Re: Automated information display
- From: curt@xxxxxxxx (Curt Welch)
- Date: 20 Oct 2005 08:47:31 GMT
Jure Sah <jure.sah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Curt Welch wrote:
> > If I gave you a set of numbers which were an encrypted jpg picture of
> > myself, do you think you are even smart enough to know that the correct
> > way to display the data is to first decrypt it (with a key you were not
> > given) and then decompress the jpg data and display it as a grid of
> > pixels? Of course not.
>
> Well unfortunately for you. JPEG as a standard is defined and as such
> there is a deterministic way to tell if a bunch of numbers represents a
> JPEG image or not. Most graphics editing programs can do it.
Well, unfortunately for you (and the other poster as well), you mised the
fact that I said "encrypted" (or you just failed to understand the
importance of this idea).
No program, or human, on this planet would spot a strongly encrypted JPG as
a JPG. They would see it as nothing but meaningless noise and they would
have no hint as to what type of data it might be other than random noise.
No human, or computer program, on this planet, could be smart enough to
correctly recognize data like that as an encrypted JPG file.
--
Curt Welch http://CurtWelch.Com/
curt@xxxxxxxx http://NewsReader.Com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Automated information display
- From: makc . the . great
- Re: Automated information display
- References:
- Automated information display
- From: Jure Sah
- Re: Automated information display
- From: Curt Welch
- Re: Automated information display
- From: makc . the . great
- Re: Automated information display
- From: Curt Welch
- Re: Automated information display
- From: Jure Sah
- Automated information display
- Prev by Date: Re: Jeff Hawkins Q&A
- Next by Date: Re: Jeff Hawkins Q&A
- Previous by thread: Re: Automated information display
- Next by thread: Re: Automated information display
- Index(es):