Re: modifications of runk selection method



Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
Natalya wrote:

But have any algorithm's modifications/enhancements of "rank-proportional" selection been worked out?

Yes.

As a population converges to the/an optimum, the fitness of the
population members becomes very nearly identical, and so "rank
proportional" selection becomes nearly useless, the roulette wheel
slots are nearly identical in width..

No, that's for *fitness*-proportional selection. In rank-based roulette
wheel selection - what I called "rank proportional" selection - the
roulette wheel slots are proportional to rank, which conventionally runs
from 1 to population size (so the population member with smallest
fitness gets a slot of size 1, the next-smallest in fitness a slot of
size 2 and so on). Thus some selection pressure is always maintained
even if the spread of fitness is small - although this does make less
sense when there are many identical copies of genotypes within a
population, in which case ranking becomes somewhat arbitrary.

If instead, the fitness range from the best to worst element, plus
some token amount to prevent the least fit individual having zero
selection probability, becomes the "proportional" part, with the rest
of the fitness subtracted away, then the differences among the
population are magnified and selection pressure to improve fitness
remains high.

/.../

I hope that's comprehensible, I'm a bit too tired to be writing technical prose..

Maybe yes ;-) What you've described is indeed a well-known scheme for
maintaining selection pressure within a population with a small spread
of fitness values, but rank doesn't come into it (at least not
explicitly; you would, however, expect there to be some correlation
between rank and actual fitness).

--
Lionel B
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Mathematics Is Not a Science
    ... which is the ONLY trait that selection can act on ... > with perfectly additive effects on fitness. ... has ever been documented within nature. ... experiment I proposed to provide a refutation of Darwin's ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Wynne-Edwards ( was Homosexuality)
    ... > organisms, must ... >> always dependent on another level and is therefore not an independent ... each part type can represent a valid level of selection. ... Darwinian mono-centric theory describes each fitness independent organism as ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Ernst Mayr: Where Are We (1976)
    ... >> to determine when organism fitness altruism could evolve in nature, ... >> gene fitness been developed allowing a minimally VALID simplified ... selection exist is required to produce a valid theory of same. ... Understanding how gene fitness epistasis can be coded and inherited ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • RE: Fw: Edward O. Wilsons "bombshell" on the reality of group
    ... selection -- and the same seems to hold true for humans. ... inclusive fitness concept has always been organism group centric (group ... revolutionary poly-centric argument for the evolution of "altruism" ... argument is argued to be gene centric. ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Species Selection Redux
    ... the strength of selection at any level ... The topic was whether selection at the species ... > of an individual with the fitness of a species. ... Heritable variation in fitness ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)