Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: Traveler <traveler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:49:49 -0400
On 27 Sep 2005 21:12:33 GMT, curt@xxxxxxxx (Curt Welch) wrote:
>Traveler <traveler@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 26 Sep 2005 19:42:44 GMT, curt@xxxxxxxx (Curt Welch) wrote:
>
>> If your system does not handle interval recording and prediction, it
>> has no hope of being intelligent. So-called memory traces are
>> intervals.
>
>That's all my network does. It records and predictis intervals. The time
>which the pulse passes through each node is recorded, and the next behavior
>of the node, is controled by it's prediction of when the next pulse will
>show up, compared to when it actually does show up.
>
>It constantly adjusts its prediction of the pulse interval based on the
>actual time that every pulse does take to show up.
>
>You keep telling me to stop saying "my net does that" but yet, you keep
>saying my net is missing important features which in fact are fundimential
>to its design. How can I help but keep saying "my net does that"?
You cannot have a single homogeneous net that does so many things at
once. Besides, some of these things must be done in stages. IOW, you
must start with signal separation (one principle) and then do signal
fusion (another principle). Only then can you do sequence formation
and motor control. You cannot do these things in the same network. You
must have multiple subnetworks feeding signals to one another. On top
of that, you must do concept formation, conflict detection, motor
coordination, reinforement learning, etc... There is a reason that the
brain has multiple integrated cell assemblies each with its own
function and principle. In the brain, bi-directional signal pathways
between subnetworks are the norm, not the exception.
You come out sounding like the nodes in your net can do all these
things simultaneously. This is complete crap, Curt. You're dreaming
and you're only fooling yourself.
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: feedbackdroids
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: Curt Welch
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- References:
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: humiguel
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: Curt Welch
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: Traveler
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: Curt Welch
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: Traveler
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: Curt Welch
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: Traveler
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: Curt Welch
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: Traveler
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: Curt Welch
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- Prev by Date: Re: Understanding the mind
- Next by Date: Re: Understanding the mind
- Previous by thread: Re: What did that thread indicate?
- Next by thread: Re: What did that thread indicate?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|