Re: Health CHECK(IBMVSM,VSM_PVT_LIMIT)/VSM_SQA_THRESHOLD
- From: mark.zelden@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Mark Zelden)
- Date: 28 Sep 2007 07:06:25 -0700
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:15:20 +0200, Barbara Nitz <nitz-ibm@xxxxxxx> wrote:
one-time-expected change I should not be required to override a lot of checks.
You can override the severity of the check, IIRC. But for this
In a perfect world, perhaps.
You don't *have to* override anything. It's also a one time action to
deactivate the check or delete it with a simple line command on SDSF.
Since it only applies to something that changed at IPL time, the next
IPL will be okay and there is no exposure to leaving it inactive for
the duration of this IPL.
I wouldn't say it... but some might argue it's a good thing that it trips
as "evidence" of your change. I have other tools that I would use to
verify the change did what I expected... but not everyone has or
knows how to use those other tools, so I still don't mind this one
(and other similar checks) getting tripped and then just deleting it.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:mark.zelden@xxxxxxxxxxxx
z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
- Prev by Date: Re: How to restrict JCL statement Parms
- Next by Date: Re: Change in IBM's mainframe strategy
- Previous by thread: Re: Health CHECK(IBMVSM,VSM_PVT_LIMIT)/VSM_SQA_THRESHOLD
- Next by thread: Health Checker NOCHECK parm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
