Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: Traveler <traveler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:11:34 -0400
On 15 Sep 2005 15:53:17 -0700, humiguel@xxxxxxx wrote:
>A reinforcement-learning machine can, at least in principle,
>generate secondary behaviour by combining primary behaviours,
>testing that in the environment and learning from the feedback.
I agree but I would not use the word 'generate'. Reinforcement
learning is a selection mechanism. It does not generate anything. It
assumes the a priori existence of behaviors. It is used for combining
low-level behaviors into high-level apetitive and aversive behaviors.
A different mechanism and principle (motor coordination) is
responsible for actually generating/creating the behaviors.
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: humiguel
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: Glen M. Sizemore
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- References:
- What did that thread indicate?
- From: HMS Beagle
- Re: What did that thread indicate?
- From: humiguel
- What did that thread indicate?
- Prev by Date: Re: The structure of a self-conscious mind
- Next by Date: OOP
- Previous by thread: Re: What did that thread indicate?
- Next by thread: Re: What did that thread indicate?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|