Re: JES2 JOBNUM question $HASP050 msg
- From: Allan.Staller@xxxxxxxx (Staller, Allan)
- Date: 10 Feb 2011 13:53:04 -0800
I see no performance impact from your propose increase in JOBNUM.
Be sure your checkpoint dataset is large enough to hold the increased
number of jobs.
/$DCKPTSPACE. If not, define new CKPT's and use the CHECKPOINT
Migration dialog.
Range (IMO) should be at large enough to hold all possible jobs.
However, I don't think JES requires this (I could be wrong).
What happens if you have more jobs than range, I don't know. In my case
RANGE exceeds JOBNUM.
I recommend nnnnnn = 099999 for RANGE= (up from 36000). If you go beyond
099999, the prefix on the JOBnnnnn in HASP Messages will change to JO or
J and any automation /programs that depend on "JOB" will need to be
recoded.
Of course, it just might be easier to purge a few jobs.....<G>
HTH.
<snip>
*EAX0233I $HASP050 - $HASP050 JES2 RESOURCE SHORTAGE OF JNUM - 91%
UTILIZATION REACHED
$JD DETAILS
$HASP9103 D DETAIL 013
$HASP9104 JES2 RESOURCE USAGE SINCE 2011.040 0:00:00
RESOURCE LIMIT USAGE LOW HIGH AVERAGE
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
BERT 100000 1579 1493 1587 1541
BSCB 512 0 0 0 0
BUFX 500 3 1 5 1
CKVR 17 0 0 1 0
CMBS 1209 0 0 60 0
CMDS 1200 0 0 0 0
ICES 387 0 0 0 0
JNUM 37767 34369 34316 34369 34350
JOES 50000 43599 43551 43599 43582
JQES 36500 34369 34316 34369 34350
LBUF 500 0 0 0 0
NHBS 204 0 0 0 0
SMFB 48 0 0 0 0
TBUF 104 0 0 0 0
TGS 183464 134701 134583 134701 134651
TTAB 3 0 0 0 0
VTMB 512 0 0 0 0
$HASP9105 JES2 SAMPLING STATISTICS SINCE 2011.040 0:00:00
TYPE COUNT PERCENT
---------------- ------ -------
ACTIVE 18 0.32
WAITING DISPATCH 1 0.01
IDLE 5602 99.62
LOCAL LOCK 0 0.00
NON-DISPATCHABLE 0 0.00
PAGING 2 0.03
OTHER WAITS 0 0.00
TOTAL SAMPLES 5623
In our JES2 parm we have the following value;
JOBDEF ACCTFLD=IGNORE,
JCLERR=YES,
JOBNUM=36500,
JNUMWARN=90,
JOBWARN=80,
PRTYHIGH=9,
PRTYJECL=NO,
PRTYJOB=YES,
PRTYLOW=5,
PRTYRATE=0,
RANGE=1-37767
Does anyone know of any system degradation if we up the value of the
JOBNUM=36500 by 20% or so, is there anything we should consider before
changing the value? Do we need to consider increasing the RANGE value
as well as the JOBNUM value?
</snip>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JES2 JOBNUM question $HASP050 msg
- From: Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: JES2 JOBNUM question $HASP050 msg
- References:
- Subject headers changing in IBM-MAIN
- From: Elardus Engelbrecht
- JES2 JOBNUM question $HASP050 msg
- From: Cifani, Domenic
- Subject headers changing in IBM-MAIN
- Prev by Date: Re: Redisc overing WW II's femal e 'com pute rs'þ
- Next by Date: Re: zOS Distributed Console Enablement command
- Previous by thread: JES2 JOBNUM question $HASP050 msg
- Next by thread: Re: JES2 JOBNUM question $HASP050 msg
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
