Re: The Artificial Being Project
- From: "Patrick Ashley Meuser-Bianca" <pmeuser@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:39:22 -0500
This I forgot as well,
13. symbiotic
Sorry,
"Patrick A Meuser" <pmeuser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:aJ3yf.4813$LF.506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi Paras,
>
> I was just perculating a response for the group. In addition to our
> correspondence about picking up on the project, I was thinking about the
> attributes of life that such a being must incorporate as the system's
> biological parameterscould be simulated in a sense that it would be more
or
> less compatible with an authentic being in order that it could be more
> realistic and possibly be adopted as a cyborg. So here goes. Life is
> comprised and defined by the following attributes:
>
> 1.consumer
> 2.producer
> 3.exfoliation
> 4.integratible
> 5.differentiable
> 6.respiration
> 7.perspiration
> 8.excretion
> 9.secretion
> 10.osmosis
> 11.reproduction
> 12.excrement
>
> So I hope this helps and that we could collaborate a little more closely
on
> the matter. I'm working in the field of cybernetics right now,
specializing
> in discrete systems and universal translation. I feel lost without
someone
> at the same level however. I have a few associates but they seem to be on
> their own thing.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Patrick Ashley Meuser-Bianca
> Cyberneticist
>
> "Einstein" <paras1987@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1136809058.353387.165330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 1. I seriously think that the level of alife should begin at organ
> > level and more specifically I beleive that we must develop the brain
> > first and then provide a bare-bones shelter for that brain. later on,
> > brain itself can develop a full body for itself. Why should we take so
> > much pain for designing bodies when the brain of Artificial Being can
> > take care of it.
> >
> > 2. See, IMO, the evolution of first living cell has not been done yet.
> > Certainly, it is an interesting problem to simulate but it hasn't been
> > done. But, I do know that researchers are trying to synthesise
> > unnatural living cells in vitro. Read this month's The Scientist, the
> > artificial living forms is the cover story of it.
> >
> > 3. I believe that creation of life was inevitable. Because even if only
> > single molecule somehow acheived the property of self-replication, then
> > it would dramatically change the face of environment. Maybe you can try
> > to simulate this on computer, given sufficient time self-replicating
> > entities will try to evolve.
> >
> > 4. Undoubtly, Evolution! It is the same force which led to creation of
> > life and now humans.
> >
> > 5. I cannot comment on this but I would like to know why woudn't
> > Darwinian evolution account for this.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Paras Chopra
> >
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Artificial Being Project
- From: Einstein
- Re: The Artificial Being Project
- References:
- Re: The Artificial Being Project
- From: George Sp
- Re: The Artificial Being Project
- From: Einstein
- Re: The Artificial Being Project
- From: Patrick A Meuser
- Re: The Artificial Being Project
- Prev by Date: Re: The Artificial Being Project
- Next by Date: Re: The Artificial Being Project
- Previous by thread: Re: The Artificial Being Project
- Next by thread: Re: The Artificial Being Project
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|