LDMF vs. FDRMOVE (was: Shark to EMC)
- From: pinncons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Pinnacle)
- Date: 30 Jan 2008 10:07:42 -0800
Everyone else has answered well what can be used to move the data from one
place to another. The only thing I would add to that list is LDMF should
you desire a change between disk models during the conversion. FDRPAS and
TDMF will not move at the data set level to fully use larger model disks
with data sets from many smaller volumes. LDMF will do this without an
outage to the owning application. FDRMOVE is similar to LDMF in function
not in the method of delivering the function and does require an outage to
accomplish the move.
Since when does LDMF not require an outage to the owning application? There is no HIPERSWAP at the dataset level, so both LDMF and FDRMOVE may require an outage if the dataset is continuously enqueued. Let me know if I missed something about LDMF.
Regards,
Tom Conley
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LDMF vs. FDRMOVE (was: Shark to EMC)
- From: Tom Moulder
- Re: LDMF vs. FDRMOVE (was: Shark to EMC)
- References:
- Re: Shark to EMC
- From: Ted MacNEIL
- Re: Shark to EMC
- From: Tom Moulder
- Re: Shark to EMC
- Prev by Date: Re: SPAM: How to suppress some informational VTAM messages ?
- Next by Date: Re: SPAM: How to suppress some informational VTAM messages ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Shark to EMC
- Next by thread: Re: LDMF vs. FDRMOVE (was: Shark to EMC)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
