Re: OOP



> If you're looking for a radically new approach to software
> construction, check out the link below.

(it appears that my post is lost, so I will re-post it once)

....I feel like
its "cells" have not much different in essence from "objects" in OOP;
neither revolving around single OS core process nor increased
parallelism do not change that. what's missing in this analogy, is
inheritance (which OOP has, and cosa has no). correct me if I have
missed it. it seems that until there is something similar to allow
for "borrowing" code patterns, it cannot rival OOP approach.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OOP
    ... > construction, ... > Louis Savain ... inheritance (which OOP has, and cosa has no). ... it cannot rival OOP approach. ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: Neyland to Fishguard. Why?
    ... panels charting and explaining its construction and regular use. ... none of these panels explained why Neyland lost its importance ...
    (uk.railway)
  • Re: [Swedish] Some questions about Swedish language
    ... construction for marking slight uncertainty about what is being told? ... The plural forms were lost over the 20th century, ... Additionally, even earlier, there also was a separate form for ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Board ID help please
    ... construction is moving forward and I've lost all my spare storage space. ...
    (rec.games.video.arcade.collecting)
  • Re: [QUIZ] Happy Numbers #93 How happy can you get?
    ... I think you lost me on that step. ... .ceil digits. ... construction beats the hell out of trying to find them. ... another n-step happy number; this adds wrinkles I don't want to think ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)