Re: DFSMSDSS RESTORE Error
- From: darth.keller@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 31 Aug 2007 07:49:04 -0700
To answer the part of your question about the lock position, the tape
lock position doesn't matter when you're trying to read (recover) a
dataset from the tape. It isn't actually a tape lock, it is a
read/write lock - if it is set in the lock position, you can't write
anything new to the tape. It doesn't lock the tape from reading.
Which begs the question as to why we call it a read/write lock instead of
a write lock.
**************************************************************************************
This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, forwarding or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message and all copies and backups thereof.
Thank you.
**************************************************************************************
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DFSMSDSS RESTORE Error
- From: Pommier, Rex R.
- RE: DFSMSDSS RESTORE Error
- From: Pommier, Rex R.
- Re: DFSMSDSS RESTORE Error
- References:
- Re: DFSMSDSS RESTORE Error
- From: Pommier, Rex R.
- Re: DFSMSDSS RESTORE Error
- Prev by Date: Re: DFSMSDSS RESTORE Error
- Next by Date: RE: ISPF FREED SYS1.PARMLIB
- Previous by thread: Re: DFSMSDSS RESTORE Error
- Next by thread: RE: DFSMSDSS RESTORE Error
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|