bit.listserv.ibm-main
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: Page datasets
- Mainframe consolidation save cash for Pennsylvania government
- Re: FTP PUT with Store Unique
- System z update for Federal employees on Nov 4 in Washington DC
- Re: An Alternative Modest PARM Proposal
- From: Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: JVM based languages? (mildly OT)
- Re: FTP PUT with Store Unique
- Re: Expand Dataset Allocation Using DFDSS
- Re: An Alternative Modest PARM Proposal
- FTP PUT with Store Unique
- Re: An Alternative Modest PARM Proposal
- Re: Expand Dataset Allocation Using DFDSS
- Re: web: Global CIO: As IBM Preps For Justice's Probe, Who Started This Nonsense? -- ...
- Re: An Alternative Modest PARM Proposal
- From: Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: Detecting z Speciality Engines (zAAP or zIIP)
- Infotechspectrum: Our Direct Client is urgently in need of "Sr. Mainframe Developer"
- From: Neel Infotech Spectrum
- Infotechspectrum: Our Direct Client is urgently in need of "Database Administrator"
- From: Neel Infotech Spectrum
- Infotechspectrum: Our Direct Client is urgently in need of "System Analyst"
- From: Neel Infotech Spectrum
- Infotechspectrum: Our Direct Client is urgently in need of "Network Administrator"
- From: Neel Infotech Spectrum
- Re: VIPADEFINE - VIPADISTRIBUTE - VIPABACKUP - SysplexDistributor
- Expand Dataset Allocation Using DFDSS
- Re: Of interest to Developers
- Re: A modest PARM length proposal
- Re: Of interest to Developers
- Re: What SVCs are in use?
- Re: "BPXBATCH" Program
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: A modest PARM length proposal
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: An Alternative Modest PARM Proposal
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: An Alternative Modest PARM Proposal
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Does anyone know of a way to report on what's currently using Z/OS Page datasets?
- From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
- Re: Does anyone know of a way to report on what's currently using Z/OS Page datasets?
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: "BPXBATCH" Program
- Re: "BPXBATCH" Program
- From: Hunkeler Peter , KIUP 4
- Re: What SVCs are in use?
- From: carlos roberto visconde
- Re: "BPXBATCH" Program
- Re: "BPXBATCH" Program
- VIPADEFINE - VIPADISTRIBUTE - VIPABACKUP - SysplexDistributor
- Re: curious about Java usage.
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: "BPXBATCH" Program
- Re: "BPXBATCH" Program
- "BPXBATCH" Program
- Re: curious about Java usage.
- curious about Java usage.
- Re: An Alternative Modest PARM Proposal
- Re: RMF Spreadsheet Reporter
- Re: Dynamic Lnklst Changes
- Does anyone know of a way to report on what's currently using Z/OS Page datasets?
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: What SVCs are in use?
- From: Robert A. Rosenberg
- Page datasets
- Re: Of interest to Developers
- Bruce Williamson is out of the office.
- Re: An Alternative Modest PARM Proposal
- Re: A modest PARM proposal (WAD vs broken)
- Re: DFSMShsm ABARS
- Re: A modest PARM length proposal
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: Did you notice this?
- From: Gerhard Postpischil
- Re: An Alternative Modest PARM Proposal
- An Alternative Modest PARM Proposal
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- FW: SA22-7630-16 z/OS v1.9 MVS System Management Facilities (SMF) - layout correction
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: What SVCs are in use?
- Re: What SVCs are in use?
- From: carlos roberto visconde
- Re: RMF Spreadsheet Reporter
- New MFNetDisk video.
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: STK 9840D encryption and DFHSM
- From: O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT
- Re: What SVCs are in use?
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: STK 9840D encryption and DFHSM
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: STK 9840D encryption and DFHSM
- SV: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
- STK 9840D encryption and DFHSM
- From: O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
- SV: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- From: Nuttall, Peter , P.
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- SV: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: Of interest to Developers
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
- Re: RMF Spreadsheet Reporter
- SV: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: Dynamic Lnklst Changes
- SV: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: Dynamic Lnklst Changes
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
- Re: web: Global CIO: As IBM Preps For Justice's Probe, Who Started This Nonsense? -- ...
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Dynamic Lnklst Changes
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: Of interest to Developers
- From: Elardus Engelbrecht
- Re: JES2 - keeping only selected outputs
- Re: What SVCs are in use?
- Re: JES3
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: What SVCs are in use?
- From: Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: Of interest to Developers
- AUTO: Jo Van Hoey is out of the office (returning 08-11-2009)
- Re: What SVCs are in use?
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Global CIO: As IBM Preps For Justice's Probe, Who Started This Nonsense? -- ...
- Re: safe path From z/os 1.4 to z/os 1.10?
- Re: JES3
- Re: Global CIO: As IBM Preps For Justice's Probe, Who Started This Nonsense? -- ...
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: What SVCs are in use?
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: What SVCs are in use?
- JES3
- What SVCs are in use?
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- web: Global CIO: As IBM Preps For Justice's Probe, Who Started This Nonsense? -- ...
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: Of interest to Developers
- Re: Of interest to Developers
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: Of interest to Developers
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: Dynamic Lnklst Changes
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Time Zones (was: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers)
- Re: EZASMI Concurrent Server cann't handle mutiple open connections in the same port
- Re: EZASMI Concurrent Server cann't handle mutiple open connections in the same port
- SV: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: Dynamic Lnklst Changes
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- From: Nuttall, Peter , P.
- Re: Dynamic Lnklst Changes
- SV: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: EZASMI Concurrent Server cann't handle mutiple open connections in the same port
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- RMF Spreadsheet Reporter
- Re: Detecting z Speciality Engines (zAAP or zIIP)
- Re: AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- From: Thomas H Puddicombe
- Re: Detecting z Speciality Engines (zAAP or zIIP)
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: A modest PARM proposal
- Re: EZASMI Concurrent Server cann't handle mutiple open connections in the same port
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: Detecting z Speciality Engines (zAAP or zIIP)
- Re: AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- Re: AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- Re: Detecting z Speciality Engines (zAAP or zIIP)
- Re: load modules for CICS, IMS, DB2 and TSO
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: Dynamic Lnklst Changes
- Re: Of interest to Developers
- Re: Detecting z Speciality Engines (zAAP or zIIP)
- From: Peter X. DeFabritus
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- Dynamic Lnklst Changes
- Detecting z Speciality Engines (zAAP or zIIP)
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- A modest PARM proposal
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: EZASMI Concurrent Server cann't handle mutiple open connections in the same port
- Re: EZASMI Concurrent Server cann't handle mutiple open connections in the same port
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- From: Chokalingam Thangavelu
- Re: JES2 - keeping only selected outputs
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Marist College in Zjournal on the Maiframe
- Re: EZASMI Concurrent Server cann't handle mutiple open connections in the same port
- Re: EZASMI Concurrent Server cann't handle mutiple open connections in the same port
- Re: EZASMI Concurrent Server cann't handle mutiple open connections in the same port
- Re: EZASMI Concurrent Server cann't handle mutiple open connections in the same port
- EZASMI Concurrent Server cann't handle mutiple open connections in the same port
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- GIMUNZIP failure
- From: Myers, Edouard , OCTO
- Re: Of interest to Developers
- Re: CA support website - hacked?
- Re: Of interest to Developers
- Of interest to Developers
- From: Mike At HammockTree
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: CA support website - hacked?
- Re: CA support website - hacked?
- Re: CA support website - hacked?
- Re: Secret Service plans IT reboot
- CA support website - hacked?
- Re: INACTIVE INTERVAL EXCEEDED BY SPECIAL USER
- Re: Secret Service plans IT reboot
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- Re: GIMUNZIP failure
- GIMUNZIP failure
- From: Chokalingam Thangavelu
- Re: Secret Service plans IT reboot
- Re: JES2 - keeping only selected outputs
- Re: JES2 - keeping only selected outputs
- Re: INACTIVE INTERVAL EXCEEDED BY SPECIAL USER
- Re: JES2 - keeping only selected outputs
- Re: SCLM and ++include statements
- Re: JES2 - keeping only selected outputs
- Re: JES2 - keeping only selected outputs
- Re: SCLM and ++include statements
- Re: Secret Service plans IT reboot
- Re: JES2 - keeping only selected outputs
- JES2 - keeping only selected outputs
- Re: SCLM and ++include statements
- Re: Secret Service plans IT reboot
- Re: Secret Service plans IT reboot
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: INACTIVE INTERVAL EXCEEDED BY SPECIAL USER
- Re: INACTIVE INTERVAL EXCEEDED BY SPECIAL USER
- Re: SCLM and ++include statements
- Re: Secret Service plans IT reboot
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: SCLM and ++include statements
- Re: SCLM and ++include statements
- Re: SCLM and ++include statements
- SCLM and ++include statements
- Re: Secret Service plans IT reboot
- Re: Secret Service plans IT reboot
- Re: JVM based languages? (mildly OT)
- Re: Secret Service plans IT reboot
- Re: Secret Service plans IT reboot
- Re: Secret Service plans IT reboot
- Re: Secret Service plans IT reboot
- Re: Secret Service plans IT reboot
- Re: Secret Service plans IT reboot
- Re: JVM based languages? (mildly OT)
- Re: JVM based languages? (mildly OT)
- Secret Service plans IT reboot
- From: Roach, Dennis , N-GHG
- Re: Servicelink again
- Re: JES2 MASDEF
- Re: JES2 MASDEF
- Re: Servicelink again
- Re: Servicelink again
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: Servicelink again
- Re: Servicelink again
- Re: Servicelink again
- From: Richards, Robert B.
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: JVM based languages? (mildly OT)
- Servicelink again
- Re: JVM based languages? (mildly OT)
- Formatting SCDS using UPDHLVLSCDS(y)
- JES2 MASDEF
- EZASMI trying to Close Pending Connection
- Re: JVM based languages? (mildly OT)
- Re: Return Code from EZASMI macro Select Service
- ACTIVATE & new LPAR (cont.)
- Re: Return Code from EZASMI macro Select Service
- Re: Return Code from EZASMI macro Select Service
- Re: Return Code from EZASMI macro Select Service
- Re: Return Code from EZASMI macro Select Service
- Re: JVM based languages? (mildly OT)
- Re: ISPLINK invocation by IKJEFTSR
- Re: Return Code from EZASMI macro Select Service
- Re: safe path From z/os 1.4 to z/os 1.10?
- Re: ISPLINK invocation by IKJEFTSR
- Re: z/OSMF download size
- Re: JVM based languages? (mildly OT)
- ISPLINK invocation by IKJEFTSR
- Re: JVM based languages? (mildly OT)
- Return Code from EZASMI macro Select Service
- Re: IEFSD095 Alias
- Re: JVM based languages? (mildly OT)
- Re: JVM based languages? (mildly OT)
- Re: safe path From z/os 1.4 to z/os 1.10?
- JVM based languages? (mildly OT)
- Bizarre requirement for ENFREQ macro
- safe path From z/os 1.4 to z/os 1.10?
- Re: IEFSD095 Alias
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: omvs subsystem not operational
- Re: Bizarre requirement for ENFREQ macro
- Re: Bizarre requirement for ENFREQ macro
- Re: Bizarre requirement for ENFREQ macro
- Re: Bizarre requirement for ENFREQ macro
- Re: Bizarre requirement for ENFREQ macro
- Re: Bizarre requirement for ENFREQ macro
- Re: Using The IWMxxxx Macros Question # 1
- Re: Bizarre requirement for ENFREQ macro
- Re: Using The IWMxxxx Macros Question # 1
- Re: Bizarre requirement for ENFREQ macro
- Re: Bizarre requirement for ENFREQ macro
- Bizarre requirement for ENFREQ macro
- Using The IWMxxxx Macros Question # 1
- z/OS C.S. IPsec Question
- Re: OSA Ex3 OLM
- Re: OSA Ex3 OLM
- OSA Ex3 OLM
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: omvs subsystem not operational
- From: Hunkeler Peter , KIUP 4
- Re: Invoke OMVS TSO session
- From: Hunkeler Peter , KIUP 4
- AUTO: BRIAN X WICKETT is out of the office. (returning 10/26/2009)
- omvs subsystem not operational
- Re: Unknown Error
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: OA30702
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: OA30702
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: OA30702
- OA30702
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: Invoke OMVS TSO session
- Re: Invoke OMVS TSO session
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: DFHSM QUESTION - MANAGEMENT CLASS
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: IEFSD095 Alias
- Re: Model-204 and SMS
- Model-204 and SMS
- From: O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT
- Re: DFHSM QUESTION - MANAGEMENT CLASS
- Re: DFHSM QUESTION - MANAGEMENT CLASS
- Re: DFHSM QUESTION - MANAGEMENT CLASS
- Re: ServerPac Management Questions
- Re: DFHSM QUESTION - MANAGEMENT CLASS
- Re: DFHSM QUESTION - MANAGEMENT CLASS
- Re: Invoke OMVS TSO session
- From: Hunkeler Peter , KIUP 4
- DFHSM QUESTION - MANAGEMENT CLASS
- 回覆:RE: 回覆:Re: Invoke OMVS TSO session
- Re: APS Cobol Code Generator Mainframe
- From: Nuttall, Peter , P.
- Re: ServerPac Management Questions
- Re: Looking for a job
- From: Gerhard Postpischil
- Re: Invoke OMVS TSO session
- From: Hunkeler Peter , KIUP 4
- Invoke OMVS TSO session
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: Unknown Error
- Feasible Solution :- Incidents/Problems log
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: IEFSD095 Alias
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: Health Checker setup
- Re: Health Checker setup
- Re: Health Checker setup
- Re: Health Checker setup
- Re: Health Checker setup
- Re: Health Checker setup
- Re: Looking for a job
- z/OS Health Checker setup
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- ServerPac Management Questions
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: Unknown Error - LM5030E
- Re: Is it possible to put 2 subnets on 1 phy osa card
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: Is it possible to put 2 subnets on 1 phy osa card
- Health Checker setup
- Re: APS Cobol Code Generator Mainframe
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- From: Elardus Engelbrecht
- Re: APS Cobol Code Generator Mainframe
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: Looking for a job
- From: Wissink, Brad [ITSYS]
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: Is it possible to put 2 subnets on 1 phy osa card
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- From: Roach, Dennis , N-GHG
- Is it possible to put 2 subnets on 1 phy osa card
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: Unknown Error - LM5030E
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: IEFSD095 Alias
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- From: Elardus Engelbrecht
- Re: IEFSD095 Alias
- Re: IEFSD095 Alias
- Re: IEFSD095 Alias
- Re: IEFSD095 Alias
- Re: IEFSD095 Alias
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: Looking for a job
- IEFSD095 Alias
- Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: Off Topic Dell Customer Support
- OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: Looking for a job
- Re: Looking for a job
- Unknown Error
- Re: wto buffer shortage and "k q' cmnd no longer works.
- Re: Daylight Saving Time changes effect on CICS Transaction Server
- Re: Daylight Saving Time changes effect on CICS Transaction Server
- Re: wto buffer shortage and "k q' cmnd no longer works.
- Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: Looking for a job
- Looking for a job
- David M Briars is out of the office.
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: IBM C header files
- Re: wto buffer shortage and "k q' cmnd no longer works.
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: Daylight Saving Time changes effect on CICS Transaction Server
- Re: IBM C header files
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: IBM C header files
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: PSF SAPI
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: Shop zSeries Ordering
- Re: Shop zSeries Ordering
- From: Richards, Robert B.
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: PSF SAPI
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: Back to Work
- Re: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Daylight Saving Time changes effect on CICS Transaction Server
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: wto buffer shortage and "k q' cmnd no longer works.
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: Back to Work
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: IBM C header files
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: wto buffer shortage and "k q' cmnd no longer works.
- Re: wto buffer shortage and "k q' cmnd no longer works.
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: Back to Work
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: wto buffer shortage and "k q' cmnd no longer works.
- Re: wto buffer shortage and "k q' cmnd no longer works.
- Re: wto buffer shortage and "k q' cmnd no longer works.
- Re: wto buffer shortage and "k q' cmnd no longer works.
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- wto buffer shortage and "k q' cmnd no longer works.
- Re: U.S. house decommissions its last mainframe, saves $730,000
- Re: IBM C header files
- Re: MVS 5+ Yrs Position in Indianapolis, IN
- Re: IBM C header files
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: IBM C header files
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: CCW format 1 support
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: SMP/E ++MOVE
- a question about LOTUS NOTES,anyone can help,thanks in advance.
- Re: How to determine module name of a SVC06 LINK call.
- PSF SAPI
- Re: CCW format 1 support
- Re: CCW format 1 support
- Re: IBM C header files
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: DWDM and IPL question
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- CCW format 1 support
- Re: IBM C header files
- DWDM and IPL question
- Re: Back to Work
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- From: Gerhard Postpischil
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: Back to Work
- Re: IBM C header files
- Re: IBM C header files
- Re: Back to Work
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- From: Richards, Robert B.
- Fwd: IBM puts executive on leave after charges
- From: Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- IBM C header files
- Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: Back to Work
- Re: SMP/E ++MOVE
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: Back to Work
- big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: SDSF PREFIX (was RE: multiple jobs / same name)
- SMP/E ++MOVE
- Re: SDSF PREFIX (was RE: multiple jobs / same name)
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: SDSF PREFIX (was RE: multiple jobs / same name)
- Re: SDSF PREFIX (was RE: multiple jobs / same name)
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: SDSF PREFIX (was RE: multiple jobs / same name)
- Re: cpu upgrade
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: SDSF PREFIX (was RE: multiple jobs / same name)
- Re: IBM book prices - Printer?
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: Back to Work
- Re: IBM book prices
- Re: Back to Work
- From: Nuttall, Peter , P.
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: Back to Work
- Re: zAAP on zIIP
- Re: SDSF PREFIX (was RE: multiple jobs / same name)
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: Back to Work
- Re: Any MXI 4.3 Issues on z/OS 1.9/10/11 ?
- SDSF PREFIX (was RE: multiple jobs / same name)
- Re: Back to Work
- From: Richards, Robert B.
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: How to determine module name of a SVC06 LINK call.
- Re: AMATERSE Even Less Device Independent Than Before
- Re: CICS definitions
- Re: Problem with OPC
- Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- Re: How to determine module name of a SVC06 LINK call.
- Re: Back to Work
- Re: Back to Work
- Re: Back to Work
- Re: Back to Work
- Re: Back to Work
- Re: Back to Work
- Re: Back to Work
- Back to Work
- Re: Any MXI 4.3 Issues on z/OS 1.9/10/11 ?
- Re: Any MXI 4.3 Issues on z/OS 1.9/10/11 ?
- Any MXI 4.3 Issues on z/OS 1.9/10/11 ?
- Re: JES2 convert to dynamic proclibs in a MAS
- Re: MVS 5+ Yrs Position in Indianapolis, IN
- Re: MVS 5+ Yrs Position in Indianapolis, IN
- From: Farley, Peter x23353
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: MVS 5+ Yrs Position in Indianapolis, IN
- Re: MVS 5+ Yrs Position in Indianapolis, IN
- is out of the office.
- Re: MVS 5+ Yrs Position in Indianapolis, IN
- Re: MVS 5+ Yrs Position in Indianapolis, IN
- MVS 5+ Yrs Position in Indianapolis, IN
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: a codepage rant
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: cpu upgrade
- Re: cpu upgrade
- cpu upgrade
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: HCD Activate with new LPAR
- Re: LMCOPY failure
- Re: LMCOPY failure
- Re: LMCOPY failure
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: Power 7 & z11??? The Register's article
- Re: MCDS could not be backed up (HSM Autobackup)
- Re: AMATERSE Even Less Device Independent Than Before
- Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
- From: Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
- Re: MCDS could not be backed up (HSM Autobackup)
- Re: a codepage rant
- Re: Three Multiprise 3000 IBM S390's on Auction
- Re: CICS definitions
- Re: MCDS could not be backed up (HSM Autobackup)
- Power 7 & z11??? The Register's article
- Re: JES2 EXIT5L $load command processor
- Re: MCDS could not be backed up (HSM Autobackup)
- Re: JES2 EXIT5L $load command processor
- Re: MCDS could not be backed up (HSM Autobackup)
- Re: IBM book prices - Printer?
- From: Elardus Engelbrecht
- MCDS could not be backed up (HSM Autobackup)
- Re: How to determine module name of a SVC06 LINK call.
- Re: Problem with OPC
- Re: Problem with OPC
- Re: How to determine module name of a SVC06 LINK call.
- From: Hunkeler Peter , KIUP 4
- Re: IBM book prices
- From: Hunkeler Peter , KIUP 4
- Re: How to determine module name of a SVC06 LINK call.
- Problem with OPC
- Re: a codepage rant
- Re: a codepage rant
- From: Nuttall, Peter , P.
- Re: Locating the PFTE
- Re: How to determine module name of a SVC06 LINK call.
- From: Hunkeler Peter , KIUP 4
- Re: HCD Activate with new LPAR
- David M Briars is out of the office.
- Bruce Williamson is out of the office.
- Locating the PFTE
- JES2 EXIT5L $load command processor
- Re: IBM book prices
- Re: IBM book prices
- Re: IBM book prices
- Re: a codepage rant
- Avoid file tailoring substitution of variable
- IBM book prices
- Re: How to determine module name of a SVC06 LINK call.
- From: Gilbert Saint-Flour
- Re: a codepage rant
- Re: JES2 convert to dynamic proclibs in a MAS
- Re: CICS definitions
- a codepage rant
- Re: How to determine module name of a SVC06 LINK call.
- CICS definitions
- JES2 convert to dynamic proclibs in a MAS
- Re: How to determine module name of a SVC06 LINK call.
- Re: How to determine module name of a SVC06 LINK call.
- How to determine module name of a SVC06 LINK call.
- Re: HCD Activate with new LPAR
- Re: IBM book prices
- Re: JES2 Parmlib inconsistent with active definitions
- Re: HCD Activate with new LPAR
- Re: IBM book prices
- Re: IBM book prices
- Re: HCD Activate with new LPAR
- Re: IBM book prices
- Re: IBM book prices
- Re: IBM book prices
- HCD Activate with new LPAR
- Re: IBM book prices
- Re: IBM book prices
- From: Elardus Engelbrecht
- Re: IODF Change...
- Re: IBM book prices
- Re: IBM book prices
- Re: How to concatenate
- Re: IBM book prices
- Re: IODF Change...
- Re: IODF Change...
- Oct 20 Webcast: Responding to Today s Demands with a Dynamic Infrastructure
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: JES2 Parmlib inconsistent with active definitions
- Re: IBM book prices
- Re: JES2 Parmlib inconsistent with active definitions
- Re: PSW question
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- CA Support Online - Maintenance Outage
- Re: JES2 Parmlib inconsistent with active definitions
- Re: IBM book prices
- Re: Moving Catalog Entries
- From: Burrell, C. Todd , CDC/OCOO/ITSO, CTR
- Re: PSW question
- Re: JES2 Parmlib inconsistent with active definitions
- Re: Moving Catalog Entries
- From: Amerigo Baldassarri
- Re: JES2 Parmlib inconsistent with active definitions
- Re: IBM book prices
- Re: JES2 Parmlib inconsistent with active definitions
- Re: Alternatives to TSM for Linux under Z/os DR?
- Re: Instream Commands
- Re: IODF Change...
- Re: PSW question
- Re: PSW question
- Re: IODF Change...
- Re: IODF Change...
- Re: Moving Catalog Entries
- Re: IODF Change...
- Re: IODF Change...
- Re: Moving Catalog Entries
- Re: PSW question
- Re: JES2 Parmlib inconsistent with active definitions
- Re: JES2 Parmlib inconsistent with active definitions
- Moving Catalog Entries
- Re: Instream Commands
- Re: Ron Ferguson's VSAM Book
- From: Richards, Robert B.
- IBM book prices
- Re: PSW question
- Re: Ron Ferguson's VSAM Book
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic
- Re: Calulators or Computers? (Was: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?)
- Re: PSW question
- Re: JES2 Parmlib inconsistent with active definitions
- Re: additional processor?
- Re: PSW question
- Re: IODF Change...
- Re: IODF Change...
- Re: additional processor?
- Re: PSW question
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Page Faults and Interrupts
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- JES2 Parmlib inconsistent with active definitions
- Re: Instream Commands
- Re: Alternatives to TSM for Linux under Z/os DR?
- Re: additional processor?
- Re: Calulators or Computers? (Was: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?)
- Re: Three Multiprise 3000 IBM S390's on Auction
- Re: Three Multiprise 3000 IBM S390's on Auction
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: additional processor?
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: Calulators or Computers? (Was: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?)
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: IODF Change...
- Re: Calulators or Computers? (Was: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?)
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic
- Re: additional processor?
- Re: IODF Change...
- Re: IODF Change...
- Re: IODF Change...
- Calulators or Computers? (Was: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?)
- Re: IODF Change...
- Re: IODF Change...
- Re: IODF Change...
- From: Wissink, Brad [ITSYS]
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic
- Re: IODF Change...
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: IODF Change...
- From: SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Pete Eggebeen
- Re: IODF Change...
- Re: additional processor?
- Re: additional processor?
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Instream Commands
- IODF Change...
- Re: Question on VVDS creation (implicltly)
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: additional processor?
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Multiple-Language Support in z/OS
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Three Multiprise 3000 IBM S390's on Auction
- Re: additional processor?
- Re: Alternatives to TSM for Linux under Z/os DR?
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: additional processor?
- Re: additional processor?
- Re: Three Multiprise 3000 IBM S390's on Auction
- Re: Three Multiprise 3000 IBM S390's on Auction
- Re: Three Multiprise 3000 IBM S390's on Auction
- Re: additional processor?
- Re: Three Multiprise 3000 IBM S390's on Auction
- Re: Three Multiprise 3000 IBM S390's on Auction
- Re: additional processor?
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: additional processor?
- Re: additional processor?
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic
- Re: additional processor?
- From: Thomas H Puddicombe
- Re: Alternatives to TSM for Linux under Z/os DR?
- Three Multiprise 3000 IBM S390's on Auction
- Alternatives to TSM for Linux under Z/os DR?
- From: O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: U.S. house decommissions its last mainframe, saves $730,000
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: Question on VVDS creation (implicltly)
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: additional processor?
- additional processor?
- Re: Question on VVDS creation (implicltly)
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: Question on VVDS creation (implicltly)
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: Question on VVDS creation (implicltly)
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: More bad news.
- Re: U.S. house decommissions its last mainframe, saves $730,000
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: The bleak future of COBOL
- Re: U.S. house decommissions its last mainframe, saves $730,000
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: Question on VVDS creation (implicltly)
- Re: PSW question
- Re: CICS exit &VERSION
- Steven Liston/IS/SLC/StandardLifeGroup is out of the office.
- AUTO: Klaus Klein/Germany/IBM is out of the office until 10.04.2000. (returning 18.10.2009)
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: Question on VVDS creation (implicltly)
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: U.S. house decommissions its last mainframe, saves $730,000
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Job name standards (Was: multiple jobs / same name)
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: How to concatenate
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: How to concatenate
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: U.S. house decommissions its last mainframe, saves $730,000
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: ISPF DDLIST COMPRESS DISP=SHR ENQ
- Re: U.S. house decommissions its last mainframe, saves $730,000
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: U.S. house decommissions its last mainframe, saves $730,000
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: How to concatenate
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: Question on VVDS creation (implicltly)
- Re: ISPF DDLIST COMPRESS DISP=SHR ENQ
- Re: ISPF DDLIST COMPRESS DISP=SHR ENQ
- Re: U.S. house decommissions its last mainframe, saves $730,000
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- From: Farley, Peter x23353
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: ISPF DDLIST COMPRESS DISP=SHR ENQ
- From: Gilbert Saint-Flour
- Re: ISPF DDLIST COMPRESS DISP=SHR ENQ
- From: Gilbert Saint-Flour
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Receive file size limit
- Re: ISPF DDLIST COMPRESS DISP=SHR ENQ
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: ISPF DDLIST COMPRESS DISP=SHR ENQ
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Outsourcing your Computer Center to IBM ?
- Re: Receive file size limit
- Re: Receive file size limit
- Re: How to concatenate
- Re: CICS problem at DR
- Re: How to concatenate
- Re: Receive file size limit
- From: Farley, Peter x23353
- Re: Receive file size limit
- Re: Receive file size limit
- Receive file size limit
- The bleak future of COBOL
- Re: How to concatenate
- Re: Question on VVDS creation (implicltly)
- Re: Question on VVDS creation (implicltly)
- Re: Question on VVDS creation (implicltly)
- Re: How to concatenate
- Re: Question on VVDS creation (implicltly)
- Re: copy VSAM files
- Re: U.S. house decommissions its last mainframe, saves $730,000
- Re: U.S. house decommissions its last mainframe, saves $730,000
- Re: Question on VVDS creation (implicltly)
- Re: copy VSAM files
- Re: copy VSAM files
- Re: Question on VVDS creation (implicltly)
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: copy VSAM files
- Re: copy VSAM files
- From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
- Re: copy VSAM files
- Question on VVDS creation (implicltly)
- ISPF DDLIST COMPRESS DISP=SHR ENQ
- From: Gilbert Saint-Flour
- CICS exit &VERSION
- Re: How to concatenate in TSO/ISPF
- From: Gilbert Saint-Flour
- is out of the office.
- Re: How to concatenate
- Re: How to concatenate
- Re: How to concatenate
- Re: How to concatenate
- Re: Speed up DYNALLOC ?
- Re: U.S. house decommissions its last mainframe, saves $730,000
- Re: U.S. house decommissions its last mainframe, saves $730,000
- Re: U.S. house decommissions its last mainframe, saves $730,000
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: Fw: ShopzSeries Outage and IP Address Changes Notification
- Re: CICS problem at DR
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- z/OSMF 1.11 Service Update 1 UK50610 and revised doc http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/zosmf/
- Re: CICS problem at DR
- Re: CICS problem at DR
- Re: CICS problem at DR
- Re: CICS problem at DR
- Re: CICS problem at DR
- Re: CICS problem at DR
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: CICS problem at DR
- CICS problem at DR
- Re: PSW question
- (none)
- Cloud Computing fail
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: How to concatenate
- Re: How to concatenate
- Re: How to concatenate
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- How to concatenate
- Re: Why no arm statement inside?
- Re: PSW question
- Re: PSW question
- Re: PSW question
- Re: PSW question
- PSW question
- Re: Page Faults and Interrupts
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- Re: ACS routines
- VSAM R15=08 Open
- From: prabhath gannavarapu
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Job name standards (Was: multiple jobs / same name)
- Re: Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- Re: More bad news.
- Re: Page Faults and Interrupts
- Re: IBM Mainframes Draw Antitrust Scrutiny
- Re: IBM Mainframes Draw Antitrust Scrutiny
- AUTO: Alan Brown is out of the office (returning 10/19/2009)
- Re: Page Faults and Interrupts
- Page Faults and Interrupts
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: FEX (Find EXpression)
- Re: Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- Re: More bad news.
- Re: More bad news.
- Re: My IEFACTRT crippled?
- Re: My IEFACTRT crippled?
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: My IEFACTRT crippled?
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: AMATERSE Even Less Device Independent Than Before
- Re: Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- Re: Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Job name standards (Was: multiple jobs / same name)
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: IBM Mainframes Draw Antitrust Scrutiny
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: My IEFACTRT crippled?
- Re: My IEFACTRT crippled?
- Re: My IEFACTRT crippled?
- Re: Mark Thomen
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- From: Farley, Peter x23353
- Fw: ShopzSeries Outage and IP Address Changes Notification
- Check out 4.4.1 "z/OS V1R8.0 Infoprint Server User's Guide" IBM Library Serve
- Mark Thomen
- BAMA UPS work.
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: My IEFACTRT crippled?
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: My IEFACTRT crippled?
- Re: Deactivate LPAR
- FEX (Find EXpression)
- Re: My IEFACTRT crippled?
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Why no arm statement inside?
- My IEFACTRT crippled?
- Re: Why no arm statement inside?
- Re: Speed up DYNALLOC ?
- From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
- Re: Why no arm statement inside?
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: Why no arm statement inside?
- Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: Speed up DYNALLOC ?
- Re: Speed up DYNALLOC ?
- Re: IBM Mainframes Draw Antitrust Scrutiny
- Re: Why no arm statement inside?
- Re: Speed up DYNALLOC ?
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: Speed up DYNALLOC ?
- Re: Why no arm statement inside?
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: Job name standards (Was: multiple jobs / same name)
- Re: Why no arm statement inside?
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- From: Farley, Peter x23353
- Speed up DYNALLOC ?
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: Experience with NPF
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Not authorize to search in IBM List archives
- Experience with NPF
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- From: Farley, Peter x23353
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- SV: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: FEX (Find EXpression)
- Re: Job name standards (Was: multiple jobs / same name)
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: IBM 1401 Announcement, 50th Anniversary today, Oct 5th
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: FEX (Find EXpression)
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Why no arm statement inside?
- Re: Password?
- From: Robert S. Hansel , RSH
- Re: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
- Leonard Sasso/GIS/CSC is "Out-of-the-Office."
- AUTO: Angelo Corridori is out of the office.
- Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- IBM Mainframes Draw Antitrust Scrutiny
- BRIAN X WICKETT is out of the office.
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Fw: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Is there an owner of IBM-MAIN nowdays?
- Re: Not authorize to search in IBM List archives
- Re: Fw: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Not authorize to search in IBM List archives
- Fw: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- Re: Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- Re: Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- Re: Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- Re: Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- Re: Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Is there an owner of IBM-MAIN nowdays?
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: Is there an owner of IBM-MAIN nowdays?
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Broken Brancher (was Re: Best IEFACTRT)
- Re: TSO HELP TEXT FOR LIST OF COMMANDS
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: TSO HELP TEXT FOR LIST OF COMMANDS
- Re: DFHSM QUESTION - LISTING ML2 ENTRIES (MCDS) FOR A SPECIFIC HLQ
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Planned IBMLink Outage - October 23-24
- Re: TSO HELP TEXT FOR LIST OF COMMANDS
- Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- Re: What is largest record that can be sent using LU2?
- Re: TSO HELP TEXT FOR LIST OF COMMANDS
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: No echo of own posts [was: RE: Is there an owner of IBM-MAIN nowdays?]
- From: Farley, Peter x23353
- Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
- From: Farley, Peter x23353
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: Planned IBMLink Outage - October 23-24
- Re: Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- Re: TSO HELP TEXT FOR LIST OF COMMANDS
- From: Gilbert Saint-Flour
- Re: Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: IEFC614I
- Re: IEFC614I
- Re: DFHSM QUESTION - LISTING ML2 ENTRIES (MCDS) FOR A SPECIFIC HLQ
- Re: Is there an owner of IBM-MAIN nowdays?
- Re: Broken Brancher (was Re: Best IEFACTRT)
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Issues with FDRTCOPY and TMS
- Re: Password?
- Re: TSO HELP TEXT FOR LIST OF COMMANDS
- Re: TSO HELP TEXT FOR LIST OF COMMANDS
- Re: Password?
- Re: TSO HELP TEXT FOR LIST OF COMMANDS
- Re: Password?
- Password?
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: DFHSM QUESTION - LISTING ML2 ENTRIES (MCDS) FOR A SPECIFIC HLQ
- Re: Where to find statistics for fetched programs?
- Re: TSO HELP TEXT FOR LIST OF COMMANDS
- From: Gilbert Saint-Flour
- Justice Department probing allegations of abuse by IBM in mainframe computer market
- Re: Is there an owner of IBM-MAIN nowdays?
- Re: TSO HELP TEXT FOR LIST OF COMMANDS
- Re: TSO HELP TEXT FOR LIST OF COMMANDS
- Re: IEFC614I
- Re: TSO HELP TEXT FOR LIST OF COMMANDS
- Re: TSO HELP TEXT FOR LIST OF COMMANDS
- SUBMIT Macros (was: Multiple jobs/same name)
- Re: IEFC614I
- IEFC614I
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: What is largest record that can be sent using LU2?
- Andre Santos/CampusA2/TotalSystem is out of the office.
- From: Subscribe Ibm-Main Abs
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: What is largest record that can be sent using LU2?
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: TSO HELP TEXT FOR LIST OF COMMANDS
- Re: TSO HELP TEXT FOR LIST OF COMMANDS
- Re: What is largest record that can be sent using LU2?
- Re: What is largest record that can be sent using LU2?
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: Where to find statistics for fetched programs?
- TSO HELP TEXT FOR LIST OF COMMANDS
- From: Gilbert Saint-Flour
- Re: VSAM Last Reference Date Documentation
- What is largest record that can be sent using LU2?
- Re: VSAM Last Reference Date Documentation
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: How is SNA Sense 087D0001 caused by RUSIZES in logmode?
- Re: How is SNA Sense 087D0001 caused by RUSIZES in logmode?
- Re: How is SNA Sense 087D0001 caused by RUSIZES in logmode?
- DFHSM QUESTION - LISTING ML2 ENTRIES (MCDS) FOR A SPECIFIC HLQ
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- VSAM Last Reference Date Documentation
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: How is SNA Sense 087D0001 caused by RUSIZES in logmode?
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- How is SNA Sense 087D0001 caused by RUSIZES in logmode?
- Re: Issues with FDRTCOPY and TMS
- From: O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- From: Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
- Re: Ron Ferguson's VSAM Book
- AW: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Re: IBMLink Scheduled Outages
- Re: Issues with FDRTCOPY and TMS
- Re: IBMLink Scheduled Outages
- Java - second problem solved
- Java problem one solved!
- mainframe e-mail with attachments
- Issues with FDRTCOPY and TMS
- From: O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: IBMLink Scheduled Outages
- Re: IBMLink Scheduled Outages
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: IBMLink Scheduled Outages
- Re: IBMLink Scheduled Outages
- IBMLink Scheduled Outages
- Re: Dynamically change FLDTAB back to the internal table
- Re: REXX & JES2
- From: Subcribe Ibm-Main Anonymous
- Re: Curioser and curiouser
- Re: Deeper java problem
- Re: Deeper java problem
- Re: Deeper java problem
- Re: Curioser and curiouser
- Re: Deeper java problem
- Re: Curioser and curiouser
- Re: Curioser and curiouser
- Re: Curioser and curiouser
- Re: Curioser and curiouser
- Curioser and curiouser
- Re: Dynamically change FLDTAB back to the internal table
- Re: Dynamically change FLDTAB back to the internal table
- Dynamically change FLDTAB back to the internal table
- Re: Best IEFACTRT (off topic)
- Re: Move files between remote hosts via FTP
- From: Subcribe Ibm-Main Anonymous
- Re: Ron Ferguson's VSAM Book
- Re: FEX (Find EXpression)
- Re: IRLM timeout after IPL
- Re: Deeper java problem
- Re: Deeper java problem
- Re: Ron Ferguson's VSAM Book
- Re: Deeper java problem
- Re: Ron Ferguson's VSAM Book
- From: Nuttall, Peter , P.
- Re: Deeper java problem
- Re: Edit Macros and Compiled REXX
- Re: Edit Macros and Compiled REXX
- Re: Ron Ferguson's VSAM Book
- Re: Get 'Group Capacity Limit' programmatically
- Re: Edit Macros and Compiled REXX
- Antwort: Deeper java problem
- Re: Planned IBMLink Outage - October 23-24
- Edit Macros and Compiled REXX
- Deeper java problem
- Ron Ferguson's VSAM Book
- Re: Java problem
- Antwort: [MVS-OE] Java problem
- Re: FEX (Find EXpression)
- Re: [MVS-OE] Java problem
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- From: Robert S. Hansel , RSH
- Get 'Group Capacity Limit' programmatically
- Re: [MVS-OE] Java problem
- Re: [MVS-OE] Java problem
- Re: [MVS-OE] Java problem
- FEX (Find EXpression)
- Re: Move files between remote hosts via FTP
- AUTO: Werner Pause is out of the office. (returning 10.10.2009)
- Java problem
- Re: HFS question
- Re: AMATERSE Even Less Device Independent Than Before
- From: Gerhard Postpischil
- Re: HFS question
- Re: Planned IBMLink Outage - October 23-24
- Re: Starting fresh, was Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: AMATERSE Even Less Device Independent Than Before
- Re: HFS question
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: HFS question
- Re: HFS question
- Starting fresh, was Multiple jobs/same name
- HFS question
- Re: Job name standards (Was: multiple jobs / same name)
- Re: Job name standards (Was: multiple jobs / same name)
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: AMATERSE Even Less Device Independent Than Before
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: AMATERSE Even Less Device Independent Than Before
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Planned IBMLink Outage - October 23-24
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: JES2 SUBTDEF Statement
- Re: 500 Pound Gorilla & Downsizing
- Re: Move files between remote hosts via FTP
- AMATERSE Even Less Device Independent Than Before
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- JES2 SUBTDEF Statement
- Re: I am looking for a “poor man automation"
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: USER/OWNER/&SYSUID (was Multiple jobs/same name
- WPS 2.4 now on z/Linux
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: 500 Pound Gorilla & Downsizing
- Re: 500 Pound Gorilla & Downsizing
- Re: 500 Pound Gorilla & Downsizing
- Re: 500 Pound Gorilla & Downsizing
- Re: 500 Pound Gorilla & Downsizing
- Re: 500 Pound Gorilla & Downsizing
- Re: Broken hardware was Re: Broken Brancher (was Re: Best IEFACTRT)
- From: TrailingEdgeTechnologies
- Re: 500 Pound Gorilla & Downsizing
- Re: USER/OWNER/&SYSUID (was Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: 500 Pound Gorilla & Downsizing
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: USER/OWNER/&SYSUID (was Multiple jobs/same name
- 500 Pound Gorilla & Downsizing
- Re: USER/OWNER/&SYSUID (was Multiple jobs/same name
- IBM 1401 Announcement, 50th Anniversary today, Oct 5th
- From: Andreas F. Geissbuehler
- Re: Move files between remote hosts via FTP
- Move files between remote hosts via FTP
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- USER/OWNER/&SYSUID (was Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: Multiple jobs/same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: Job name standards (Was: multiple jobs / same name)
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: SDUMPX and Regs at Time of Dump
- AUTO: Brian Beth/Milwaukee/IBM is out of the office. (returning 10/05/2009)
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: Broken hardware was Re: Broken Brancher (was Re: Best IEFACTRT)
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: Job name standards (Was: multiple jobs / same name)
- Re: Job name standards (Was: multiple jobs / same name)
- Re: Planned IBMLink Outage October 2nd-3rd
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Broken hardware was Re: Broken Brancher (was Re: Best IEFACTRT)
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- JES2 or JES3
- Re: Friday question: empty data set allocation
- Job name standards (Was: multiple jobs / same name)
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: Quoting Text
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: Broken Brancher (was Re: Best IEFACTRT)
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: Best IEFACTRT (off topic)
- Re: Broken Brancher
- Re: Friday question: empty data set allocation
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: SDUMPX and Regs at Time of Dump
- Controlling the muse on the z9 HMC
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: SDUMPX and Regs at Time of Dump
- Re: 3494 help requested
- Re: 3494 help requested
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- zOS DR Test Suggestions
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Friday question: empty data set allocation
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- Re: multiple jobs / same name
- multiple jobs / same name
- Re: Deactivate LPAR
- Re: GET IBM_MAIN INFO
- Re: Broken hardware was Re: Broken Brancher (was Re: Best IEFACTRT)
- Re: Deactivate LPAR
- Re: Quoting Text
- Re: ACS routines
- Quoting Text
- Re: Broken hardware was Re: Broken Brancher (was Re: Best IEFACTRT)
- Re: Broken hardware was Re: Broken Brancher (was Re: Best IEFACTRT)
- Re: Broken Brancher
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: Broken Brancher
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: ACS routines
- Re: Broken Brancher (was Re: Best IEFACTRT)
- Re: Broken Brancher (was Re: Best IEFACTRT)
- Re: ACS routines
- Re: Best IEFACTRT
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Broken hardware was Re: Broken Brancher (was Re: Best IEFACTRT)
- Re: Best IEFACTRT (off topic)
- Re: Best IEFACTRT (off topic)
- Re: REXX & JES2
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: SDUMPX and Regs at Time of Dump
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- Re: Broken Brancher (was Re: Best IEFACTRT)
- From: Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
- ACS routines
- Re: 3494 help requested
- Re: Suppression slip Traps
- Re: Principle of Least Astonishment (Was: IDCAMS delete with mask)
- Re: 3494 help requested
- Re: TCP/IP sock_debug()
- Re: Broken Brancher (was Re: Best IEFACTRT)
- From: Roach, Dennis , N-GHG
- Re: VSAM Performance & Options - Food for Thought
- Re: SDUMPX and Regs at Time of Dump
- Re: SDUMPX and Regs at Time of Dump
- Re: VSAM Performance & Options - Food for Thought
- Re: SDUMPX and Regs at Time of Dump
- Re: SMP/E DVD Format? (was: Software delivery via internet or tape)
- Re: SDUMPX and Regs at Time of Dump
- Re: SDUMPX and Regs at Time of Dump
- Re: VSAM Performance & Options - Food for Thought
- Re: Best IEFACTRT (off topic)
- GET IBM_MAIN INFO
- Re: Suppression slip Traps
- Re: Deactivate LPAR
- Re: SMP/E DVD Format?
- Reading PDS member and storing value
- Re: Deactivate LPAR
- Re: 3494 help requested
- Ted Kotlowski is out of the office.
- Re: Deactivate LPAR
- Neon zPrime webinar
- Re: Best IEFACTRT (off topic)
- From: Gerhard Postpischil
- Re: Deactivate LPAR
- Re: Best IEFACTRT (off topic)
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: Best IEFACTRT (off topic)
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: Deactivate LPAR
- Re: 3494 help requested
- Re: z9 BC Last date
- Re: Planned IBMLink Outage October 2nd-3rd
- Re: Best IEFACTRT (off topic)
- Re: Deactivate LPAR
- Re: Best IEFACTRT (off topic)
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: Best IEFACTRT (off topic)
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- 3494 help requested
- Re: Best IEFACTRT (off topic)
- From: Gerhard Postpischil
- Re: SMP/E DVD Format? (was: Software delivery via internet or tape)
- Re: VSAM Performance & Options - Food for Thought
- Re: Deactivate LPAR
- Re: Suppression slip Traps
- Re: Deactivate LPAR
- Re: VSAM Performance & Options - Food for Thought
- From: Richards, Robert B.
- Re: IDCAMS delete with mask
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: SMP/E DVD Format? (was: Software delivery via internet or tape)
- Re: Suppression slip Traps
- Re: SMP wants volume SCRTCH during apply
- Broken Brancher (was Re: Best IEFACTRT)
- Re: SMP/E DVD Format? (was: Software delivery via internet or tape)
- Re: Deactivate LPAR
- Re: Deactivate LPAR
- Re: Deactivate LPAR
- Re: SMP/E DVD Format? (was: Software delivery via internet or tape)
- Re: IDCAMS delete with mask
- Re: IDCAMS delete with mask
- Continous Systems Modeling Package (CSMP)
- Re: SMP/E DVD Format? (was: Software delivery via internet or tape)
- Re: Deactivate LPAR
- Re: using the COD
- Re: SMP wants volume SCRTCH during apply
- Deactivate LPAR
- Re: SMP wants volume SCRTCH during apply
- Re: using the COD
- Re: using the COD
- Re: ISPF question
- Re: SDUMPX and Regs at Time of Dump
- Re: Best IEFACTRT
- Re: ISPF question
- Suppression slip Traps
- Re: using the COD
- Re: SDUMPX and Regs at Time of Dump
- Re: SDUMPX and Regs at Time of Dump
- VSAM Performance & Options - Food for Thought
- Re: More bad news.
- SDUMPX and Regs at Time of Dump
- Re: ISPF question
- Re: Best IEFACTRT - Clarified
- Re: SMP wants volume SCRTCH during apply
- Re: ISPF question
- Re: ISPF question
- Re: using the COD
- Re: SMP wants volume SCRTCH during apply
- using the COD
- Re: REXX & JES2
- Re: ISPF question
- SMP/E DVD Format? (was: Software delivery via internet or tape)
- Best IEFACTRT (off topic)
- From: Mike Kerford-Byrnes
- Re: TCP/IP sock_debug()
- ISPF question
- Re: SMP wants volume SCRTCH during apply
- Re: more bad news about "abyss"
- Re: More bad news.
- Re: Best IEFACTRT
- Re: SMP wants volume SCRTCH during apply
- Re: SMP wants volume SCRTCH during apply
