bit.listserv.ibm-main

• Date Index

---

• Firewall, Ward, Mike S
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Firewall, Jan Vanbrabant
  • Re: Firewall, Chris Mason
• COBOL subroutine(s) for batch outgoing SOAP, McKown, John
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: COBOL subroutine(s) for batch outgoing SOAP, Roland Schiradin
• DFHSM: PDA (Problem Determination Aid) File, Arturo
• IEANUC0Z module in SYS1.NUCLEUS., Richbourg, Claude
  • Re: IEANUC0Z module in SYS1.NUCLEUS., Mark Jacobs
• (Off topic) Decompress PDF, Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
  • Re: (Off topic) Decompress PDF, Chase, John
  • Re: (Off topic) Decompress PDF, Field, Alan C.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: (Off topic) Decompress PDF, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
    • Re: (Off topic) Decompress PDF, Rick Fochtman
      • Re: (Off topic) Decompress PDF, Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
  • Re: (Off topic) Decompress PDF, Ed Finnell
• Re: SYS PROG, Eatherly, John D [EQ]
  • Re: SYS PROG, Ralph Kaden
• WashDC Position Available - z/OS SYSPROG, Jim Marshall
• Re: IBM-MAIN longevity, Linda Mooney
• AUTO: Blair Wyman/Rochester/IBM is out of the office until 10/30/2000. (returning 08/05/2008), Blair Wyman
• z/OS 1.9 Fromnetwork Order Question, Patrick Lyon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 Fromnetwork Order Question, Linda Mooney
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 Fromnetwork Order Question, Patrick Lyon
• Re: IBM-MAIN longevity (was Re: Share Attendance), Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: IBM-MAIN longevity (was Re: Share Attendance), Leonard D Woren
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IBM-MAIN longevity (was Re: Share Attendance), Ed Finnell
  • Re: IBM-MAIN longevity (was Re: Share Attendance), Ed Finnell
• HCM Sample Reports., Ed Finnell
• LISTCAT/SMS QUESTION, willie bunter
  • Re: LISTCAT/SMS QUESTION, Chase, John
  • Re: LISTCAT/SMS QUESTION, John Kington
  • Re: LISTCAT/SMS QUESTION, Hal Merritt
  • Re: ListCat/SMS question, Neil Duffee
  • Re: LISTCAT/SMS QUESTION, Greg Shirey
    • Re: LISTCAT/SMS QUESTION, willie bunter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: LISTCAT/SMS QUESTION, Ed Finnell
  • Re: LISTCAT/SMS QUESTION, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: LISTCAT/SMS QUESTION, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: LISTCAT/SMS QUESTION, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: LISTCAT/SMS QUESTION, Hal Merritt
  • Re: LISTCAT/SMS QUESTION, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: LISTCAT/SMS QUESTION, Hal Merritt
  • Re: LISTCAT/SMS QUESTION, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: LISTCAT/SMS QUESTION, Scott Barry
  • Re: LISTCAT/SMS QUESTION, Scott Barry
• CrossPost - tool for SHARE scheduling (post processor), Lionel B Dyck
• 3745/3746 need a new home, Bielskie, Stephen
• Can you issue a PING command from a TSO ISPF panel? If so please tell, I'm not sure how. - Thanks., CraigH
  • Re: Can you issue a PING command from a TSO ISPF panel? If so please tell, I'm not sure how. - Thanks., billlalonde43
    • Re: Can you issue a PING command from a TSO ISPF panel? If so please tell, I'm not sure how. - Thanks., CraigH
      • Re: Can you issue a PING command from a TSO ISPF panel? If so please tell, I'm not sure how. - Thanks., billlalonde43
• IBM PCI Compliance with z/OS Com Server Seminar, Jim Marshall
  • Re: IBM PCI Compliance with z/OS Com Server Seminar, Bob Shannon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IBM PCI Compliance with z/OS Com Server Seminar, Bri P
    • Re: IBM PCI Compliance with z/OS Com Server Seminar, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: IBM PCI Compliance with z/OS Com Server Seminar, Chris Mason
  • Re: IBM PCI Compliance with z/OS Com Server Seminar, Ed Finnell
  • Re: IBM PCI Compliance with z/OS Com Server Seminar, Patrick O'Keefe
  • Re: IBM PCI Compliance with z/OS Com Server Seminar, Dr. Stephen Fedtke
• OPCA/TWS LIstserver and/or opinions required, andy corpes
  • Re: OPCA/TWS LIstserver and/or opinions required, Dinesh Thakur
    • Re: OPCA/TWS LIstserver and/or opinions required, Dinesh Thakur
• Re: Problems that occur in production, J. Chiampi
• AUTO: James Showalter/ENDS390 is out of the office. (returning 07/31/2008), James Showalter
• Re: SMF type 30, duplicate entries *solved*, Walter Marguccio
• Re: Convert from CA-1 to DFSMSrmm, Tommy Tsui
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Convert from CA-1 to DFSMSrmm, Mike Wood
    • Re: Convert from CA-1 to DFSMSrmm, Tommy Tsui
• Re: Hardware inventory, Ed Finnell
• Re: SCLM in btch, Hal Merritt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SCLM in btch, andy corpes
• Re: Statistics when writing PDS members, Farley, Peter x23353
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Statistics when writing PDS members, William H. Blair
  • Re: Statistics when writing PDS members, Paul Gilmartin
  • Re: Statistics when writing PDS members, Itschak Mugzach
    • Re: Statistics when writing PDS members, Kirk Wolf
• Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, Edward Jaffe
  • Re: Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, Chase, John
    • Re: Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, John Hamman
  • Re: Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, Rugen, Len
    • Re: Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, Ken Porowski
    • Re: Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, Chase, John
      • Re: Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, Eric Bielefeld
      • Re: Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, Kelman, Tom
      • Re: Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, Chase, John
      • Re: Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, Eric Bielefeld
      • Re: Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, Pat Mihalec
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, Ed Finnell
  • Re: Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, Ian S. Worthington
  • Re: Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, Barbara Nitz
    • Re: Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, Skip Robinson
  • Re: Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, Simpson, Matt
  • Re: Wow! Rockin' & Rollin' & the Mainframe Stayed Up!, Ed Finnell
• Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Paul Gilmartin
  • Message not available
    • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Ian S. Worthington
    • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Howard Brazee
      • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
      • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Howard Brazee
      • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
      • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Howard Brazee
  • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Rich Greenberg
      • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Ken Porowski
  • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Ted MacNEIL
• Alan Schenck is out of the office., Alan Schenck
  • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Howard Brazee
    • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Chase, John
      • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Howard Brazee
    • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., McKown, John
      • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Howard Brazee
      • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Darren Evans-Young
      • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Rick Fochtman
    • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Colin Beveridge
      • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Maarten Slegtenhorst
      • Re: (your name here) is out of the office., Chase, John
• Need FDR/ABR IVP Job, Sivakumar, Manikandan
  • Re: Need FDR/ABR IVP Job, Stephen Mednick
• MIDAW and Dynamic Activation, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: MIDAW and Dynamic Activation, Mark Jacobs
    • Re: MIDAW and Dynamic Activation, Knutson, Sam
  • Re: MIDAW and Dynamic Activation, Reda, John
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: MIDAW and Dynamic Activation, , IBM Mainframe Discussion List
• z9BC last POR time, Bri P
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: z9BC last POR time, Bri P
• HSM query, Tommy Tsui
  • Re: HSM query, Richards, Robert B.
• IEF403I when no other console than the HMC, Mauri Kanter
  • Re: IEF403I when no other console than the HMC, Richard Peurifoy
• Re: XCF Coupling Facility Space vs In-Memory Buffers, Barbara Nitz
  • Re: XCF Coupling Facility Space vs In-Memory Buffers, Martin Packer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XCF Coupling Facility Space vs In-Memory Buffers, Brian Peterson
  • Re: XCF Coupling Facility Space vs In-Memory Buffers, Barbara Nitz
    • Sysplex MAXSYS - Impact Of Under- Or Over-Specifying, Martin Packer
• LOAD macro behavior, steve
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: LOAD macro behavior, Binyamin Dissen
    • Re: LOAD macro behavior, Don Holstein
      • Re: LOAD macro behavior, Don Holstein
  • Re: LOAD macro behavior, Peter Relson
• Filezilla 3.1.0.1 broken for z/OS 1.7 and 1.9, Gibney, Dave
  • Re: Filezilla 3.1.0.1 broken for z/OS 1.7 and 1.9, Ulrich Boche
    • Message not available
      • Re: Filezilla 3.1.0.1 broken for z/OS 1.7 and 1.9, Ulrich Boche
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Filezilla 3.1.0.1 broken for z/OS 1.7 and 1.9, Steve Bireley
• SORT SPLICE (?), wecmail
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SORT SPLICE (?), wecmail
• New DFSORT/ICETOOL Features (July, 2008), Frank Yaeger
• DFSORT Functionality to OVERLAY in non-specific columns, Hank Medler
  • Re: DFSORT Functionality to OVERLAY in non-specific columns, Frank Yaeger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DFSORT Functionality to OVERLAY in non-specific columns, Hank Medler
    • Re: DFSORT Functionality to OVERLAY in non-specific columns, Frank Yaeger
• z/OS 1.9 Catalog Enqueue Problems, Rabbe, Luke
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 Catalog Enqueue Problems, Brian France
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 Catalog Enqueue Problems, Steven Conway
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 Catalog Enqueue Problems, Campbell Jay
    • Re: z/OS 1.9 Catalog Enqueue Problems, McKown, John
  • Message not available
    • Re: z/OS 1.9 Catalog Enqueue Problems, Brian France
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 Catalog Enqueue Problems, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 Catalog Enqueue Problems, Ed Finnell
    • Re: z/OS 1.9 Catalog Enqueue Problems, Rabbe, Luke
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 Catalog Enqueue Problems, Ed Finnell
    • Re: z/OS 1.9 Catalog Enqueue Problems, wecmail
• Share Attendance, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: Share Attendance, Tony B.
    • Re: Share Attendance, Lionel B Dyck
  • Re: Share Attendance, Miller, Pat
  • Re: Share Attendance, steve
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Share Attendance, Gary Green
  • Re: Share Attendance, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: Share Attendance, Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: Share Attendance, Chase, John
      • Re: Share Attendance, Graeme Gibson
      • Re: Share Attendance, Ed Castro
      • Re: Share Attendance, Edward Jaffe
    • Re: Share Attendance, Wayne Driscoll
  • Re: Share Attendance, Ed Finnell
    • Re: Share Attendance, John P Kalinich
  • Re: Share Attendance, Ed Finnell
    • IBM-MAIN longevity (was Re: Share Attendance), Leonard D Woren
      • Re: IBM-MAIN longevity, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
      • Re: IBM-MAIN longevity, Ken Porowski
      • Re: IBM-MAIN longevity, John P Kalinich
      • Re: IBM-MAIN longevity, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
      • Re: IBM-MAIN longevity, Ken Porowski
      • Re: IBM-MAIN longevity, Howard Brazee
      • Bruce Black #2 all-time (was Re: IBM-MAIN longevity), Pinnacle
• Transactional Memory, McKown, John
  • Re: Transactional Memory, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
  • Message not available
    • XCF Coupling Facility Space vs In-Memory Buffers, Martin Packer
• JES2-L is moribund!, Jack Kelly
  • Re: JES2-L is moribund!, William H. Blair
• SyncSort - X2C - HEX inverted, ruwu
• control block including JOBID in case of WLM-managed jobs, Dr. Stephen Fedtke
  • Re: control block including JOBID in case of WLM-managed jobs, McKown, John
• PCI Security Compliance Workshop in Dallas, Timothy Sipples
• Re: CBT647, JCL2XML: Request for private contact, others please ignore, Farley, Peter x23353
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CBT647, JCL2XML: Request for private contact, others please ignore, Ed Finnell
• Re: JES2-L, Ed Finnell
• Emergency, Tsai Laurence
  • Re: Emergency, P S
    • Re: Emergency, Steve Flynn
• Paging Question, james smith
  • Re: Paging Question, Rugen, Len
    • Re: Paging Question, Rick Fochtman
      • Re: Paging Question, Rugen, Len
  • Re: Paging Question, Rick Fochtman
    • Message not available
      • Re: Paging Question, Rick Fochtman
    • Re: Paging Question, Roach, Dennis
• AUTO: James Obrizok is out of the office (returning 08/04/2008), James Obrizok
• Foreign 3590, Lucy Arnold
  • Re: Foreign 3590, Barry Jones
  • Re: Foreign 3590, Mark Pace
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Foreign 3590, Linda Mooney
  • Re: Foreign 3590, Neil Duffee
    • Message not available
      • Re: Foreign 3590, Neil Duffee
• VSAM RPL RETURN CODE, Richard Verville
  • Re: VSAM RPL RETURN CODE, Tom Harper
  • Re: VSAM RPL RETURN CODE, McKown, John
  • Re: VSAM RPL RETURN CODE, steve
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: VSAM RPL RETURN CODE, Thompson, Steve
    • Re: VSAM RPL RETURN CODE, Richard Verville
      • Re: VSAM RPL RETURN CODE, Richard Verville
      • Re: VSAM RPL RETURN CODE, Larry Crilley
• JES2 EXIT 52 - JCTCLASS, Dooley, Robert
  • Re: JES2 EXIT 52 - JCTCLASS, eBob.com
  • Re: JES2 EXIT 52 - JCTCLASS, Bob Rutledge
  • Re: JES2 EXIT 52 - JCTCLASS, Jack Schudel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JES2 EXIT 52 - JCTCLASS, Dooley, Robert
  • Re: JES2 EXIT 52 - JCTCLASS, Bill Planer
  • Re: JES2 EXIT 52 - JCTCLASS, Ted MacNEIL
    • JES2-L, William H. Blair
• Automating message CBR3750I, Lizette Koehler
• FW: [IBMTCP-L] segmentationoffload, Mansell, George R.
  • Re: FW: [IBMTCP-L] segmentationoffload, Scott Rowe
    • Re: FW: [IBMTCP-L] segmentationoffload, Mansell, George R.
      • Re: FW: [IBMTCP-L] segmentationoffload, Scott Rowe
      • Re: FW: [IBMTCP-L] segmentationoffload, Mansell, George R.
      • Re: FW: [IBMTCP-L] segmentationoffload, Scott Rowe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FW: [IBMTCP-L] segmentationoffload, Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: FW: [IBMTCP-L] segmentationoffload, Mansell, George R.
  • Re: FW: [IBMTCP-L] segmentationoffload, Brian Peterson
• APF authorized, but not, mvsguy
  • Re: APF authorized, but not, Richard Peurifoy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • APF authorized, but not, Big Iron
  • Re: APF authorized, but not, Peter Relson
• Re: Sysplex HFS/zFS Sharing; was Re: Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, Arthur Gutowski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sysplex HFS/zFS Sharing; was Re: Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, Mark Zelden
• SORT question, Dave Menist
  • Re: SORT question, ruwu
    • Re: SORT question, Dave Menist
• survey sasy: COMMANDxx or IODF ?, J Ellis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: survey sasy: COMMANDxx or IODF ?, Mark Zelden
  • Re: survey sasy: COMMANDxx or IODF ?, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
    • Re: survey sasy: COMMANDxx or IODF ?, Mueller, David
      • Re: survey sasy: COMMANDxx or IODF ?, R.S.
      • Re: survey sasy: COMMANDxx or IODF ?, Itschak Mugzach
      • Re: survey sasy: COMMANDxx or IODF ?, R.S.
• Scientific Users?, Ed Finnell
• FTP from windows to z/os error code 451, Gilbert Cardenas
  • Re: FTP from windows to z/os error code 451, Ulrich Krueger
  • Re: FTP from windows to z/os error code 451, Earl Buhrmester
  • Re: FTP from windows to z/os error code 451, Gil
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FTP from windows to z/os error code 451, Gilbert Cardenas
  • Re: FTP from windows to z/os error code 451, Gilbert Cardenas
  • Re: FTP from windows to z/os error code 451, Big Iron
• BMC Control-M Interface Program, Laine, Rogers
• sub=mstr, Dave Day
  • Re: sub=mstr, Edward Jaffe
    • Re: sub=mstr, Dave Day
      • Re: sub=mstr, Bob Rutledge
      • Re: sub=mstr, van der Grijn, Bart , B
      • Re: sub=mstr, Dave Day
  • Re: sub=mstr, Scott Rowe
  • Re: sub=mstr, Wayne Driscoll
• Re: DFSORT/ICETOOL RE: Compare mismatched member names (was OMVS FILE SYSTEM HANG), Chase, John
• UNIX2DOS in ZOS/UNIX Environment, Oswaldo Matos
  • Re: UNIX2DOS in ZOS/UNIX Environment, John McKown
• HSM Recalls, Mark Steely
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: HSM Recalls, Big Iron
  • Re: HSM Recalls, Alex
    • Re: HSM Recalls, Farley, Peter x23353
      • Re: HSM Recalls, Adams, Rick
      • Re: HSM Recalls, Mark Steely
      • Re: HSM Recalls, Gibney, Dave
    • Message not available
      • Re: HSM Recalls, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: HSM Recalls, Itschak Mugzach
      • Re: HSM Recalls, Stephen Y Odo
      • Re: HSM Recalls, Mark Steely
  • Re: HSM Recalls, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: HSM Recalls, Michael Wickman
      • Re: HSM Recalls, O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT
      • Re: HSM Recalls, Adams, Rick
  • Re: HSM Recalls, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
    • Re: HSM Recalls, Richards, Robert B.
    • Re: HSM Recalls, Jack Kelly
  • Re: HSM Recalls, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
    • Re: HSM Recalls, Richards, Robert B.
  • Re: HSM Recalls, Duane Reaugh
  • Re: HSM Recalls, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
• PK69442 SDSF Slow Response, Craig Bakken
  • Re: PK69442 SDSF Slow Response, Mark Steely
    • Re: PK69442 SDSF Slow Response, Craig Bakken
• Fw:REXX/CLIST, Ron Wells
  • Re: REXX/CLIST, Farley, Peter x23353
• secure ftp on the mainframe, Kurt Eastwood
  • Re: secure ftp on the mainframe, R.S.
  • Re: secure ftp on the mainframe, Wissink, Brad [ITSYS]
  • Re: secure ftp on the mainframe, Chase, John
  • Re: secure ftp on the mainframe, Hal Merritt
    • Re: secure ftp on the mainframe, McKown, John
      • Re: secure ftp on the mainframe, Itschak Mugzach
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: secure ftp on the mainframe, Walt Farrell
  • Re: secure ftp on the mainframe, Walt Farrell
  • secure ftp on the mainframe, Kurt Eastwood
  • Re: secure ftp on the mainframe, Walt Farrell
    • Re: secure ftp on the mainframe, Kirk Wolf
      • Hardware inventory, Jon Brock
      • Re: Hardware inventory, McKown, John
      • Re: Hardware inventory, Hal Merritt
      • Re: Hardware inventory, Jon Brock
      • Re: Hardware inventory, Hal Merritt
    • Re: secure ftp on the mainframe, Hal Merritt
      • Re: secure ftp on the mainframe, Rafael Fernandez L.
• MULC Charging Question, Evans, Richard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: MULC Charging Question, Brian Peterson
  • Re: MULC Charging Question, Ted MacNEIL
• OMVS FILE SYSTEM HANG, Magen Margalit
  • Re: OMVS FILE SYSTEM HANG, Veilleux, Jon L
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OMVS FILE SYSTEM HANG, Bruno Sugliani
    • Re: OMVS FILE SYSTEM HANG, Veilleux, Jon L
      • Re: OMVS FILE SYSTEM HANG, Ron Wells
      • Re: OMVS FILE SYSTEM HANG, Horne, Jim - James S
      • Compare mismatched member names (was OMVS FILE SYSTEM HANG), Schwarz, Barry A
      • DFSORT/ICETOOL RE: Compare mismatched member names (was OMVS FILE SYSTEM HANG), Chase, John
  • Re: OMVS FILE SYSTEM HANG, Mark Zelden
• Re: SDSF syslog slow access, was: Dump management, Barbara Nitz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SDSF syslog slow access, was: Dump management, Big Iron
• VSAM dataset - when was it last accessed??, Mike Baker
  • Re: VSAM dataset - when was it last accessed??, Gil
  • Re: VSAM dataset - when was it last accessed??, McKown, John
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: VSAM dataset - when was it last accessed??, Mark Zelden
• Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 - Green card confusion, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 - Green card confusion, Farley, Peter x23353
• PCI compliance: safe havens, internal network encryption, and eCom vendors, trying to comply
• Re: IBM 029 keypunch -- 0-8-2 overpunch -- what hex code results?, Tom Marchant
• Getting from VSCobol to zCobol in CICS gracefully wiht MacKinney's RM31, John Mattson
• Enterprise Scheduler, Kurt Eastwood
  • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Gil
  • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Hal Merritt
    • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Jerry Fuchs
      • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Pat Mihalec
      • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Jerry Fuchs
    • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Eric Bielefeld
      • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Kirk Wolf
      • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Kelman, Tom
  • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Gerry Palmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Bruno Sugliani
  • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Jerry Fuchs
  • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, McKown, John
    • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Greg Shirey
      • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, R.S.
  • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Timothy Sipples
  • Enterprise Scheduler, Kurt Eastwood
  • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, R.S.
  • Re: Enterprise Scheduler, Ted MacNEIL
• Re: Card Code, Ron Wells
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Card Code, Ed Finnell
  • Re: Card Code, Big Iron
  • Re: Card Code, Ed Finnell
• Workload Manager (WLM) and CUoD, krief . jonathan
• strange module SSASQLIB, Pawel Leszczynski
  • Re: strange module SSASQLIB, Cebell, David
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: strange module SSASQLIB, Mark Zelden
    • Re: strange module SSASQLIB, tom . erickson
• PL/1 DB2 V8 Table Declaration for a CLOB, msmithuk
• MCS console simulator on the CBT Tape, Wayne Taylor
• Use of Symbol, Daniel McLaughlin
  • Re: Use of Symbol, Lizette Koehler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Use of Symbol, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
  • Re: Use of Symbol, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Use of Symbol, Tom Marchant
    • Re: Use of Symbol, George Fogg
      • IBM 029 keypunch -- 0-8-2 overpunch -- what hex code results?, Mark Waterbury
      • Re: IBM 029 keypunch -- 0-8-2 overpunch -- what hex code results?, Staller, Allan
      • Re: IBM 029 keypunch -- 0-8-2 overpunch -- what hex code results?, Tony Harminc
      • Re: IBM 029 keypunch -- 0-8-2 overpunch -- what hex code results?, William H. Blair
      • Re: IBM 029 keypunch -- 0-8-2 overpunch -- what hex code results?, Tony Harminc
      • Re: IBM 029 keypunch -- 0-8-2 overpunch -- what hex code results?, Robert A. Rosenberg
  • Re: Use of Symbol, Arthur Gutowski
• NVAS and REXX, Roberto R.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: NVAS and REXX, Roberto R.
• Identifying non z/OS volumes online to a z/OS system, Charles
• z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Timothy Sipples
  • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Wayne Driscoll
    • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Wayne Driscoll
      • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Wayne Driscoll
    • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Tony Harminc
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Timothy Sipples
  • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Ian S. Worthington
    • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Chase, John
  • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, David J. Chase
    • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Ceruti, Gerard G
      • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Mark Post
      • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Wayne Driscoll
      • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Mark Post
      • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Wayne Driscoll
      • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Mike
    • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Edward Jaffe
  • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Ed Finnell
  • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Linda Mooney
    • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Mark Post
      • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, McKown, John
  • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Linda Mooney
    • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Chase, John
  • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Dave Cartwright
  • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Alan Altmark
  • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Jim Marshall
    • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Wayne Driscoll
  • Re: z/VM Evaluation Edition Now Available, Alan Altmark
• Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, John Mattson
  • Re: Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, Pat Mihalec
    • Re: Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, McKown, John
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, Matthew Stitt
    • Re: Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, Staller, Allan
  • Re: Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, Matthew Stitt
  • Re: Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, Arthur Gutowski
  • Re: Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, Arthur Gutowski
  • Re: Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, Arthur Gutowski
  • Re: Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Delete PAGESPACE in other catalog, Mark Zelden
• Branch Entry Catalog, Leonard D Woren
• Interesting problem with CONSOLE ACTIVATE, Hal Merritt
  • Re: Interesting problem with CONSOLE ACTIVATE, Martin Packer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Interesting problem with CONSOLE ACTIVATE, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Interesting problem with CONSOLE ACTIVATE, Brian Peterson
    • Re: Interesting problem with CONSOLE ACTIVATE, Hal Merritt
• SMS Confusion, Daniel McLaughlin
  • Re: SMS Confusion, John Kington
  • Re: SMS Confusion, O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SMS Confusion, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: SMS Confusion, Daniel McLaughlin
    • Re: SMS Confusion, O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT
• SWAP command, wndavis
• Re: Using COBOL to create a DSNTYPE=LARGE dataset, Itschak Mugzach
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Using COBOL to create a DSNTYPE=LARGE dataset, R.S.
  • Re: Using COBOL to create a DSNTYPE=LARGE dataset, Itschak Mugzach
  • Re: Using COBOL to create a DSNTYPE=LARGE dataset, Bruno Sugliani
• Some insight on 1.9 install, Gibney, Dave
  • Re: Some insight on 1.9 install, Itschak Mugzach
  • Re: Some insight on 1.9 install, e'Silva, Joaquim J
  • Re: Some insight on 1.9 install, Lizette Koehler
    • Re: Some insight on 1.9 install, Gibney, Dave
      • Re: Some insight on 1.9 install, Staller, Allan
      • Re: Some insight on 1.9 install, Gibney, Dave
      • Re: Some insight on 1.9 install, Bob Rutledge
      • Re: Some insight on 1.9 install, Gibney, Dave
      • Re: Some insight on 1.9 install, Staller, Allan
  • Re: Some insight on 1.9 install, Neal Eckhardt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Some insight on 1.9 install, Lizette Koehler
• Re: IT Support (WAS: Example of what a very small ...), Ted MacNEIL
• Tracing USS IP flows, Ian S. Worthington
  • Re: Tracing USS IP flows, David Andrews
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Tracing USS IP flows, Bruno Sugliani
  • Re: Tracing USS IP flows, Chris Mason
  • Re: Tracing USS IP flows, Chris Mason
• OPERLOG IEAMDBLG and z/OS V1.9, Lizette Koehler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OPERLOG IEAMDBLG and z/OS V1.9, Mark Zelden
  • Re: OPERLOG IEAMDBLG and z/OS V1.9, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: OPERLOG IEAMDBLG and z/OS V1.9, Mark Zelden
  • Re: OPERLOG IEAMDBLG and z/OS V1.9, Barbara Nitz
• capturing healthcheck report in batch mode, Kim Nguyen
  • Re: capturing healthcheck report in batch mode, Knutson, Sam
• Landmark Reunion, Knutson, Sam
• Interesting Article, Gary Green
  • Re: Interesting Article, kmbadi@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dump management, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Dump management, Mark Jacobs
    • Re: Dump management, Rick Fochtman
      • Re: Dump management, Mark Jacobs
      • Re: Dump management, Jerry Durbin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Dump management, Mark Zelden
    • Re: Dump management, Rick Fochtman
  • Re: Dump management, Bruce Hewson
  • Re: Dump management, Barbara Nitz
  • Re: Dump management, Mark Zelden
    • Re: Dump management, Eric Bielefeld
  • Re: Dump management, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Dump management, Barbara Nitz
  • Re: Dump management, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Dump management, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Dump management, Mark Zelden
• z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Horne, Jim - James S
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, John Eells
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Jim Mulder
    • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Shane Ginnane
      • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Jim Mulder
      • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Shane Ginnane
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Mark Zelden
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Ed Finnell
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Arthur T.
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Mark Zelden
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Brian Kenny
    • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Martin Packer
      • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Rick Fochtman
      • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Martin Packer
    • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Gray, Larry - Larry A
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Richard Pinion
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Brian Kenny
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Ed Finnell
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Mark Zelden
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 System Commands Memory Reconfiguration Issue, Mark Zelden
• FTP with LF instead of CRLF from a Unix client, Bri P
  • Re: FTP with LF instead of CRLF from a Unix client, McKown, John
    • Re: FTP with LF instead of CRLF from a Unix client, McKown, John
  • Re: FTP with LF instead of CRLF from a Unix client, McKown, John
• Dyamic FTP Control Cards, Rajeev
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Dyamic FTP Control Cards, Scott Barry
  • Re: Dyamic FTP Control Cards, Jan MOEYERSONS
• Test; please ignore, Dave Salt
  • Re: Test; please ignore, Steve Comstock
  • Re: Test; please ignore, John McKown
• IEWBIND S0C4 on a GETD, steve
• IEBGENER, Magen Margalit
  • Re: IEBGENER, Itschak Mugzach
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IEBGENER, Magen Margalit
    • Re: IEBGENER, Joel C. Ewing
  • Re: IEBGENER, Bruce Richardson
• Instruction sets (or facilities), Pierre Fichaud
• Re: RRS/DB2 JDBC definition and implementation, Kenneth E Tomiak
• Re: FILTER cmd not working in batch SDSF?, Kenneth E Tomiak
  • Re: FILTER cmd not working in batch SDSF?, Farley, Peter x23353
    • Re: FILTER cmd not working in batch SDSF?, Farley, Peter x23353
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FILTER cmd not working in batch SDSF?, Kenneth E Tomiak
    • Re: FILTER cmd not working in batch SDSF?, Farley, Peter x23353
  • Re: FILTER cmd not working in batch SDSF?, Kenneth E Tomiak
• Numeric TSO Userids, Mark Wilson
  • Re: Numeric TSO Userids, Gerhard Postpischil
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • FW: Numeric TSO Userids, Mark Wilson
    • Re: Numeric TSO Userids, Itschak Mugzach
    • Re: Numeric TSO Userids, Itschak Mugzach
  • Re: Numeric TSO Userids, Thompson, Steve
    • Re: Numeric TSO Userids, Thompson, Steve
  • Re: Numeric TSO Userids, Mark Wilson
    • Re: Numeric TSO Userids, Chase, John
  • Re: Numeric TSO Userids, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
  • Re: Numeric TSO Userids, Mark Wilson
  • Fw: Numeric TSO Userids, Ted MacNEIL
• Larry J Brown is out of the office., Larry J Brown
  • FILTER cmd not working in batch SDSF?, Farley, Peter x23353
    • Re: FILTER cmd not working in batch SDSF?, Bass, Walter W
      • Re: FILTER cmd not working in batch SDSF?, Farley, Peter x23353
• IOS Dump, Eatherly, John D [EQ]
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IOS Dump, Mark Zelden
    • Re: IOS Dump, Eatherly, John D [EQ]
      • Re: IOS Dump, Eatherly, John D [EQ]
• A simple question, but not for the youngsters, Glen Gunselman
  • Re: A simple question, but not for the youngsters, Jim Phoenix
    • Re: A simple question, but not for the youngsters, Glen Gunselman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A simple question, but not for the youngsters, Linda Mooney
• SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 Starter System for IBM System z, Mark Post
  • Re: SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 Starter System for IBM System z, Chase, John
• PUT Method of z/os HTTP Web Server, Mary Kay Tubello
  • Re: PUT Method of z/os HTTP Web Server, Steve Comstock
  • Re: PUT Method of z/os HTTP Web Server, Barkow, Eileen
  • Re: PUT Method of z/os HTTP Web Server, Roger Bolan
    • Re: PUT Method of z/os HTTP Web Server, Steve Comstock
      • Re: PUT Method of z/os HTTP Web Server, Roger Bolan
      • Re: PUT Method of z/os HTTP Web Server, Roger Bolan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PUT Method of z/os HTTP Web Server, Kenneth E Tomiak
• Multi CSS configuration on z9 processor, Bruce Hewson
  • Re: Multi CSS configuration on z9 processor, pauls2272
  • Re: Multi CSS configuration on z9 processor, R.S.
• DFHSM question: hdelete uncatalogued dsn, McKown, John
  • Re: DFHSM question: hdelete uncatalogued dsn, O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT
    • Re: DFHSM question: hdelete uncatalogued dsn, McKown, John
      • Re: DFHSM question: hdelete uncatalogued dsn, O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT
      • Re: DFHSM question: hdelete uncatalogued dsn, Darth Keller
      • Re: DFHSM question: hdelete uncatalogued dsn, Darth Keller
      • Re: DFHSM question: hdelete uncatalogued dsn, McKown, John
  • Re: DFHSM question: hdelete uncatalogued dsn, Gil
• Re: DSN wirh LRECL > 32760 on Z/OS, Sarel Swanepoel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DSN wirh LRECL > 32760 on Z/OS, Kenneth E Tomiak
  • Re: DSN wirh LRECL > 32760 on Z/OS, Paul Gilmartin
    • Message not available
      • Re: DSN with LRECL > 32760 on Z/OS, Roach, Dennis
• DFHSM: setsys exportesds(cimode), Arturo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DFHSM: setsys exportesds(cimode), Arturo
• IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Timothy Sipples
  • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Kelman, Tom
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Timothy Sipples
    • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Edward Jaffe
  • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Timothy Sipples
    • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
  • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Timothy Sipples
  • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Ed Finnell
  • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Timothy Sipples
  • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Ed Finnell
  • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Schwartz, Alan
    • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Pinnacle
    • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, R.S.
      • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Roger Bolan
      • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, R.S.
      • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Martin Packer
  • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Timothy Sipples
    • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
    • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
    • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
  • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Ed Finnell
  • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, R.S.
      • Re: IBM's 2Q2008 Earnings, David Crayford
• State of IDAHO feedback, Anton Britz
  • Re: State of IDAHO feedback, Roger Bolan
  • Re: State of IDAHO feedback, Doug Fuerst
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: State of IDAHO feedback, Ed Finnell
  • Re: State of IDAHO feedback, Kenneth E Tomiak
    • Re: State of IDAHO feedback, R.S.
• Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN), Ed Finnell
  • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN), Bobbie Justice
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN), Ted MacNEIL
• TLMS ALOG, Daniel McLaughlin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TLMS ALOG, Bruce Richardson
• SMF TYPE 60 REPORTS, Judy Ellis
  • Re: SMF TYPE 60 REPORTS, Bob Shannon
  • Re: SMF TYPE 60 REPORTS, Rick Fochtman
    • Re: SMF TYPE 60 REPORTS, Eric Bielefeld
      • Re: SMF TYPE 60 REPORTS, Rick Fochtman
      • Re: SMF TYPE 60 REPORTS, Jerry Fuchs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SMF TYPE 60 REPORTS, Ed Finnell
  • Re: SMF TYPE 60 REPORTS, Judy Ellis
  • Re: SMF TYPE 60 REPORTS, Ted MacNEIL
• Terminal SYSIN in TSO Logon Proc, Lindy Mayfield
  • Re: Terminal SYSIN in TSO Logon Proc, McKown, John
    • Re: Terminal SYSIN in TSO Logon Proc, Itschak Mugzach
      • Re: Terminal SYSIN in TSO Logon Proc, Tony Harminc
      • Re: Terminal SYSIN in TSO Logon Proc, Lindy Mayfield
      • Re: Terminal SYSIN in TSO Logon Proc, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Terminal SYSIN in TSO Logon Proc, Itschak Mugzach
      • Re: Terminal SYSIN in TSO Logon Proc, John P Kalinich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Terminal SYSIN in TSO Logon Proc, Thompson, Steve
  • Re: Terminal SYSIN in TSO Logon Proc, Kenneth E Tomiak
    • Re: Terminal SYSIN in TSO Logon Proc, Lindy Mayfield
  • Re: Terminal SYSIN in TSO Logon Proc, Ted MacNEIL
• Re: Disappearing JES2 output - found it!, Barbara Nitz
• recreating deleted dataset, Errol Van staden
  • Re: recreating deleted dataset, Kelman, Tom
    • Re: recreating deleted dataset, Veilleux, Jon L
    • Re: recreating deleted dataset, Errol
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • recreating deleted dataset, David J. Chase
    • Re: recreating deleted dataset, Kelman, Tom
• Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., John Mattson
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., William H. Blair
    • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Neal Eckhardt
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Mark Zelden
    • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Scott Rowe
      • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Roger Bolan
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Bruno Sugliani
    • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Gibney, Dave
      • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., William H. Blair
      • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., McKown, John
      • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Matthew Stitt
    • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Mark Zelden
    • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Chase, John
      • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., J R
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Tom Marchant
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Patrick O'Keefe
  • Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., John Mattson
    • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Rick Fochtman
      • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., McKown, John
      • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Rick Fochtman
      • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Clark Morris
      • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., McKown, John
      • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Don Leahy
      • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Howard Brazee
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Jeff Holst
    • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., William H. Blair
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Jeff Holst
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Paul Gilmartin
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., , IBM Mainframe Discussion List
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Paul Gilmartin
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., , IBM Mainframe Discussion List
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Jeff Holst
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Paul Gilmartin
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Jeff Holst
  • Re: Example of what a very small JCL Interpreter can do to your installation., Jeff Holst
• HSM recall on one LPAR for request on another lpar, John Mattson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: HSM recall on one LPAR for request on another lpar, Ted MacNEIL
  • HSM recall on one LPAR for request on another lpar, John Mattson
    • Re: HSM recall on one LPAR for request on another lpar, O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT
  • Re: HSM recall on one LPAR for request on another lpar, , IBM Mainframe Discussion List
  • Re: HSM recall on one LPAR for request on another lpar, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: HSM recall on one LPAR for request on another lpar, Skip Robinson
• SDSF "I" (Input) Screen with z/OS 1.9, Curt Thompson
  • Re: SDSF "I" (Input) Screen with z/OS 1.9, Chase, John
  • Re: SDSF "I" (Input) Screen with z/OS 1.9, Staller, Allan
  • Re: SDSF "I" (Input) Screen with z/OS 1.9, Skip Robinson
    • z/OS 1.9 SDSF (Was: SDSF "I" (Input) Screen with z/OS 1.9), Edward Jaffe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SDSF "I" (Input) Screen with z/OS 1.9, Mark Zelden
• Format of the CAXWA in z/OS V1R8 and above, Stu
• IODF change causes next IPL to "hang", Stephen Wolf
  • Re: IODF change causes next IPL to "hang", Skip Robinson
  • Re: IODF change causes next IPL to "hang", Hal Merritt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IODF change causes next IPL to "hang", Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: IODF change causes next IPL to "hang", Field, Alan C.
      • Re: IODF change causes next IPL to "hang", Jim Mulder
      • Re: IODF change causes next IPL to "hang", Chase, John
      • Re: IODF change causes next IPL to "hang", Jim Mulder
      • Re: IODF change causes next IPL to "hang", Skip Robinson
  • Re: IODF change causes next IPL to "hang", Mark Zelden
  • Re: IODF change causes next IPL to "hang", Mark Zelden
  • Re: IODF change causes next IPL to "hang", Brian Peterson
  • Re: IODF change causes next IPL to "hang", Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: IODF change causes next IPL to "hang", Shane
  • Re: IODF change causes next IPL to "hang", Barbara Nitz
  • Re: IODF change causes next IPL to "hang", Mark Zelden
    • Dump management, Shane Ginnane
      • Re: Dump management, Mark Jacobs
      • Re: Dump management, Chase, John
• Stupid ServerPac question, Jack Kelly
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Stupid ServerPac question, Matthew Stitt
    • Re: Stupid ServerPac question, Jack Kelly
• z/OS 1.9 SDSF PE PTF UA40949, Jim Chappell
• Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Mark Zelden
  • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Mark Pace
    • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Knutson, Sam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Thompson, Steve
  • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Mark Pace
      • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN), Bobbie Justice
      • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN), Mark Pace
  • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Edward Jaffe
  • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Earl Buhrmester
• Disappearing JES2 output, Barbara Nitz
  • Re: Disappearing JES2 output, Hal Merritt
  • Re: Disappearing JES2 output, William H. Blair
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Disappearing JES2 output, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Disappearing JES2 output, Barbara Nitz
    • Re: Disappearing JES2 output, Hal Merritt
  • Re: Disappearing JES2 output, Ed Finnell
  • Re: Disappearing JES2 output, Barbara Nitz
    • Re: Disappearing JES2 output, William H. Blair
      • Re: Disappearing JES2 output, William H. Blair
  • Re: Disappearing JES2 output, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
  • Re: Disappearing JES2 output, Barbara Nitz
  • Re: Disappearing JES2 output, Bruno Sugliani
  • Re: Disappearing JES2 output, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Disappearing JES2 output, Brian Westerman
  • Re: Disappearing JES2 output, Collinson.Shannon
  • Re: Disappearing JES2 output, Barbara Nitz
• OPERLOG staging datasets out of sync in sysplex, martin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OPERLOG staging datasets out of sync in sysplex, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
  • Re: OPERLOG staging datasets out of sync in sysplex, Barbara Nitz
• Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
  • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Bobbie Justice
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
    • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Chase, John
    • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Mark Pace
      • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Dean Montevago
• Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap - remoarks, Itschak Mugzach
• Serverpac Divergence?, Gibney, Dave
  • Re: Serverpac Divergence?, Jousma, David
    • Re: Serverpac Divergence?, John Eells
  • Re: Serverpac Divergence?, John Eells
• IKJ144I UNDEFINED USERID(S) XXXXXXX, Angel Tamayo
  • Re: IKJ144I UNDEFINED USERID(S) XXXXXXX, Hal Merritt
  • Re: IKJ144I UNDEFINED USERID(S) XXXXXXX, Roach, Dennis
    • Re: IKJ144I UNDEFINED USERID(S) XXXXXXX, Angel Tamayo
      • Re: IKJ144I UNDEFINED USERID(S) XXXXXXX, Itschak Mugzach
      • Re: IKJ144I UNDEFINED USERID(S) XXXXXXX, Angel Tamayo
• Clearing out DASD, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: Clearing out DASD, Staller, Allan
  • Re: Clearing out DASD, McKown, John
  • Re: Clearing out DASD, Gil
  • Re: Clearing out DASD, Hal Merritt
  • Re: Clearing out DASD, Schwarz, Barry A
    • Re: Clearing out DASD, Pat Mihalec
      • Re: Clearing out DASD, Schwarz, Barry A
      • Re: Clearing out DASD, Stephen Mednick
    • Re: Clearing out DASD, Staller, Allan
  • Re: Clearing out DASD, Stephen Mednick
  • Re: Clearing out DASD, Bruce McKnight
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Clearing out DASD, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: Clearing out DASD, Linda Mooney
• Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Eric Bielefeld
    • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Jon Brock
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Gibney, Dave
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Jack Kelly
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Jon Brock
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Mark Zelden
    • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Jousma, David
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Pinnacle
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Jousma, David
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Jousma, David
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Pat Mihalec
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Pinnacle
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, McKown, John
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Jeffrey Deaver
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Pinnacle
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Jousma, David
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Pinnacle
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Pat Mihalec
  • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Kenneth E Tomiak
• Circular buffer, Ward, Mike S
  • Re: Circular buffer, Rob Scott
  • Re: Circular buffer, Hal Merritt
    • Re: Circular buffer, J R
• FTP Temporary File, rajeev.v@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: FTP Temporary File, Gray, Larry - Larry A
  • Re: FTP Temporary File, McKown, John
    • Re: FTP Temporary File, McKown, John
    • Re: FTP Temporary File, Ulrich Krueger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FTP Temporary File, Rajeev
    • Re: FTP Temporary File, Veilleux, Jon L
  • Re: FTP Temporary File, Bri P
  • Re: FTP Temporary File, Brain
  • Re: FTP Temporary File, Patrick O'Keefe
  • Re: FTP Temporary File, Brain
    • Re: FTP Temporary File, Horne, Jim - James S
  • Re: FTP Temporary File, Mark Zelden
    • Re: FTP Temporary File, Mansell, George R.
• Disaster in the making, Gary Green
  • Re: Disaster in the making, Rick Fochtman
    • Re: Disaster in the making, Hal Merritt
      • Re: Disaster in the making, Gray, Larry - Larry A
      • Re: Disaster in the making, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
      • Re: Disaster in the making, Rick Fochtman
    • Re: Disaster in the making, Howard Brazee
    • Re: Disaster in the making, Chase, John
      • Re: Disaster in the making, Howard Brazee
• SDSF Performance APAR 0A24615, Jim Marshall
  • OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Bobbie Justice
    • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Chase, John
      • Re: OUR FRIEND WEB IBMLINK is DOWN (AGAIN) - YES, I''M SHOCKED AND SURPRISED TOO, Edward Jaffe
  • Re: SDSF Performance APAR 0A24615, George Fogg
    • Re: SDSF Performance APAR 0A24615, Ulrich Krueger
      • Re: SDSF Performance APAR 0A24615, George Fogg
• Admin: echo'ed posts?, McKown, John
  • Re: Admin: echo'ed posts?, Mark Pace
  • Re: Admin: echo'ed posts?, Dave Salt
  • Re: Admin: echo'ed posts? are coming from a TIMEINC.COM subscriber's email server, William H. Blair
    • Re: Admin: echo'ed posts? are coming from a TIMEINC.COM subscriber's email server, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: Admin: echo'ed posts?, Schwarz, Barry A
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Admin: echo'ed posts?, Tom Marchant
  • Re: Admin: echo'ed posts?, Ed Finnell
• New important update., Shai Hess
• Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO), Barbara Nitz
  • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO), Bob Shannon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO), Keith E. Moe
  • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO), Barbara Nitz
  • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO), Peter Relson
    • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO), Ray Overby
  • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO), Andy Wood
  • ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO), Stephen Hall
    • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO), Jim Mulder
  • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO), Brian Peterson
• Re: European BCP Regulations?, Timothy Sipples
  • Re: European BCP Regulations?, Patrick Falcone
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: European BCP Regulations?, Bruno Sugliani
  • Re: European BCP Regulations?, Bri P
    • Re: European BCP Regulations?, Hal Merritt
      • Re: European BCP Regulations?, Rick Fochtman
      • Re: European BCP Regulations?, Hal Merritt
  • Re: European BCP Regulations?, Barbara Nitz
    • Re: European BCP Regulations?, R.S.
      • Re: European BCP Regulations?, Rick Fochtman
      • Re: European BCP Regulations?, McKown, John
      • Re: European BCP Regulations?, Staller, Allan
    • Re: European BCP Regulations?, McKown, John
      • Re: European BCP Regulations?, Rick Fochtman
    • Re: European BCP Regulations?, Rick Fochtman
  • Re: European BCP Regulations?, Timothy Sipples
    • Re: European BCP Regulations?, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
      • Re: European BCP Regulations?, McKown, John
      • Re: European BCP Regulations?, Rick Fochtman
  • Re: European BCP Regulations?, Ted MacNEIL
• MQ security, McKown, John
  • Re: MQ security, Jousma, David
    • Re: MQ security, McKown, John
  • European BCP Regulations?, Jeffrey Deaver
  • Re: MQ security, Jacky Bright
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: MQ security, Roger Lowe
    • Re: MQ security, McKown, John
  • Re: MQ security, Roger Lowe
    • Re: MQ security, McKown, John
      • Re: MQ security, Itschak Mugzach
      • Re: MQ security, McKown, John
  • Re: MQ security, Walt Farrell
    • Re: MQ security, McKown, John
      • Re: MQ security, Chase, John
      • Re: MQ security, McKown, John
• Re: Unix System Services File Space Used, Pommier, Rex R.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Unix System Services File Space Used, Robert Sample
  • Re: Unix System Services File Space Used, Mark Zelden
    • Re: Unix System Services File Space Used, Lindy Mayfield
  • Re: Unix System Services File Space Used, Mark Jacobs
  • Re: Unix System Services File Space Used, Veilleux, Jon L
  • Re: Unix System Services File Space Used, McKown, John
    • Re: Unix System Services File Space Used, Staller, Allan
      • Re: Unix System Services File Space Used, Lindy Mayfield
      • Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Jon Brock
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, McKown, John
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Jon Brock
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, John Kington
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Jon Brock
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, John Kington
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Traylor, Terry
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Chase, John
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Traylor, Terry
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Cebell, David
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Jon Brock
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Pat Mihalec
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Pat Mihalec
      • Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9, Richards, Robert B.
  • Re: Unix System Services File Space Used, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Unix System Services File Space Used, Aaron Walker
• TN3270 SSL problem, Gibney, Dave
  • Re: TN3270 SSL problem, Raymond Noal
    • Re: TN3270 SSL problem, Gibney, Dave
      • Re: TN3270 SSL problem, Gibney, Dave
• Is this email formatted correctly?, Dave Salt
  • Re: Is this email formatted correctly?, Richards, Robert B.
    • Re: Is this email formatted correctly?, Richards, Robert B.
      • Re: Is this email formatted correctly?, Dave Salt
  • Re: Is this email formatted correctly?, Steve Comstock
    • Re: Is this email formatted correctly?, Thomas Berg
      • Re: Is this email formatted correctly?, Thomas Berg
  • Re: Is this email formatted correctly?, Dave Salt
  • Re: Is this email formatted correctly?, Clark Morris
  • Re: Is this email formatted correctly?, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is this email formatted correctly?, Thompson, Steve
    • Re: Is this email formatted correctly?, Steve Comstock
      • Re: Is this email formatted correctly?, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: Is this email formatted correctly?, Phil Smith III
    • Re: Is this email formatted correctly?, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: Is this email formatted correctly?, Ed Finnell
• Anthony Fletcher/New Zealand/IBM is out of the office., Anthony Fletcher
• ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) Status Update, Brian Peterson
• Which is better? question about CGI program., McKown, John
  • Re: Which is better? question about CGI program., Lindy Mayfield
  • Re: Which is better? question about CGI program., hunter . zhough
  • Re: Which is better? question about CGI program., Farley, Peter x23353
    • Re: Which is better? question about CGI program., John McKown
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Which is better? question about CGI program., John McKown
• ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) was (Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support), Mark Zelden
  • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) was (Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support), Edward Jaffe
    • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) was (Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support), Tony Harminc
      • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) was (Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support), Edward Jaffe
      • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) was (Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support), Jim Mulder
      • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) was (Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support), Tony Harminc
  • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) was (Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support), Greg Shirey
    • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) was (Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support), John Crossno
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) was (Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support), Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) was (Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support), Bob Rutledge
  • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) was (Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support), Mark Zelden
  • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) was (Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support), Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) was (Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support), Bruce Hewson
• TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Howard Rifkind
  • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, John P Kalinich
  • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Horne, Jim - James S
  • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, George Allen Bly
  • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Bonno, Tuco
    • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Flint, Mike
  • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Lindy Mayfield
    • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Steve Comstock
  • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Roger Bolan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Bri P
  • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Gary Green
    • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Howard Rifkind
      • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Hardee, Charles H
      • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, John P Kalinich
      • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Hardee, Charles H
      • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Itschak Mugzach
      • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, John P Kalinich
      • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Hardee, Charles H
  • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Tom Marchant
    • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Don Leahy
  • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Gary Green
  • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Mark Yuhas
    • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Itschak Mugzach
  • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Itschak Mugzach
  • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Itschak Mugzach
  • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Mark Yuhas
  • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Hardee, Charles H
  • Re: TSO/ISPF Screen Swap, Mark Zelden
• Free Software Downloads and Software Reviews - Download, PRIYA
• QUERY IBM-MAIN, Tim McCluskey
• Are you getting anything?, Ed Finnell
  • Re: Are you getting anything?, Steve Comstock
  • Re: Are you getting anything?, Bobbie Justice
    • Re: Are you getting anything?, Lindy Mayfield
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Are you getting anything?, Ed Finnell
  • Re: Are you getting anything?, Bruno Sugliani
  • Re: Are you getting anything?, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Are you getting anything?, Ed Finnell
• Internet IBMLink is down - apparently for a scheduled outage, Brian Peterson
  • Re: Internet IBMLink is down - apparently for a scheduled outage, Skip Robinson
    • Re: Internet IBMLink is down - apparently for a scheduled outage, Clark Morris
      • Re: Internet IBMLink is down - apparently for a scheduled outage, Bobbie Justice
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Internet IBMLink is down - apparently for a scheduled outage, Ed Finnell
• Andy Pesce is out of the office., Andy Pesce
• Tivoli Workload Scheduler using excessive CPU, Richards, Robert B.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Tivoli Workload Scheduler using excessive CPU, Richards, Robert B.
• Preventing LOGREC Recording in a Recovery Routine, David Kreiss
  • Re: Preventing LOGREC Recording in a Recovery Routine, Ray Overby
    • Re: Preventing LOGREC Recording in a Recovery Routine, David Kreiss
      • Re: Preventing LOGREC Recording in a Recovery Routine, Dave Day
      • Re: Preventing LOGREC Recording in a Recovery Routine, David Kreiss
      • Re: Preventing LOGREC Recording in a Recovery Routine, Dave Day
      • Re: Preventing LOGREC Recording in a Recovery Routine, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Preventing LOGREC Recording in a Recovery Routine, David Kreiss
      • Re: Preventing LOGREC Recording in a Recovery Routine, Jim Mulder
      • Re: Preventing LOGREC Recording in a Recovery Routine, David Kreiss
      • Re: Preventing LOGREC Recording in a Recovery Routine, David Kreiss
      • Re: Preventing LOGREC Recording in a Recovery Routine, David Kreiss
      • Re: Preventing LOGREC Recording in a Recovery Routine, Ray Overby
• Re: USS part of maintenance, Bobbie Justice
• Old 5798-DZW Dynamic STEPLIB Facility, Michael Cleary
  • Re: Old 5798-DZW Dynamic STEPLIB Facility, Knutson, Sam
    • Re: Old 5798-DZW Dynamic STEPLIB Facility, Pedro Vera
• Announcing Updates to XMITIP, FTPB, and more., Lionel B Dyck
  • Passing data within the ISPF Data Set List Filter Exit, Schwarz, Barry A
    • Re: Passing data within the ISPF Data Set List Filter Exit, Ray Overby
      • Re: Passing data within the ISPF Data Set List Filter Exit, Pedro Vera
      • Re: Passing data within the ISPF Data Set List Filter Exit, Schwarz, Barry A
• WebSphere Question, Gary Green
  • Re: WebSphere Question, Patrick Falcone
    • Re: WebSphere Question, Gary Green
  • Re: WebSphere Question, Chauhan, Jasbir
    • Re: WebSphere Question, Gary Green
  • Re: WebSphere Question, Gray, Larry - Larry A
  • Re: WebSphere Question, rpanzino
  • Re: WebSphere Question, rpanzino
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: WebSphere Question, Bryan Klimek
  • Re: WebSphere Question, Timothy Sipples
    • Re: WebSphere Question, Gary Green
• CICS Program, Andy Pesce
  • Re: CICS Program, John P Kalinich
  • Re: CICS Program, McKown, John
    • Re: CICS Program, Barkow, Eileen
• IBM's mainframe-oriented newsgroups, Patrick O'Keefe
  • Re: IBM's mainframe-oriented newsgroups, Tony Harminc
• VTS Tapes and S413 Abends, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: VTS Tapes and S413 Abends, Ken Porowski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: VTS Tapes and S413 Abends, Lizette Koehler
    • Re: VTS Tapes and S413 Abends, Ken Porowski
    • Re: VTS Tapes and S413 Abends, Richard Peurifoy
      • Re: VTS Tapes and S413 Abends, Lizette Koehler
      • Re: VTS Tapes and S413 Abends, Patrick Falcone
      • Re: VTS Tapes and S413 Abends, Lizette Koehler
      • Re: VTS Tapes and S413 Abends, Neal Eckhardt
      • Re: VTS Tapes and S413 Abends, Ken Porowski
• CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support, Dean Montevago
  • Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support, Burrell, C. Todd , CDC/OCOO/ITSO, CTR
    • Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support, Pinnacle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support, McKown, John
      • Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support, Dean Montevago
  • Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support, David Waldman
    • Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support, Donnelly, John P
      • Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support, Steven Conway
      • Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support, Dean Montevago
      • Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support, Steven Conway
  • Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support, Thomas Lawrence
  • Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support, David Waldman
    • Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support, Dean Montevago
• BMC Control-M User-Defined Variable, Laine, Rogers
  • Re: BMC Control-M User-Defined Variable, Gil
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: BMC Control-M User-Defined Variable, Scott Barry
• Management reading list (non-technical but at least slightly on topic), Steve Comstock
• z/OS contract work, P S
• how to delete a non-existence record from HSM, Tommy Tsui
  • Re: how to delete a non-existence record from HSM, Rob Scott
    • Re: how to delete a non-existence record from HSM, Tommy Tsui
      • Re: how to delete a non-existence record from HSM, Tommy Tsui
    • Re: how to delete a non-existence record from HSM, Beesley, Paul
      • Re: how to delete a non-existence record from HSM, Traylor, Terry
• CF structure management - Understanding, Cwi Jeret
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CF structure management - Understanding, Barbara Nitz
  • Re: CF structure management - Understanding, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
• Can STGINDEX have secondary allocations?, Jan Vanbrabant
  • Re: Can STGINDEX have secondary allocations?, Staller, Allan
    • Re: Can STGINDEX have secondary allocations?, Rick Fochtman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Can STGINDEX have secondary allocations?, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
    • Re: Can STGINDEX have secondary allocations?, Staller, Allan
      • USS part of maintenance, Mueller, David
  • Re: Can STGINDEX have secondary allocations?, Barbara Nitz
  • Re: Can STGINDEX have secondary allocations?, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Can STGINDEX have secondary allocations?, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
  • Re: Can STGINDEX have secondary allocations?, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Can STGINDEX have secondary allocations?, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
    • Re: Can STGINDEX have secondary allocations?, John Kington
  • Re: Can STGINDEX have secondary allocations?, Tom Marchant
  • Re: Can STGINDEX have secondary allocations?, Mark Zelden
    • Re: Can STGINDEX have secondary allocations?, John Kington
• Re: IBM using more below the line storage, Barbara Nitz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage, Peter Relson
• Steven Liston/IS/SLC/StandardLifeGroup is out of the office., Steven Liston
• Re: SFTP GET COMMAND QUESTION, Bill Godfrey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SFTP GET COMMAND QUESTION, Bill Godfrey
• IBM using more below the line storage., John Mattson
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Bob Rutledge
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Knutson, Sam
    • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Jakubek, Jan
    • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Edward Jaffe
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Clark Morris
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., John Eells
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Pinnacle
    • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Wayne Driscoll
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Roland Schiradin
    • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., George Rodriguez
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Roland Schiradin
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., , IBM Mainframe Discussion List
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Doug Henry
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Kelman, Tom
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Scott Rowe
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Scott Rowe
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Tom Marchant
    • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Edward Jaffe
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: IBM using more below the line storage., Ted MacNEIL
• Related to: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Tom Ross
• Listing of current ROOT with Mount Points, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: Listing of current ROOT with Mount Points, George Allen Bly
  • Re: Listing of current ROOT with Mount Points, McKown, John
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Listing of current ROOT with Mount Points, Scott Barry
  • Re: Listing of current ROOT with Mount Points, Lizette Koehler
    • Re: Listing of current ROOT with Mount Points, McKown, John
• Re: South Dakota migrates off mainframe; chaos ensues, McKown, John
  • Re: South Dakota migrates off mainframe; chaos ensues, Pommier, Rex R.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: South Dakota migrates off mainframe; chaos ensues, Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: South Dakota migrates off mainframe; chaos ensues, Pommier, Rex R.
      • Re: South Dakota migrates off mainframe; chaos ensues, McKown, John
  • Re: South Dakota migrates off mainframe; chaos ensues, Ed Finnell
  • Re: South Dakota migrates off mainframe; chaos ensues, Matthew Stitt
• Sort Trivia - or What Were You Thinking?, Martin Kline
  • Re: Sort Trivia - or What Were You Thinking?, Ulrich Krueger
  • Re: Sort Trivia - or What Were You Thinking?, William H. Blair
• User/Ref Manual for CSS, Shaja
  • Re: User/Ref Manual for CSS, Schwarz, Barry A
  • Re: User/Ref Manual for CSS, Greg Shirey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: User/Ref Manual for CSS, Shaja Radhangan
    • Re: User/Ref Manual for CSS, Greg Shirey
• WLM and skip clock, Max Scarpa
  • Re: WLM and skip clock, Gerhard Adam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: WLM and skip clock, Mark Zelden
    • Re: WLM and skip clock, Gerhard Adam
  • Re: WLM and skip clock, Max Scarpa
  • Re: WLM and skip clock, Max Scarpa
• wildcard utilities, SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Jim
  • Re: wildcard utilities, John Kington
  • Re: wildcard utilities, Jack Kelly
  • Re: wildcard utilities, Hal Merritt
  • Re: wildcard utilities, Ulrich Krueger
  • Re: wildcard utilities, McKown, John
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: wildcard utilities, SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Jim
    • Re: wildcard utilities, Tony B.
    • Re: wildcard utilities, Stephen Mednick
  • Re: wildcard utilities, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: wildcard utilities, SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Jim
    • Re: wildcard utilities, Schwarz, Barry A
  • Re: wildcard utilities, SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Jim
  • Re: wildcard utilities, SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Jim
    • Re: wildcard utilities, Farley, Peter x23353
  • Re: wildcard utilities, SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Jim
  • Re: wildcard utilities, SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Jim
    • Re: wildcard utilities, Lizette Koehler
    • Re: wildcard utilities, Wolfgang Schäfer
  • Re: wildcard utilities, Terry Sambrooks
  • Re: wildcard utilities, SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Jim
    • Re: wildcard utilities, McKown, John
• LOOKAT ICH408I, Paul GilmartinIBM-MAIN@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: LOOKAT ICH408I, Rabbe, Luke
    • Re: LOOKAT ICH408I, Jerry Fuchs
  • Re: LOOKAT ICH408I, Maarten Slegtenhorst
  • Re: LOOKAT ICH408I, McKown, John
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: LOOKAT ICH408I, Mark Zelden
    • Re: LOOKAT ICH408I, Hal Merritt
  • Re: LOOKAT ICH408I, Patrick O'Keefe
  • Re: LOOKAT ICH408I, Walt Farrell
• JES2 Add Exit Dynamically, Gilson OLIVEIRA
  • Re: JES2 Add Exit Dynamically, Mark Jacobs
• CA-View, Gerry Anstey
  • Re: CA-View, Beesley, Paul
    • Re: CA-View, Gerry Anstey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CA-View, Mark Zelden
    • Re: CA-View, Gerry Anstey
      • Re: CA-View, Jousma, David
      • Re: CA-View, Beesley, Paul
  • Re: CA-View, Mark Zelden
• STARTIO macro doc, Lindy Mayfield
  • Re: STARTIO macro doc, Hal Merritt
    • Re: STARTIO macro doc, Lindy Mayfield
      • Re: STARTIO macro doc, Blaicher, Chris
      • Re: STARTIO macro doc, Raymond Noal
      • Re: STARTIO macro doc, Hal Merritt
      • Re: STARTIO macro doc, Lindy Mayfield
      • Re: STARTIO macro doc, Rick Fochtman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: STARTIO macro doc, , IBM Mainframe Discussion List
    • Re: STARTIO macro doc, Lindy Mayfield
• Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 - "3278T" setting, Patrick O'Keefe
• How to change the ISPF code page?, Lindy Mayfield
  • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Edward Jaffe
    • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Lindy Mayfield
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Lizette Koehler
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Lindy Mayfield
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Lindy Mayfield
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Lindy Mayfield
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Ed Finnell
  • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Lizette Koehler
    • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Bonno, Tuco
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Lindy Mayfield
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Dave Salt
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Lindy Mayfield
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, McKown, John
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Lindy Mayfield
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Lindy Mayfield
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Dave Salt
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Lindy Mayfield
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, McKown, John
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Gerhard Postpischil
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, John McKown
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Gerhard Postpischil
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Dave Salt
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Lindy Mayfield
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Dave Salt
  • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Edward Jaffe
    • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Gerhard Postpischil
      • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
    • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
  • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Ed Finnell
  • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Edward Jaffe
  • Re: How to change the ISPF code page?, Patrick O'Keefe
• How long to install a ServerPac, Neal Eckhardt
  • Re: How long to install a ServerPac, Staller, Allan
  • Re: How long to install a ServerPac, Gibney, Dave
  • Re: How long to install a ServerPac, Rick Fochtman
    • Re: How long to install a ServerPac, Neal Eckhardt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How long to install a ServerPac, Brian Westerman
    • Re: How long to install a ServerPac, Shane
• Using SETXCF START,MSGBASED exploit MSGBASED processing for CFRM?, Knutson, Sam
  • Re: Using SETXCF START,MSGBASED exploit MSGBASED processing for CFRM?, Norman Hollander on h-WiZ.biz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Using SETXCF START,MSGBASED exploit MSGBASED processing for CFRM?, Doug Henry
• Jason Gately is on Annual Leave, Jason Gately
• CA-MIM/Integrity abend., McKown, John
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Jakubek, Jan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., McKown, John
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Rob Scott
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., McKown, John
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Veilleux, Jon L
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Bobbie Justice
      • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., McKown, John
      • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Clark Morris
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Veilleux, Jon L
      • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Bobbie Justice
      • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Rick Fochtman
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., McKown, John
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Veilleux, Jon L
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., McKown, John
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., McKown, John
      • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Knutson, Sam
      • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., McKown, John
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Mark Zelden
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Veilleux, Jon L
      • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., McKown, John
      • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Eric Bielefeld
      • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Neal Eckhardt
      • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., McKown, John
      • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Veilleux, Jon L
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Mark Zelden
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Mark Zelden
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Mark Zelden
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., McKown, John
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Tom Marchant
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., McKown, John
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Mark Zelden
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., McKown, John
      • Message not available
      • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., McKown, John
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Bobbie Justice
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Greg Shirey
      • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., McKown, John
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Tom Marchant
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Eric Bielefeld
    • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Rick Fochtman
  • Re: CA-MIM/Integrity abend., Ted MacNEIL
• Fw: (Duplicate Post) Use count for LPA modules, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Fw: (Duplicate Post) Use count for LPA modules, John Blythe Reid
• Use count for LPA modules, John Reid
  • Re: Use count for LPA modules, Rob Scott
    • Re: Use count for LPA modules, John Blythe Reid
• PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Pinnacle
  • Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Jerry Durbin
  • Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Edward Jaffe
  • Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Dave Salt
  • Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Roger Bolan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Thomas Kern
  • Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Gary Green
  • Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Bruno Sugliani
  • Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Barbara Nitz
    • Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), J R
      • Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Roger Bolan
    • Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Roger Bolan
  • SV: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Thomas Berg
    • Re: SV: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Roger Bolan
      • Re: SV: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Don Leahy
    • Re: SV: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Roger Bolan
  • SV: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Thomas Berg
  • Re: SV: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Lizette Koehler
  • SV: SV: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Thomas Berg
  • Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), David Alcock
    • Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Don Leahy
    • Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Edward Jaffe
      • Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), McKown, John
      • Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant), Roger Bolan
• (none), John Blythe Reid
  • SFTP GET COMMAND QUESTION, Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM
    • Re: SFTP GET COMMAND QUESTION, McKown, John
      • Re: SFTP GET COMMAND QUESTION, Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM
      • Re: SFTP GET COMMAND QUESTION, Richard Peurifoy
      • Re: SFTP GET COMMAND QUESTION, Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM
      • Re: SFTP GET COMMAND QUESTION, McKown, John
    • Re: SFTP GET COMMAND QUESTION, Hal Merritt
      • Re: SFTP GET COMMAND QUESTION, Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM
      • Re: SFTP GET COMMAND QUESTION, McKown, John
• LPA module use count, John Blythe Reid
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • LPA module use count, John Blythe Reid
• SSHTectia Server for z/OS, Betsy Jeffery
• Sharing catalog among systems,benefits or trouble?, Victor Zhang
  • Re: Sharing catalog among systems,benefits or trouble?, Knutson, Sam
  • Re: Sharing catalog among systems,benefits or trouble?, Hal Merritt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sharing catalog among systems,benefits or trouble?, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Sharing catalog among systems,benefits or trouble?, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Sharing catalog among systems,benefits or trouble?, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Sharing catalog among systems,benefits or trouble?, Tom Marchant
  • Re: Sharing catalog among systems,benefits or trouble?, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Sharing catalog among systems,benefits or trouble?, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
  • Re: Sharing catalog among systems,benefits or trouble?, Arthur Gutowski
  • Re: Sharing catalog among systems,benefits or trouble?, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Sharing catalog among systems,benefits or trouble?, Arthur Gutowski
• Going unsupported - time to fold?, Peggy Andrews
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Staller, Allan
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Shane
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, David Andrews
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Hal Merritt
    • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Staller, Allan
      • SV: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Thomas Berg
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Staller, Allan
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Rick Fochtman
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Mark Jacobs
    • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Chris Hoelscher
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Gerhard Adam
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Jon Brock
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Hal Merritt
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Gerhard Adam
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Hal Merritt
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Patrick Falcone
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Rick Fochtman
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Rick Fochtman
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Gerhard Adam
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Hal Merritt
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Peggy Andrews
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Hal Merritt
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Clark Morris
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Mark Jacobs
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Skip Robinson
    • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, McKown, John
    • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Skip Robinson
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, pauls2272
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Len Rugen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Peggy Andrews
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Thompson, Steve
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Thompson, Steve
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Arthur T.
  • Going unsupported - time to fold?, Tom
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Timothy Sipples
    • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Eric Bielefeld
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Richards, Robert B.
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Ed Finnell
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Scott Fagen
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Thompson, Steve
    • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, McKown, John
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, McKown, John
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Clark Morris
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Alan Altmark
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Timothy Sipples
    • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, David Andrews
      • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Hal Merritt
  • Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?, Timothy Sipples
• Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Larre Shiller
  • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Edward Jaffe
    • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
      • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), McKown, John
      • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
      • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
      • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
    • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Wayne Driscoll
      • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Roger Bolan
      • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Roger Bolan
      • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Mark Zelden
    • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Mansell, George R.
  • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Larre Shiller
  • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Mark Zelden
    • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Mansell, George R.
  • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Larre Shiller
    • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 - "3278T" setting, David Cole
      • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 - "3278T" setting, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 - "3278T" setting, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: SV: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Edward Jaffe
  • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Mark Zelden
  • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Ed Finnell
  • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Mark Zelden
  • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Ed Finnell
  • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Patrick O'Keefe
• Fw: [IBM-MAIN] RSU 0806?, Andy White
  • Re: Fw: [IBM-MAIN] RSU 0806?, Tom
• z/OS 1.10 toleration PTFs, ELPANCOAST
• OMEGAMON/DB2, Jim Chappell
• Multi-term, Carroll, William
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Multi-term, Ed Finnell
• Re: Strange Problem: System Code S106, Edward Jaffe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Strange Problem: System Code S106, Peter Relson
• SMF record 74 subtype 1, Natasa Savinc
  • Re: SMF record 74 subtype 1, Yifat Oren
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SMF record 74 subtype 1, Mark Zelden
  • Re: SMF record 74 subtype 1, Natasa Savinc
• What is AKPCSIEP?, McKown, John
  • Re: What is AKPCSIEP?, Stone, Sandy
  • Re: What is AKPCSIEP?, Steven Conway
  • Re: What is AKPCSIEP?, dmulliga
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is AKPCSIEP?, Ed Finnell
  • Re: What is AKPCSIEP?, Big Iron
    • Re: What is AKPCSIEP?, Roger Bolan
• RSU 0806?, Andy White
  • Re: RSU 0806?, Lizette Koehler
    • Re: RSU 0806?, Andy White
      • Re: RSU 0806?, ELPANCOAST
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: RSU 0806?, Mark Zelden
  • Re: RSU 0806?, Brian Peterson
    • Re: RSU 0806?, Andy White
  • Re: RSU 0806?, Mark Zelden
    • Re: RSU 0806?, ELPANCOAST
  • Re: RSU 0806?, Doug Henry
  • Re: RSU 0806?, David Magee
• coming soon in my product., Shai Hess
  • Re: coming soon in my product., Lindy Mayfield
    • Re: coming soon in my product., shai hess
      • Re: coming soon in my product., Lindy Mayfield
      • Re: coming soon in my product., shai hess
      • Re: coming soon in my product., Lindy Mayfield
      • Re: coming soon in my product., Dave Salt
      • Re: coming soon in my product., Edward Jaffe
      • Re: coming soon in my product., Lindy Mayfield
      • Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 - Green card confusion, David Cole
      • Re: coming soon in my product., Ed Philbrook
      • Re: coming soon in my product., Dave Salt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: coming soon in my product., Mark Zelden
    • Re: coming soon in my product., Steve Comstock
      • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Steve Comstock
    • Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 (Was: coming soon ...), Edward Jaffe
  • Re: coming soon in my product., Mark Zelden
    • Re: coming soon in my product., Steve Comstock
• Racf Report of CICS User's, Gaur
• Return the base of the racf., HELIO
  • Re: Return the base of the racf., R.S.
  • Re: Return the base of the racf., Rick Fochtman
    • Re: Return the base of the racf., Ivan Warren
  • Re: Return the base of the racf., Knutson, Sam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Return the base of the racf., Ed Finnell
    • Re: Return the base of the racf., R.S.
  • Re: Return the base of the racf., Mark Zelden
• Memory Upgradation ??, Jacky Bright
  • Re: Memory Upgradation ??, Rick Fochtman
  • Re: Memory Upgradation ??, Shane Ginnane
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Memory Upgradation ??, Ed Finnell
    • Re: Memory Upgradation ??, Martin Packer
  • Re: Memory Upgradation ??, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: Memory Upgradation ??, Gibney, Dave
• Sysplex CDS placement, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
  • Re: Sysplex CDS placement, R.S.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sysplex CDS placement, Barbara Nitz
  • Re: Sysplex CDS placement, Freddy Guevara
  • Re: Sysplex CDS placement, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
• OPENING FOR COBOL WITH C IN CHENNAI, jobs . scillatec
• Re: Chargeback reporting, Ted MacNEIL
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Chargeback reporting, Scott Barry
  • Re: Chargeback reporting, Ted MacNEIL
• Re: Edit macro to support jcl set commands in instream inputs, Kenneth E Tomiak
  • Re: Edit macro to support jcl set commands in instream inputs, Itschak Mugzach
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Edit macro to support jcl set commands in instream inputs, Kenneth E Tomiak
    • Re: Edit macro to support jcl set commands in instream inputs, Itschak Mugzach
• Phillips, Mike is out of the office., Mike Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Phillips, Mike is out of the office., Mike Phillips
  • Phillips, Mike is out of the office., Mike Phillips
• DB2 V8 and Unicode, Hal Merritt
  • Re: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Chase, John
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Brian Peterson
  • Re: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Mark Zelden
    • Re: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Chase, John
  • Re: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Lizette Koehler
    • Re: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Hal Merritt
  • Re: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Mark Zelden
  • Re: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Mark Zelden
    • Re: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Hal Merritt
  • Re: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Brian Peterson
  • Re: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Mark Zelden
  • Re: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Brian Peterson
  • Re: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Mark Zelden
  • Re: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Mark Zelden
    • Related to: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Steve Comstock
  • Re: DB2 V8 and Unicode, Kenneth E Tomiak
• Command OGETX not found (!?), Chase, John
  • Re: Command OGETX not found (!?), Hal Merritt
  • Re: Command OGETX not found (!?), McKown, John
    • Re: Command OGETX not found (!?), Chase, John
  • Re: Command OGETX not found (!?), Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Command OGETX not found (!?), Elardus Engelbrecht
    • Re: Command OGETX not found (!?), Chase, John
  • Re: Command OGETX not found (!?), Elardus Engelbrecht
    • Re: Command OGETX not found (!?), Pat Mihalec
• DFHSM - turn off migration in ARCCMDnn?, McKown, John
  • Re: DFHSM - turn off migration in ARCCMDnn?, O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT
  • Re: DFHSM - turn off migration in ARCCMDnn?, Gil
• cut/paste from HMC, Miklos Szigetvari
  • Re: cut/paste from HMC, Jack Kelly
    • Re: cut/paste from HMC, Miklos Szigetvari
  • Re: cut/paste from HMC, Martin Packer
• Setting Coupling Facility VOLATILE: NO, Knutson, Sam
  • Re: Setting Coupling Facility VOLATILE: NO, Lizette Koehler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Setting Coupling Facility VOLATILE: NO, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
    • Re: Setting Coupling Facility VOLATILE: NO, Skip Robinson
  • Re: Setting Coupling Facility VOLATILE: NO, Barbara Nitz
• CEA - Common Event Adapter, Dean Montevago
  • Re: CEA - Common Event Adapter, Chase, John
  • Re: CEA - Common Event Adapter, Bob Shannon
    • Re: CEA - Common Event Adapter, Dean Montevago
    • Re: CEA - Common Event Adapter, Hal Merritt
      • Re: CEA - Common Event Adapter, Dean Montevago
    • Re: CEA - Common Event Adapter, Wayne Driscoll
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CEA - Common Event Adapter, Elardus Engelbrecht
  • Re: CEA - Common Event Adapter, Scott Fagen
    • Re: CEA - Common Event Adapter, Dean Montevago
  • Re: CEA - Common Event Adapter, Patrick O'Keefe
  • Re: CEA - Common Event Adapter, Barbara Nitz
  • Re: CEA - Common Event Adapter, Ed Finnell
• Mainframe vulnerabilities, Lizette Koehler
• AUTO: James Obrizok is out of the office (returning 07/07/2008), James Obrizok
• want to read a dataset in use, Al Chu
  • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Binyamin Dissen
  • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Craddock, Chris
  • Re: want to read a dataset in use, al chu
    • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Skip Robinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
  • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
    • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Jack Kelly
      • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Steve Comstock
      • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Steve Comstock
  • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Paul Gilmartin
  • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Paul Gilmartin
  • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Paul Gilmartin
  • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Walt Farrell
    • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Jack Kelly
  • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Lizette Koehler
    • Re: want to read a dataset in use, J R
      • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Howard Brazee
  • Re: want to read a dataset in use, , IBM Mainframe Discussion List
  • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Paul Gilmartin
  • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: want to read a dataset in use, J R
  • Re: want to read a dataset in use, Paul Gilmartin
• Refreshing LLA modules in batch mode, CAPRON Romain
  • Re: Refreshing LLA modules in batch mode, z/OS scheduler
    • Re: Refreshing LLA modules in batch mode, Itschak Mugzach
      • Re: Refreshing LLA modules in batch mode, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: Refreshing LLA modules in batch mode, Jakubek, Jan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Refreshing LLA modules in batch mode, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
    • Re: Refreshing LLA modules in batch mode, Wayne Driscoll
• Z/OS IBM Mainframe Computer Time To Rent., Shai Hess
  • Re: Z/OS IBM Mainframe Computer Time To Rent., Itschak Mugzach
    • Re: Z/OS IBM Mainframe Computer Time To Rent., Jim McAlpine
  • Re: Z/OS IBM Mainframe Computer Time To Rent., Tony Harminc
    • Re: Z/OS IBM Mainframe Computer Time To Rent., Chase, John
      • Re: Z/OS IBM Mainframe Computer Time To Rent., Tony Harminc
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Z/OS IBM Mainframe Computer Time To Rent., Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
  • Re: Z/OS IBM Mainframe Computer Time To Rent., J D Cassidy
• Check out Redmond Channel Partner Online | News: Citibank Hack Shines Light o, Ed Finnell
• Patrick R Kirby is out of the office., Patrick R Kirby/SCO
• Mounting Enterprise PL/I HFS, Ian S. Worthington
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mounting Enterprise PL/I HFS, Big Iron
  • Re: Mounting Enterprise PL/I HFS, Ian S. Worthington
  • Re: Mounting Enterprise PL/I HFS, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Mounting Enterprise PL/I HFS, Ian S. Worthington
  • Re: Mounting Enterprise PL/I HFS, Big Iron
  • Re: Mounting Enterprise PL/I HFS, Big Iron
  • Re: Mounting Enterprise PL/I HFS, Ian S. Worthington
• Cataloging problem, Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM
  • Re: Cataloging problem, Mueller, David
  • Re: Cataloging problem, Pedro Vera
  • Re: Cataloging problem, John Sullivan
    • Re: Cataloging problem, Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM
      • Re: Cataloging problem, Schwarz, Barry A
      • Re: Cataloging problem, Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM
    • Re: Cataloging problem, Schwarz, Barry A
  • Re: Cataloging problem, Knutson, Sam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Cataloging problem, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: Cataloging problem, Pedro Vera
      • Re: Cataloging problem, Lizette Koehler
    • Re: Cataloging problem, Schwarz, Barry A
  • Re: Cataloging problem, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: Cataloging problem, Chase, John
      • Re: Cataloging problem, Schwarz, Barry A
      • Re: Cataloging problem, Chase, John
      • Re: Cataloging problem, Schwarz, Barry A
      • Re: Cataloging problem, Rick Fochtman
  • Re: Cataloging problem, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Cataloging problem, Ted MacNEIL
• IBM buys PSI, Dave Jones
  • Re: IBM buys PSI, Steve Samson
  • Re: IBM buys PSI, Farley, Peter x23353
  • Re: IBM buys PSI, Gibney, Dave
    • Re: IBM buys PSI, McKown, John
  • Re: IBM buys PSI, Pinnacle
    • Re: [spam] Re: IBM buys PSI, R.S.
      • Re: [spam] Re: IBM buys PSI, Jim McAlpine
      • Re: [spam] Re: IBM buys PSI, R.S.
  • Re: IBM buys PSI, z/OS scheduler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IBM buys PSI, Bruno Sugliani
  • Re: IBM buys PSI, Mohammad Khan
  • Re: IBM buys PSI, Anton Britz
  • Re: IBM buys PSI, Mark Zelden
    • Re: IBM buys PSI, Daniel Mouly
  • Re: IBM buys PSI, Anton Britz
    • Re: IBM buys PSI, Bob Shannon
  • Re: IBM buys PSI, Timothy Sipples
    • Re: IBM buys PSI, Steve Comstock
  • Re: IBM buys PSI, Bruno Sugliani
  • Re: IBM buys PSI, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: IBM buys PSI, Wayne Driscoll
    • Re: IBM buys PSI, Steve Comstock
  • Re: IBM buys PSI, Thompson, Steve
  • Re: IBM buys PSI, Patrick O'Keefe
• sensitivity and sensibility, john gilmore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: sensitivity and sensibility, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: sensitivity and sensibility, Patrick O'Keefe
• IDCAMS Doc, Lindy Mayfield
  • Re: IDCAMS Doc, Mark Jacobs
  • Re: IDCAMS Doc, Joel C. Ewing
• Internet Explorer and z/OS FTP, Neal Eckhardt
• Display IEAOPT, Lizette Koehler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Display IEAOPT, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Display IEAOPT, Lizette Koehler
    • Re: Display IEAOPT, Joseph H Winterton
      • Re: Display IEAOPT, Jim Chappell
      • Re: Display IEAOPT, Dave Barry
  • Re: Display IEAOPT, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Display IEAOPT, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Display IEAOPT, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Display IEAOPT, Lizette Koehler
    • Re: Display IEAOPT, Lindy Mayfield
  • Re: Display IEAOPT, Martin Packer
  • Re: Display IEAOPT, Elardus Engelbrecht
  • Re: Display IEAOPT, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Display IEAOPT, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: Display IEAOPT, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Display IEAOPT, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Display IEAOPT, Don Deese
  • Re: Display IEAOPT, Norman Hollander
• SMF 119, Rafal Hanzel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SMF 119, Chris Mason
    • Re: SMF 119, Rafal Hanzel
• Re: Enhanced JCL processor? (and maybe a few other thoughts), William H. Blair
  • Re: Enhanced JCL processor? (and maybe a few other thoughts), Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
    • Re: Enhanced JCL processor? (and maybe a few other thoughts), William H. Blair
      • Re: Enhanced JCL processor? (and maybe a few other thoughts), Howard Brazee
    • Re: Enhanced JCL processor? (and maybe a few other thoughts), Rick Fochtman
• ISPF CLIST case nonsensibility, Paul GilmartinIBM-MAIN@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ISPF CLIST case nonsensibility, Mark Zelden
  • Re: ISPF CLIST case nonsensibility, Elardus Engelbrecht
• Re: [OT] - X.25 PAD ? (was: TN3270 *from* a host??), Chris Mason
• Yahoo - Group for mainframe People - MFRESOURCE, Sri
• IBMLink, Thompson, Steve
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • IBMLINK, Dean Montevago
  • Re: IBMLINK, Barbara Nitz
    • Re: IBMLINK, Dean Montevago
  • Re: IBMLINK, Thompson, Steve
  • IBMLINK, Dean Montevago
    • Re: IBMLINK, Bobbie Justice
  • Re: IBMLINK, Barbara Nitz
• Re: Another difference between platforms..., Arthur Gutowski
  • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Chase, John
    • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Shane Ginnane
      • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Chase, John
      • Edit macro to support jcl set commands in instream inputs, Itschak Mugzach
      • Re: Edit macro to support jcl set commands in instream inputs, Dave Salt
      • Re: Edit macro to support jcl set commands in instream inputs, Itschak Mugzach
  • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Rick Fochtman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Clark Morris
    • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Howard Brazee
    • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Rick Fochtman
      • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Chase, John
      • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Veilleux, Jon L
      • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Gerhard Postpischil
      • Re: Another difference between platforms..., John P. Baker
  • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Thompson, Steve
    • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Graeme Gibson
    • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
      • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Eric Bielefeld
      • Re: Another difference between platforms..., William H. Blair
  • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Tom Marchant
    • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Clark Morris
      • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Wayne Driscoll
      • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Clark Morris
      • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
      • Re: Another difference between platforms..., robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Another difference between platforms..., John P. Baker
  • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Thompson, Steve
    • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Tony B.
    • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Rick Fochtman
  • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Alan Altmark
    • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Anne & Lynn Wheeler
    • Re: Another difference between platforms..., John P. Baker
  • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Rick Fochtman
      • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Rick Fochtman
  • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Paul Gilmartin
  • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Alan Altmark
  • Re: Another difference between platforms..., Alan Altmark
• Re: USS file sharing in z/OS, Arthur Gutowski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: USS file sharing in z/OS, Mark Zelden
    • Re: USS file sharing in z/OS, Rob Schramm
• Re: SMS construct pgm name, John Kington
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SMS construct pgm name, McKown, John
  • Re: SMS construct pgm name, Rabbe, Luke
    • Re: SMS construct pgm name, Jack Kelly
• Re: Antwort: Thoughts/Experience with migration from Serana Changeman to SCLM, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
• Alan Brown is out of the office., Alan Brown
• if someone remember: low core refrence, Miklos Szigetvari
  • Re: if someone remember: low core refrence, Miklos Szigetvari
  • Re: if someone remember: low core refrence, Rick Fochtman
  • Re: if someone remember: low core refrence, Pedro Vera
    • Re: if someone remember: low core refrence, Gerhard Postpischil
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • if someone remember: low core refrence, George Kozakos
    • Re: if someone remember: low core refrence, Miklos Szigetvari
  • Re: if someone remember: low core refrence, Peter Relson
• Re: We are what we are ..., Ed Finnell
  • Re: We are what we are ..., Chase, John
    • Re: We are what we are ..., Rick Fochtman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: We are what we are ..., Ed Finnell
• Re: TN3270 *from* a host??, Chris Mason
  • [OT] - X.25 PAD ? (was: TN3270 *from* a host??), Ivan Warren
• Re: what newsgroup server do you use?, tlongfellow
• Re: David Caminer (1915-2008), William Donzelli
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: David Caminer (1915-2008), William Donzelli
  • Re: David Caminer (1915-2008), Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: David Caminer (1915-2008), William Donzelli
  • Re: David Caminer (1915-2008), Gerhard Postpischil
  • Re: David Caminer (1915-2008), Andy Wood
  • Re: David Caminer (1915-2008), Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
    • Re: David Caminer (1915-2008), Rick Fochtman
  • Re: David Caminer (1915-2008), Kenny Fogarty
• Re: Utilization of Mainframe Software Licenses, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Utilization of Mainframe Software Licenses, Tom Moulder
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Utilization of Mainframe Software Licenses, Timothy Sipples
  • Re: Utilization of Mainframe Software Licenses, Timothy Sipples
• Re: z/OS 1.9 RACFDRV job converted to Top Secret, Jim
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 RACFDRV job converted to Top Secret, John Eells
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 RACFDRV job converted to Top Secret, Tony B.
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 RACFDRV job converted to Top Secret, Big Iron
  • Re: z/OS 1.9 RACFDRV job converted to Top Secret, Big Iron