Re: about IEWL parameters or so
- From: herman.stocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Stocker, Herman)
- Date: 23 May 2008 04:13:07 -0700
Hi K,
Look into the "LET" option.
IFRC LET allows the RC=8 to replace the member. NOLET will allow a RC=4 and
LET can be set to other values.
Regards,
Herman Stocker
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of K Zafirop
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 6:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: about IEWL parameters or so
Hi dear all,
In IEWL link-edit procedures we have specified for parameters
PARM='XREF,LIST,AMODE(31),RMODE(ANY),CALL,MAP,LET'. When we have an
RC=8 we have noticed that in 'SAVE OPERATION SUMMMARY' part of LKED sysprint
the DISPOSITION REPLACED. I think that the member should not be replaced in
such a case. Is there any parameter in order to prevent the replacement of a
member in load library after an unsuccessful link-edit?
Greetings,
K. Zafiropoulos
z/Series support engineer
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the
archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments were free of any
virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious code when sent. This message and
its attachments could have been infected during transmission. By reading the
message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full
responsibility for taking protective and remedial action about viruses and
other defects. The sender's employer is not liable for any loss or damage
arising in any way from this message or its attachments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: about IEWL parameters or so
- From: Binyamin Dissen
- Re: about IEWL parameters or so
- Prev by Date: Re: about IEWL parameters or so
- Next by Date: Re: Controlling the execution sequence of dependant jobs in JES2
- Previous by thread: Re: about IEWL parameters or so
- Next by thread: Re: about IEWL parameters or so
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|