Revised GRS Entries with CON or EXCL requests
- From: starsoul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lizette Koehler)
- Date: 6 Sep 2008 07:52:25 -0700
Oops - I forgot to add
We are z/OS V1.9 running 5 LPARs in a SYSPLEX all shared dasd.
A vendor has requested I update my GRS entries to the following statements:
RNLDEF RNL(CON) TYPE(GENERIC) QNAME(SYSVTOC)
RNLDEF RNL(CON) TYPE(GENERIC) QNAME(SYSZVVDS)
My current statements are:
RNLDEF RNL(EXCL) TYPE(GENERIC) QNAME(SYSZVVDS)
RNLDEF RNL(EXCL) TYPE(GENERIC) QNAME(SYSVTOC)
I know from the Planning for GRS manual a CON: RESERVE requests should
result in only a global ENQ or a hardware reserve and a local (SYSTEM) ENQ.
And an EXCL should: Convert a SYSTEMS to SYSTEM request
Can anyone provide some insight as to what my impacts might be in making
this change? The vendor is going to be doing data set moves on my live
systems which will also be running a normal workload.
Will this cause reserves to cause me a problem at the volume level? My
concern is we are running with EXCL and they need us to run CON on VTOC and
VVDS. I would like to try and understand any impacts this type of change
could have.
Thanks for any input
Lizette
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Revised GRS Entries with CON or EXCL requests
- From: Knutson, Sam
- Re: Revised GRS Entries with CON or EXCL requests
- Prev by Date: GRS Entries with CON or EXCL requests
- Next by Date: Re: Info on Setting Up an Lpar for Flashcopy
- Previous by thread: GRS Entries with CON or EXCL requests
- Next by thread: Re: Revised GRS Entries with CON or EXCL requests
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|