cybulskie" <allan.c.cybulskie@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:HUFrf.174$l87.27562@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "feedbackdroids" <feedbackdroids@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1135457677.594422.37190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Glen M. Sizemore wrote:
>> > "feedbackdroids" <feedbackdroids@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > news:1135447420.311110.135780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > >
>> > >> Where I agree with the behaviorists is that if we don't understand
> the
>> > >> beahvior we want our system to create, then we have no hope of
> solving
>> > >> AI.
>> > >> So, if you don't first understand the problem, you have no hope of
>> > >> creating
>> > >> the technology. And the only people who are hard at work trying to
>> > >> understand behavior, are the behaviorists.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I seriously doubt that more than about 1% [rough guesstimate] of the
>> > > psychology community would agree with this. [and who might that 1%
> be?]
>> >
>> > Once again Dan brings out his "big guns" - a logical fallacy:
> behaviorism is
>> > unpopular, therefore it must be wrong.
>>
>>
>> Are we confusing wrong with useful, again.
>
> If you are looking for useful, then it would seem that you should be
> aiming
> for folk psychology, which up until now is clearly the most useful theory
> of
> mind that anyone has ever found. Everyone uses it.
This is largely incorrect. My dog scratches at the back door, but not
because she has a "theory" about what controls my "opening the door." This
is the same thing as claiming that we "follow rules" when we speak our
native language, or "calculate a trajectory" when we catch a ball. It is
simple-minded nonsense.
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: Allan C Cybulskie
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- References:
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: Glen M. Sizemore
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: feedbackdroids
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: Glen M. Sizemore
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: JGCASEY
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: feedbackdroids
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: Curt Welch
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: JGCASEY
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: feedbackdroids
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: Wolf Kirchmeir
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: feedbackdroids
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: Wolf Kirchmeir
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: feedbackdroids
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: Curt Welch
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: JGCASEY
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: Curt Welch
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: feedbackdroids
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: Glen M. Sizemore
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: feedbackdroids
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- From: Allan C Cybulskie
- Re: Cool visual illusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Intelligence - one of degree?
- Next by Date: Re: Cool visual illusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Cool visual illusion
- Next by thread: Re: Cool visual illusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|