Re: Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- From: edjaffe@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Edward Jaffe)
- Date: 30 May 2007 10:40:09 -0700
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
:>In my experience, excessive switching of addressing mode is quite :>expensive. I suspect it's because the entire pipeline must be flushed.
I didn't see that in the POPs.
AFAIK, the Principles of Operation does not discuss processor pipeline considerations for any instruction. There is some cursory information here and there regarding instruction prefetch. That's about it.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
edjaffe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- From: Binyamin Dissen
- Re: Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- References:
- Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- From: Binyamin Dissen
- Re: Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- From: Edward Jaffe
- Re: Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- From: Binyamin Dissen
- Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- Prev by Date: RE: Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- Next by Date: Re: Counting occurrences of a string in loadlib
- Previous by thread: RE: Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|