bit.listserv.ibm-main

• Date Index

---

• PL/1 Storage Control Issue, Rick Fochtman
  • Re: PL/1 Storage Control Issue, Pinnacle
  • Re: PL/1 Storage Control Issue, Ulrich Krueger
• If you are on F1/ OPT /H1/H4/L1/L2 and are looking for a promising and secure career with our company to file your H1B, Softpath Solutions is the one you can trust., aditya
• How to get CALL-Stack?, Michael Knigge
• Announcing update to CAVXTRT (user friend CA-View ISPF Interface), Lionel B Dyck
• Re: Open Source Security Risks (was T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly), Tom Marchant
• Position Posting Cincinnati, OH, USA, Jousma, David
• Re: Disassembler, new tool available, Arthur Fichtl
• z9 Management API's for JAVA, Steve Talbot-Walsh
• Re: Code pages, Alan Altmark
  • Re: Code pages, Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
• MVS Command Authorization, Phillips, Peter
  • Re: MVS Command Authorization, Edward Jaffe
    • Re: MVS Command Authorization, Gregory, Gary G
      • Re: MVS Command Authorization, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: MVS Command Authorization, Gregory, Gary G
• Reel tapes, gah
• IBMLink comes through again, Pinnacle
• Contacted for an SMP/E person, Steve Thompson
• REGION=0M and LSQA, Kenneth J. Kripke
  • Re: REGION=0M and LSQA, Johnny Luo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: REGION=0M and LSQA, Steve Thompson
  • Re: REGION=0M and LSQA, Peter Relson
    • IEFUSI and 64 Bit - was "REGION=0M and LSQA", Martin Packer
      • Re: IEFUSI and 64 Bit - was "REGION=0M and LSQA", Veilleux, Jon L
• EC/MCL and PTFs, Mike Myers
• Reel to Reel 6250 BPI, Edward Jaffe
  • Re: Reel to Reel 6250 BPI, Jeffrey Deaver
• Delay in SDSF while reading the HOLD queue, tulliofontana@xxxxxxxxx
• Jeff Foxworthy & IBM, Warner Mach
  • Re: Jeff Foxworthy & IBM, Anonymous
  • Re: Jeff Foxworthy & IBM, Chase, John
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Jeff Foxworthy & IBM, Ed Finnell
    • Re: Jeff Foxworthy & IBM, Martin Packer
  • Re: Jeff Foxworthy & IBM, Roger Bowler
• OA21346 for JES2 Dynamic Exit support - status??, Tom Schmidt
  • Re: OA21346 for JES2 Dynamic Exit support - status??, Bob Shannon
• ALIAS COUNT, esmie moo
  • Re: ALIAS COUNT, McKown, John
    • Re: ALIAS COUNT, esmie moo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ALIAS COUNT, Ed Finnell
  • Re: ALIAS COUNT, Patrick Lyon
    • Re: ALIAS COUNT, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: ALIAS COUNT, Mark Zelden
    • Re: ALIAS COUNT, Rob Scott
  • Re: ALIAS COUNT, Walt Farrell
• Re: zOS Maintenance Best Practices, Patrick Lyon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: zOS Maintenance Best Practices, Dave Danner
  • Re: zOS Maintenance Best Practices, Scott***en
• Strange MQ Issue, Jacky Bright
  • Message not available
    • Re: Strange MQ Issue, Jacky Bright
      • Re: Strange MQ Issue, Gray, Larry - Larry A
• Open z architecture and Linux questions, Kirk Wolf
  • Re: Open z architecture and Linux questions, Wayne Driscoll
    • Re: Open z architecture and Linux questions, Mark Post
  • Re: Open z architecture and Linux questions, McKown, John
  • Re: Open z architecture and Linux questions, Mark Post
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Open z architecture and Linux questions, Hall, Ken , GTI
  • Re: Open z architecture and Linux questions, Ed Finnell
  • Re: Open z architecture and Linux questions, Tony Harminc
• Redbooks - Systems Programming Series, Thompson, Steve
  • Re: Redbooks - Systems Programming Series, Grant Ward Able
  • Re: Redbooks - Systems Programming Series, George Rodriguez
  • Re: Redbooks - Systems Programming Series, Diehl, Gary , MVSSupport
  • Re: Redbooks - Systems Programming Series, Field, Alan C.
  • Re: Redbooks - Systems Programming Series, Jim McAlpine
  • Re: Redbooks - Systems Programming Series, August Carideo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Redbooks - Systems Programming Series, Doc Farmer
  • Re: Redbooks - Systems Programming Series, Stocker, Herman
    • Re: Redbooks - Systems Programming Series, Lionel B Dyck
  • Re: Redbooks - Systems Programming Series, Thompson, Steve
  • Re: Redbooks - Systems Programming Series, Thompson, Steve
• Re: Uh, oh ..., Mohammad Khan
  • Re: Uh, oh ..., Jim McAlpine
  • Re: Uh, oh ..., Howard Brazee
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Uh, oh ..., Chase, John
  • Re: Uh, oh ..., Hall, Ken , GTI
    • Re: Uh, oh ..., Rob Scott
  • Re: Uh, oh ..., , IBM Mainframe Discussion List
    • Re: Uh, oh ..., David Andrews
  • Re: Uh, oh ..., Griffin, John G
  • Re: Uh, oh ..., , IBM Mainframe Discussion List
  • Re: Uh, oh ..., Compton, John
  • Re: Uh, oh ..., Anton Britz
  • Re: Uh, oh ..., Dave Kopischke
  • Re: Uh, oh ..., Roland Schiradin
  • Re: Uh, oh ..., Santosh Kandi
• Conversion aid for ROSCOE RPF's to TSO CLISTS or TSO REXX EXECS, Hessong, Keith
  • Re: Conversion aid for ROSCOE RPF's to TSO CLISTS or TSO REXX EXECS, Cornel Stupak
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Conversion aid for ROSCOE RPF's to TSO CLISTS or TSO REXX EXECS, Thompson, Steve
    • Re: Conversion aid for ROSCOE RPF's to TSO CLISTS or TSO REXX EXECS, Robert Fake
      • Re: Conversion aid for ROSCOE RPF's to TSO CLISTS or TSO REXX EXECS, Burrell, C. Todd , CDC/OCOO/ITSO, CTR
• DFSORT stop after key, Captain Paralytic
  • Re: DFSORT stop after key, yaeger@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: DFSORT stop after key, Captain Paralytic
• zFS migration error, Niran Kamaksorn
  • Re: zFS migration error, Jim McAlpine
• Re: Change and configuration management Software Suites, Marc AGULLO
• Possible change to MCSOPER processing, W. Kevin Kelley
  • Re: Possible change to MCSOPER processing, Skip Robinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Possible change to MCSOPER processing, Brian Westerman
  • Re: Possible change to MCSOPER processing, Bruce Hewson
• Common Dataspace, Roland Schiradin
  • Re: Common Dataspace, Rob Scott
    • Re: Common Dataspace, Shane Ginnane
    • Re: Common Dataspace, Bob Shannon
      • Re: Common Dataspace, Shane
      • Re: Common Dataspace, Bob Shannon
  • Re: Common Dataspace, Wayne Driscoll
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Common Dataspace, Brian Westerman
  • Re: Common Dataspace, Roland Schiradin
    • Re: Common Dataspace, Rob Scott
  • Re: Common Dataspace, Roland Schiradin
  • Re: Common Dataspace, Roland Schiradin
    • Re: Common Dataspace, Shane
      • Re: Common Dataspace, Rob Scott
      • Uh, oh ..., Shane
      • Re: Uh, oh ..., Rob Scott
      • Re: Uh, oh ..., Ian
      • Re: Uh, oh ..., Rick Fochtman
      • Re: Uh, oh ..., Rob Scott
      • Re: Uh, oh ..., David Day
      • Re: Uh, oh ..., Rick Fochtman
      • Re: Uh, oh ..., Field, Alan C.
      • Re: Uh, oh ..., Corneel Booysen
      • Re: Uh, oh ..., howard . brazee
      • Re: Uh, oh ..., Jim McAlpine
      • Re: Common Dataspace, Shane
  • Re: Common Dataspace, Roland Schiradin
    • Re: Common Dataspace, Shane
      • Re: Common Dataspace, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Common Dataspace, Shane
      • Re: Common Dataspace, Gibney, Dave
      • ISVs and their sins: was Common Dataspace, Shane
      • Re: ISVs and their sins: was Common Dataspace, Gibney, Dave
      • Re: Common Dataspace, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Common Dataspace, Rob Scott
      • Re: Common Dataspace, Martin Packer
      • Re: Common Dataspace, Rob Scott
      • Re: Common Dataspace, Craddock, Chris
      • Re: Common Dataspace, Edward Jaffe
      • Re: Common Dataspace, Craddock, Chris
  • Re: Common Dataspace, Brian Westerman
  • Re: Common Dataspace, Keith E. Moe
    • Re: Common Dataspace, Jim Mulder
    • Re: Common Dataspace, Edward Jaffe
    • Re: Common Dataspace, Craddock, Chris
  • Re: Common Dataspace, Elpida Tzortzatos
  • Re: Common Dataspace, , IBM Mainframe Discussion List
• Re: [spam] Open z/Architecture or Not, Tom Marchant
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [spam] Open z/Architecture or Not, Ed Finnell
• TPX Acl/e Code and Dispatch, Lizette Koehler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TPX Acl/e Code and Dispatch, Mark Zelden
  • Re: TPX Acl/e Code and Dispatch, Lizette Koehler
  • Re: TPX Acl/e Code and Dispatch, Mark Zelden
  • Re: TPX Acl/e Code and Dispatch, Lizette Koehler
    • Re: TPX Acl/e Code and Dispatch, tony babonas
      • Re: TPX Acl/e Code and Dispatch (Resolved), Lizette Koehler
• CPU usage for FTP server, Chase, John
  • Re: CPU usage for FTP server, McKown, John
    • Re: CPU usage for FTP server, Chase, John
• Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD.
  • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, Chase, John
  • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, Binyamin Dissen
  • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, McKown, John
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD.
    • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, Chase, John
    • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, Kirk Wolf
    • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, Binyamin Dissen
  • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, Sebastian Welton
    • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, Chase, John
  • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD.
    • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, Jim McAlpine
  • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD.
    • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, John Giltner
  • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, Terry Sambrooks
  • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD.
    • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, Johnny Luo
      • Re: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect, Johnny Luo
• how much difference is between deploying a j2ee application in Z/Os and in windows?, legolas wood
  • Re: how much difference is between deploying a j2ee application in Z/Os and in windows?, Gray, Larry - Larry A
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: how much difference is between deploying a j2ee application in Z/Os and in windows?, Timothy Sipples
    • Re: how much difference is between deploying a j2ee application in Z/Os and in windows?, legolas wood
      • Re: how much difference is between deploying a j2ee application in Z/Os and in windows?, Gray, Larry - Larry A
      • Re: how much difference is between deploying a j2ee application in Z/Os and in windows?, legolas wood
• HFS storage efficiency query, John Compton
• 31-bit I/O macros - anyone remember when?, Greg Price
  • Re: 31-bit I/O macros - anyone remember when?, Binyamin Dissen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 31-bit I/O macros - anyone remember when?, Roland Schiradin
  • Re: 31-bit I/O macros - anyone remember when?, Greg Price
  • Re: 31-bit I/O macros - anyone remember when?, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: 31-bit I/O macros - anyone remember when?, Edward Jaffe
    • Re: 31-bit I/O macros - anyone remember when?, Binyamin Dissen
      • Re: 31-bit I/O macros - anyone remember when?, Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
  • Re: 31-bit I/O macros - anyone remember when?, Ed Finnell
• 3380 vs 3390 (was: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:( ), Greg Price
• PR: Bunch of IBM Software Announcements This Week, Timothy Sipples
• Its Great to Be Working Again, Eric Bielefeld
• FTPing of DFDSS Dump Files, Doug Evans
  • Re: FTPing of DFDSS Dump Files, Johnny Luo
    • Re: FTPing of DFDSS Dump Files, shai hess
  • Re: FTPing of DFDSS Dump Files, Gary DiPillo
  • Re: FTPing of DFDSS Dump Files, Pinnacle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FTPing of DFDSS Dump Files, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: FTPing of DFDSS Dump Files, Ed Gould
  • Re: FTPing of DFDSS Dump Files, Zaromil Tisler
  • Re: FTPing of DFDSS Dump Files, Doug Evans
  • Re: FTPing of DFDSS Dump Files, Lizette Koehler
  • FTPing of DFDSS Dump Files, Ed Long
• "Dumb Debugginging on the Mainframe", Ed Gould
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Dumb Debugginging on the Mainframe", Timothy Sipples
• OK - where is the FM to R? System REXX?, McKown, John
  • Re: OK - where is the FM to R? System REXX?, Shane
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OK - where is the FM to R? System REXX?, Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: OK - where is the FM to R? System REXX?, Shane Ginnane
  • Re: OK - where is the FM to R? System REXX?, Arthur T.
    • Re: OK - where is the FM to R? System REXX?, Jon Nolting
    • Re: OK - where is the FM to R? System REXX?, Jon Nolting
      • Re: OK - where is the FM to R? System REXX?, Shane
• Re: Punched cards was: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Patrick O'Keefe
  • Re: Punched cards was: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Bruce McKnight
  • Re: Punched cards was: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Ed Gould
    • Re: Punched cards was: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, howard . brazee
  • Re: Punched cards was: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, howard . brazee
    • Re: Punched cards was: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Chase, John
      • Re: Punched cards was: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Rick Fochtman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Punched cards was: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Paul Gilmartin
• Open z/Architecture or Not, Terry Sambrooks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Open z/Architecture or Not, Phil Payne
    • Re: [spam] Open z/Architecture or Not, R.S.
      • Re: [spam] Open z/Architecture or Not, Bob Shannon
      • Re: Open z/Architecture or Not, McKown, John
      • Re: Open z/Architecture or Not, Mark Post
      • Re: [spam] Open z/Architecture or Not, Veilleux, Jon L
      • Re: [spam] Open z/Architecture or Not, R.S.
      • Re: [spam] Open z/Architecture or Not, Veilleux, Jon L
      • Re: [spam] Open z/Architecture or Not, Ed Gould
      • Re: [spam] Open z/Architecture or Not, howard . brazee
• Re: BatchPipes Hipersocket stage?, Martin Packer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: BatchPipes Hipersocket stage?, Tom Schmidt
• Determining IMS transaction service class, Rob Wunderlich
  • Re: Determining IMS transaction service class, Staller, Allan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Determining IMS transaction service class, Rob Wunderlich
• curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY?, McKown, John
  • Re: curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY?, Pommier, Rex R.
    • Re: curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY?, McKown, John
  • Re: curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY?, R.S.
    • Re: curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY?, Pommier, Rex R.
      • Re: curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY?, McKown, John
      • Re: curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY?, R.S.
    • Re: curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY?, Bruce McKnight
      • HALT was: curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY?, Richard Peurifoy
      • Re: HALT was: curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY?, Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
      • Re: HALT was: curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY?, Maarten Slegtenhorst
    • Re: curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY? Halt-command, Maarten Slegtenhorst
  • Re: curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY?, Jim Mulder
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY?, Mark Zelden
  • Re: curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY?, Ted MacNEIL
• Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, daver++
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, daver++
    • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Pommier, Rex R.
    • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Ed Philbrook
  • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, daver++
  • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, daver++
  • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Doc Farmer
    • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Ed Gould
  • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Doc Farmer
  • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Marc Wambeke
    • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Rick Fochtman
      • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Corneel Booysen
      • 2007 Book Suggestions?, Jeffrey Deaver
    • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Chase, John
  • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Doc Farmer
  • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Marc Wambeke
• Re: Excel Question (Problem resolved), Ed. Benoit
• SYSAFF, Raquel Calvo Olmos
  • Re: SYSAFF, eBob.com
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SYSAFF, Paul Dineen
  • Re: SYSAFF, Raquel Calvo Olmos
  • Re: SYSAFF, Mark Zelden
• Re: RMM Scratch list short, Mike Wood
• Re: Batch Job to Eject Cartridge(s), Mike Wood
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Batch Job to Eject Cartridge(s), Mark Pace
• Excel Question, Ed. Benoit
  • Re: Excel Question, McKown, John
  • Re: Excel Question, Hardee, Charles H
  • Re: Excel Question, HUTCHISON Gregory
    • Re: Excel Question, HUTCHISON Gregory
  • Re: Excel Question, Hylton Tom P
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Excel Question, Ed. Benoit
  • Re: Excel Question, Big Iron
  • Re: Excel Question, Elardus Engelbrecht
  • Re: Excel Question, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Excel Question, Lizette Koehler
• CATALOG QUESTION - CISIZE, willie bunter
  • Re: CATALOG QUESTION - CISIZE, David Andrews
  • Re: CATALOG QUESTION - CISIZE, David Andrews
    • Re: CATALOG QUESTION - CISIZE, willie bunter
      • Re: CATALOG QUESTION - CISIZE, McKown, John
      • Re: CATALOG QUESTION - CISIZE, willie bunter
      • Re: CATALOG QUESTION - CISIZE, Rick Fochtman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CATALOG QUESTION - CISIZE, Ted MacNEIL
• IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Ed Gould
  • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Rick Fochtman
    • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
      • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Bernd Oppolzer
  • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Gerhard Postpischil
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Doc Farmer
    • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, howard . brazee
    • Punched cards was: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Ed Gould
    • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
  • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, McKown, John
    • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Rick Fochtman
  • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Paul Gilmartin
  • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Ed Gould
  • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Edward Jaffe
  • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Patrick O'Keefe
  • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Edward Jaffe
  • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, John P. Baker
      • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Chase, John
      • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, R.S.
  • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, John P. Baker
  • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(, Paul Gilmartin
• CTCA Device Question Under Hercules, Sergio Lima
  • Re: CTCA Device Question Under Hercules, wecmail
  • Re: CTCA Device Question Under Hercules, Sergio Lima
    • Re: CTCA Device Question Under Hercules, wecmail
• Re: IEFACTRT modifications, Elardus Engelbrecht
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IEFACTRT modifications, Rick Fochtman
• FICON FCTC, Eric Mendelson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FICON FCTC, Magen Margalit
• Re: Is there any tool or userexit of MVS console message filter ?, Brian Westerman
• No z/OS UNIX Support in System REXX?, Edward Jaffe
  • Re: No z/OS UNIX Support in System REXX?, R.S.
  • Re: No z/OS UNIX Support in System REXX?, Chase, John
  • Re: No z/OS UNIX Support in System REXX?, Edward Jaffe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: No z/OS UNIX Support in System REXX?, Bruce Hewson
  • Re: No z/OS UNIX Support in System REXX?, Magen Margalit
  • Re: No z/OS UNIX Support in System REXX?, Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: Tape/Cart drives, Ron Wells
  • Re: No z/OS UNIX Support in System REXX?, Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: No z/OS UNIX Support in System REXX?, Edward Jaffe
  • Re: No z/OS UNIX Support in System REXX?, Walt Farrell
• CSVQUERY and AMODE64, Roland Schiradin
  • Re: CSVQUERY and AMODE64, Binyamin Dissen
  • Re: CSVQUERY and AMODE64, John Sullivan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CSVQUERY and AMODE64, Roland Schiradin
  • Re: CSVQUERY and AMODE64, Roland Schiradin
  • Re: CSVQUERY and AMODE64, Peter Relson
  • Re: CSVQUERY and AMODE64, Roland Schiradin
• Using CSVINFO, David Day
  • Re: Using CSVINFO, Robert Wright
    • Re: Using CSVINFO, David Day
      • Re: Using CSVINFO, Robert Wright
      • Re: Using CSVINFO, David Day
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Using CSVINFO, Walt Farrell
    • Re: Using CSVINFO, David Day
  • Re: Using CSVINFO, Peter Relson
    • Re: Using CSVINFO, David Day
• Re: Native NTP support on Z/OS, Paul Gilmartin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Native NTP support on Z/OS, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
  • Re: Native NTP support on Z/OS, Bruce Richardson
• CATALOG ERROR, esmie moo
  • Re: CATALOG ERROR, Rob Scott
  • Re: CATALOG ERROR, McKown, John
  • Re: CATALOG ERROR, Larry Crilley
    • Re: CATALOG ERROR, esmie moo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CATALOG ERROR, Ted MacNEIL
• Re: Is there some cross reference between CPU types and machine instructions supported?, Roger Bowler
  • Is there any tool or userexit of MVS console message filter ?, Tsai Laurence
    • Re: Is there any tool or userexit of MVS console message filter ?, Field, Alan C.
    • Re: Is there any tool or userexit of MVS console message filter ?, McKown, John
• Divide the master catalog, Raquel Calvo Olmos
  • Re: Divide the master catalog, Staller, Allan
  • Re: Divide the master catalog, Hal Merritt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Divide the master catalog, Mark Zelden
    • Re: Divide the master catalog, Rugen, Len
  • Re: Divide the master catalog, Mark Zelden
    • Re: Divide the master catalog, wecmail
• Speaking of Crypto (PCI and System z), Walt Farrell
• perl daemon under OMVS - USS, physi
  • Re: perl daemon under OMVS - USS, Bill Lalonde
• Re: AXR0401I, Bob Shannon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: AXR0401I, Meir Zohar
• Money Just Doesn’t Work Any More, Clement Clarke
  • Re: Money Just Doesn’t Work Any More, Clement Clarke
    • Re: Money Just Doesn’t Work Any More, howard . brazee
  • Re: Money Just Doesn't Work Any More, Shane
    • Re: Money Just Doesn't Work Any More, Clement Clarke
  • Re: Money Just Doesn’t Work Any More, David Day
    • SV: Money Just Doesn't Work Any More, Thomas Berg
• Re: Native NTP support on Z/OS, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
  • Re: Native NTP support on Z/OS, Itschak Mugzach
    • Re: Native NTP support on Z/OS, Itschak Mugzach
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Native NTP support on Z/OS, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
    • Re: Native NTP support on Z/OS, Itschak Mugzach
  • Re: Native NTP support on Z/OS, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
  • Re: Native NTP support on Z/OS, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
• Doyle Banks/Mainline is out until 12/10/2007., Doyle Banks
• Tues, Dec 4 - Linux on System z Security - Live Virtual Class, Pamela Christina in cold and snow Endicott NY
  • Re: Tues, Dec 4 - Linux on System z Security - Live Virtual Class, Shane Ginnane
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Tues, Dec 4 - Linux on System z Security - Live Virtual Class, Paul Gilmartin
  • Tues, Dec 4 - Linux on System z Security - Live Virtual Class, Pamela Christina in cold and snowY Endicott
• GRS / ICF, Alvaro Quintupray B.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: GRS / ICF, Matthew Stitt
    • Re: GRS / ICF, Alvaro Quintupray
      • Re: GRS / ICF, Skip Robinson
• Crypto hardware performance, Patrick O'Keefe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Crypto hardware performance, Ernest Nachtigall
  • Re: Crypto hardware performance, Patrick O'Keefe
  • Re: Crypto hardware performance, Dave Jones
• IBM System z White Paper, Thompson, Steve
• Re: SMF Under VM, Staller, Allan
  • Re: SMF Under VM, Jim Mulder
• VTAM question on XCF., McKown, John
  • Re: VTAM question on XCF., Skip Robinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: VTAM question on XCF., Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: VTAM question on XCF., Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: VTAM question on XCF., pauls2272
• Re: Is CPACF enough to successfully run sample ICSF COBOL program ?, Farley, Peter x23353
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is CPACF enough to successfully run sample ICSF COBOL program ?, Farley, Peter x23353
  • Re: Is CPACF enough to successfully run sample ICSF COBOL program ?, Ernest Nachtigall
  • Re: Is CPACF enough to successfully run sample ICSF COBOL program ?, Farley, Peter x23353
• Crypto Related Posts, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Chase, John
  • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Field, Alan C.
  • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Hal Merritt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Farley, Peter x23353
  • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Jack Kelly
      • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Chase, John
      • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Ed Gould
      • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Gibney, Dave
      • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Wayne Driscoll
      • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Gibney, Dave
    • Message not available
      • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
  • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Ernest Nachtigall
  • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Bob Shannon
  • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Ernest Nachtigall
  • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Mark Zelden
  • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Walt Farrell
    • Re: Crypto Related Posts, Gibney, Dave
• Is CPACF enough to successfully run sample ICSF COBOL program?, Farley, Peter x23353
  • Re: Is CPACF enough to successfully run sample ICSF COBOL program?, R.S.
  • Re: Is CPACF enough to successfully run sample ICSF COBOL program?, pauls2272
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is CPACF enough to successfully run sample ICSF COBOL program?, Ernest Nachtigall
• Code pages (was: Square Brackets in Java?), Patrick O'Keefe
  • Re: Code pages (was: Square Brackets in Java?), Joel C. Ewing
    • Re: Code pages, Steve Comstock
• CICS Wiki news, Corneel Booysen
• Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Thompson, Steve
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Dave Kopischke
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, David Cole
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Clement Clarke
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Clement Clarke
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Ian
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Clement Clarke
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Corneel Booysen
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Ian
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Roger Bowler
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Clement Clarke
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Doc Farmer
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Lindy Mayfield
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Doc Farmer
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Van Dalsen, Herbie
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, McKown, John
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Van Dalsen, Herbie
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
      • RMM Scratch list short, Jeffrey Deaver
      • Re: RMM Scratch list short, Pinnacle
      • Re: RMM Scratch list short, Jeffrey Deaver
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Lindy Mayfield
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Van Dalsen, Herbie
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Ian
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Clement Clarke
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, R.S.
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Doc Farmer
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, McKown, John
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Chase, John
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Kirk Wolf
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Van Dalsen, Herbie
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Rick Fochtman
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Kirk Wolf
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Ron Wells
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, McKown, John
      • Re: Open Source Security Risks (was T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly), David Cole
      • Re: Open Source Security Risks (was T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly), R.S.
      • Re: Open Source Security Risks (was T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly), Clement Clarke
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Ed Gould
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Doc Farmer
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Dave Kopischke
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Tom Schmidt
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Thompson, Steve
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Van Dalsen, Herbie
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Tom Schmidt
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Doc Farmer
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Shane
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Rick Fochtman
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Paul Gilmartin
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Doc Farmer
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Mohammad Khan
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Farley, Peter x23353
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Arthur T.
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Ian
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Doc Farmer
      • Message not available
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Ian
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Rich Smrcina
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Clement Clarke
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Doc Farmer
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Ron Wells
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Thompson, Steve
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Doc Farmer
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Paul Gilmartin
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Doc Farmer
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Mark Post
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Ed Gould
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Jim Mulder
  • T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Phil Payne
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Patrick Falcone
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Roger Bowler
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Chase, John
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Clement Clarke
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Ron Wells
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Stephen Y Odo
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Thompson, Steve
  • T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Warner Mach
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Chase, John
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, McKown, John
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Jon Brock
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Ed Gould
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Roger Bowler
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Thompson, Steve
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Doc Farmer
  • T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Phil Payne
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Tony Harminc
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Clark Morris
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Doc Farmer
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Roger Bowler
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Ed Finnell
  • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Thompson, Steve
• looping JCL steps, somekool
  • Re: looping JCL steps, Bill Lalonde
• DFDSS and Copy of Offline Volumes, Kenneth R Barkhau
  • Re: DFDSS and Copy of Offline Volumes, McKown, John
  • Re: DFDSS and Copy of Offline Volumes, Joel C. Ewing
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DFDSS and Copy of Offline Volumes, Brad Carson
  • Re: DFDSS and Copy of Offline Volumes, Brian Westerman
  • Re: DFDSS and Copy of Offline Volumes, Bruce Hewson
• ATL 3590 problem, RHK HK
  • Message not available
    • Re: ATL 3590 problem, RHK HK
• Re: Acceptable Syslog Policy, Barbara Nitz
• Re: Allocating Large SYS1.HASPACE, Dennis Schaffer
  • Re: Allocating Large SYS1.HASPACE, Ulrich Krueger
• Re: IBM paper on Large Stand Alone Dump handling, Barbara Nitz
  • Re: IBM paper on Large Stand Alone Dump handling, John Ticic
  • Native NTP support on Z/OS, Itschak Mugzach
    • Re: Native NTP support on Z/OS, Pinnacle
      • Re: Native NTP support on Z/OS, Itschak Mugzach
      • Re: Native NTP support on Z/OS, R.S.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IBM paper on Large Stand Alone Dump handling, Barbara Nitz
• KSDS CA split, no CI split, R.S.
  • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, David Betten
    • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, R.S.
  • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, Larry Crilley
    • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, R.S.
      • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, Mike Bell
      • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, R.S.
      • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, Hardee, Charles H
      • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, Hardee, Charles H
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, CICS Guy
  • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, R.S.
  • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, R.S.
  • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, Gene Hudders
    • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, R.S.
  • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, CICS Guy
    • Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Ed Philbrook
      • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Steve Comstock
      • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Pommier, Rex R.
      • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Ed Philbrook
      • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Steve Comstock
      • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, August Carideo
      • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Ed Philbrook
      • Re: Anyone else see the Waffle & Dinges man on TV this morning?, Doc Farmer
  • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, R.S.
  • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, Ted MacNEIL
  • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, R.S.
  • Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split, Gene Hudders
• TSO - Automatic notify messages after log on, Angel Tamayo
  • Re: TSO - Automatic notify messages after log on, Ulrich Krueger
  • Re: TSO - Automatic notify messages after log on, Itschak Mugzach
    • Re: TSO - Automatic notify messages after log on, Angel Tamayo
  • Message not available
    • Re: TSO - Automatic notify messages after log on, Angel Tamayo
      • Re: TSO - Automatic notify messages after log on, Field, Alan C.
      • Re: TSO - Automatic notify messages after log on, Angel Tamayo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TSO - Automatic notify messages after log on, Tom Schmidt
    • Re: TSO - Automatic notify messages after log on, Angel Tamayo
      • Re: TSO - Automatic notify messages after log on, Ulrich Krueger
      • Message not available
      • Re: TSO - Automatic notify messages after log on, Angel Tamayo
  • Re: TSO - Automatic notify messages after log on, Tom Schmidt
  • Re: TSO - Automatic notify messages after log on, Walt Farrell
    • Re: TSO - Automatic notify messages after log on, Angel Tamayo
• Re: Shark CCWS is now supported by MFNetDisk and much better MVS and pcserver code., Shai Hess
• Copy replacing without pseudo code, Amlan Prasad
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Copy replacing without pseudo code, Roland Schiradin
  • Fw: Copy replacing without pseudo code, Bill Klein
    • Re: Copy replacing without pseudo code, Ed Gould
  • Re: Copy replacing without pseudo code, Amlan Prasad
  • Fw: Copy replacing without pseudo code, Bill Klein
    • Re: Fw: Copy replacing without pseudo code, Don Leahy
      • Re: Fw: Copy replacing without pseudo code, Clark F Morris
      • Re: Copy replacing without pseudo code, Ed Gould
  • Re: Copy replacing without pseudo code, Lynd, Eugene , Contractor, J6C
  • Re: Copy replacing without pseudo code, Roland Schiradin
• Re: SMCS ... was something else entirely., Bruce Hewson
  • Re: SMCS ... was something else entirely., R.S.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SMCS ... was something else entirely., Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: SMCS ... was something else entirely., R.S.
      • Re: SMCS ... was something else entirely., Skip Robinson
      • Re: SMCS ... was something else entirely., R.S.
  • Re: SMCS ... was something else entirely., Patrick O'Keefe
  • Re: SMCS ... was something else entirely., Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: SMCS ... was something else entirely., R.S.
  • Re: SMCS ... was something else entirely., Patrick O'Keefe
  • Re: SMCS ... was something else entirely., Ted MacNEIL
• Re: Why isn't OMVS command integrated with ISPF?, Don Leahy
  • Re: Why isn't OMVS command integrated with ISPF?, Chase, John
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why isn't OMVS command integrated with ISPF?, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: Why isn't OMVS command integrated with ISPF?, Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
      • Re: Why isn't OMVS command integrated with ISPF?, Don Leahy
  • Re: Why isn't OMVS command integrated with ISPF?, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: Why isn't OMVS command integrated with ISPF?, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: Why isn't OMVS command integrated with ISPF?, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
  • Re: Why isn't OMVS command integrated with ISPF?, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
• Re: Are any of this deperate, redux..., kh
• Re: IBM preannounces next IBMLink failure, Clark F Morris
  • Re: IBM preannounces next IBMLink failure, Ed Gould
• More on - MS Invests in PSI, Ed Gould
• CPACF vs CEx2, Patrick O'Keefe
  • Re: CPACF vs CEx2, Edward Jaffe
  • Re: CPACF vs CEx2, Chase, John
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CPACF vs CEx2, Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: CPACF vs CEx2, R.S.
  • Re: CPACF vs CEx2, Patrick O'Keefe
    • Re: CPACF vs CEx2, Chase, John
  • Re: CPACF vs CEx2, Ernest Nachtigall
• Re: Formal requests (was Installing/Updating SVC), Binyamin Dissen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Formal requests (was Installing/Updating SVC), Bill Klein
• Re: SMP/E RECEIVE AND FROMNTS, Roland Schiradin
  • Re: SMP/E RECEIVE AND FROMNTS, Gray, Larry - Larry A
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SMP/E RECEIVE AND FROMNTS, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: SMP/E RECEIVE AND FROMNTS, Gray, Larry - Larry A
  • Re: SMP/E RECEIVE AND FROMNTS, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: SMP/E RECEIVE AND FROMNTS, Skip Robinson
    • Re: SMP/E RECEIVE AND FROMNTS, Gray, Larry - Larry A
  • Re: SMP/E RECEIVE AND FROMNTS, Paul Gilmartin
    • Re: SMP/E RECEIVE AND FROMNTS, Skip Robinson
      • Re: SMP/E RECEIVE AND FROMNTS, Ed Gould
• OT: Manual Humor, Pinnacle
• Re: Starting ICSF - CSFM101E, Pierre Fichaud
• Codepages, Steve Comstock
  • Re: Codepages, Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Codepages, Patrick O'Keefe
• Re: Are comments possible in IEBUPDTE SYSIN?, Paul Gilmartin
• Re: Square Brackets in Java?, Joel C. Ewing
  • Re: Square Brackets in Java?, Steve Comstock
    • Re: Square Brackets in Java?, Joel C. Ewing
• Re: Data Center Theft, Ed Gould
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Data Center Theft, R.S.
  • Re: Data Center Theft, Timothy Sipples
    • Re: Data Center Theft, Ed Gould
  • Re: Data Center Theft, Timothy Sipples
• Re: Anyone remember "DARDUMP"?, Ed Gould
  • T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, David Cole
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Shane
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, David Day
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, David Cole
      • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, howard . brazee
    • Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly, Van Dalsen, Herbie
  • Re: Anyone remember "DARDUMP"?, Bill Wilkie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Anyone remember "DARDUMP"?, Rick Fochtman
    • Re: Anyone remember "DARDUMP"?, Ed Gould
  • Re: Anyone remember "DARDUMP"?, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.
• Looking for Fortran-load modules to analyze, Roland Schiradin
• Re: z800 to z9, Shane
  • Re: z800 to z9, Pommier, Rex R.
  • Re: z800 to z9, Gibney, Dave
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: z800 to z9, Ted MacNEIL
    • Re: z800 to z9, Pommier, Rex R.
  • Re: z800 to z9, Brian Westerman
  • Re: z800 to z9, Patty Mabie
  • Re: z800 to z9, Timothy Sipples
    • Re: z800 to z9, Patrick Falcone

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Comp  > bit.listserv.ibm-main  > 2007-12