Artificial Intelligence Machines

I am of the school having the opinion that knowledge as a formal
relationship may be replicated by machine action. A theory of the
knowledge action would be the symantic relation requiring the school to
define.

A relation to allow the applied knowledge in coding. And so the
applied inferenece relation of choice is to be considered the current
state of useful AI.

An inferenece in example is then related to the formal inference of
predicate truth. A symantic relation then appears in natural language
usage.

A grammatical transformation of inferenece in the abstract to the
particular example defines the symatic relation. And in predicate
truth theory the school of AI with this symantic theory would be seen
to excel or decline.

A truely useful theory would test itself. And so the school is to
define the subject applier. A subject detection statement is to
precede the applied knowledge.

And to detect the subject in real time as a machine is the true goal of
AI. Abstract knowledge is to be applied along with instances.

And abstract subject as the knowledge to test itself is this school's
definition. A truely correct conversation first requires the nature of
the abstract conversation to be encoded.

And the subject appeared the dilemma. How is the computer to disclose
its confusion consistently appears the resolution? A mistaken subject
classification is to self detect. And to always classify subject
becomes the type of conversation, otherwise.

Abstract theory must be applied consistent with the predicate theory of
choice. A long standing dilemma of AI. A formal language of the
conversation appeared impossible until the symantic relation of this
school was proposed.

A subject answer is either abstract or not in every reply resolves.
Making the choice a context of the theory of formal knowledge. A
choice to imply the answer or to ask the question. And to let the
subject ride appears the resolution to natural conversational
techniques.

And so all code must self apply the knowledge and the mistaken form. A
question to allow the formal resolution is a certain effect of a failed
assumption. Meaning confusion appears the failed assumption, and the
state is self detecting.

Every symantic coding must detect proper form and proper content. And
the computer to do the work appears the one whose language allows this
school's application.

An object instance is a truely formal representation of abstract
knowlege. A sufficient set of paramenters and the fully instantated
class will represent the formal theory of applied abstraction.

A symantic class name with existence testing applies the class to
itself for confusion testing also. A class to self reference always is
the double testing of this school.

And to test the statement for form requires its relation to the
necessity of existence. And the class to self reference then defines
this school.


class Knowledge{


void Knowledge(parameters){
A code to test particular parameters.
}
}


And the code is to test for parameter in the abstract. A parameter's
existence is to cause knowledge's necessity.
A knowledge classes proper particular then appears to cause the
identity of the inference in the particluar.

A question of the knowledge itself rather than the form of the
knowledge resolves the symantic arguement.

A detection of knowledge then appears the entire valid coding.

A class of this school is to simply be able to write the conversation.




Douglas Eagleson
Gaitherbsurg, MD USA

.