Re: Is this RNL correct?
- From: mark.zelden@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Mark Zelden)
- Date: 30 Jun 2008 06:57:24 -0700
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:49:34 -0500, McKown, John
<John.Mckown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We had some DFHSM problems over the weekend (deadly embrace) on our
basic sysplex. Looking at the output of some commands that I have
automation issue, I found what I think may be a problem with an RNL
entry:
RNLDEF RNL(EXCL) TYPE(GENERIC) QNAME(SYSZVVDS)
Should this be removed or changed to:
RNLDEF RNL(CON) TYPE(GENERIC) QNAME(SYSZVVDS)
It depends. What are you doing with SYSVTOC? If you convert one,
you must convert both. FYI... I don't convert either, but I am not
using GRS STAR nor MIM in a CF. Plenty in the archives about this...
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:mark.zelden@xxxxxxxxxxxx
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
- Prev by Date: Re: JCL SET command and instream SYSIn
- Next by Date: Re: Is this RNL correct?
- Previous by thread: Is this RNL correct?
- Next by thread: Re: Is this RNL correct?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
