Re: about IEWL parameters or so
- From: shmuel+ibm-main@xxxxxxxxxxx (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.)
- Date: 30 May 2008 15:09:12 -0700
In <LISTSERV%200805230552163839.015B@xxxxxxxxxxx>, on 05/23/2008
at 05:52 AM, K Zafirop <kzafiropoulos@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
In IEWL link-edit proceduresITYM bind procedures.
PARM='XREF,LIST,AMODE(31),RMODE(ANY),CALL,MAP,LET'.
Note the LET.
I think that the member should not be replaced in such a case.
Then don't specify LET.
Is there any parameter in order to prevent the
replacement of a member in load library after an unsuccessful link-edit?
You specified a parameter to cause it to replace a member that it
otherwise would not have replaced. Get rid of the LET and it will do what
you want.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
- References:
- about IEWL parameters or so
- From: K Zafirop
- about IEWL parameters or so
- Prev by Date: Re: Can ISRDDN show the complete minor name of an ENQ'd resource?
- Next by Date: Re: 80-Column Minds (Was: SMP/E question)
- Previous by thread: Re: about IEWL parameters or so
- Next by thread: Re: about IEWL parameters or so
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
