Re: which gene

snow wrote:
Let me elaborate a little bit more.

Dont know. Probably there are more genes. Look online for some
scientific articles if anyone was trying to do something like this.

And it is not just genes that make you priest/fanatic etc. Also
enviroment play a big role. If priests wouldnt exist in the first place
you probably can have any genes you want and you wouldnt become a
priest.

I would advise you to read: Matt Ridley: Genome.

In fact, although I'm reluctant to endorse his specific priorities,
there's a computer scientist/mathematician, written up in a recent issue
of MIT Technology Review, who has enumerated a list of research
priorities needed to overcome aging. He's not a kook, but he's not a
scientist either.

Check out Aubrey de Grey:

http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/05/02/issue/feature_aging.asp
http://www.speculist.com/archives/000056.html
http://www.gen.cam.ac.uk/sens/
http://www.mprize.org/

Randy

--
Randy Crawford http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~rand rand AT rice DOT edu

"Dice play god with the world." -- Anon
.