RE: Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- From: jeffrey_smith@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Jeffrey D. Smith)
- Date: 30 May 2007 10:39:47 -0700
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 11:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
On Wed, 30 May 2007 09:45:04 -0700 Edward Jaffe
<edjaffe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
:>Binyamin Dissen wrote:
:>> Is there much of a cost to switching amodes?
:>> Is it worth writing code to be able to run completely in 64 bit mode
(and
:>> maintain the top half of the registers) or is it fine to switch in and
out
:>> when referencing storage above the bar?
:>> POPs does not indicate anything.
:>In my experience, excessive switching of addressing mode is quite
:>expensive. I suspect it's because the entire pipeline must be flushed.
I didn't see that in the POPs.
--
Binyamin Dissen <bdissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
A pipe-line flush is usually indicated quite clearly in the PoPs as
a "checkpoint synchronization" operation.
My PC routines usually set AMODE(64) quite early (after testing FLCARCH)
and stay in AM64, unless a system service, like SETFRR, requires AM31.
Saving and restoring AM64 is quite painless with the linkage stack
(BAKR,PR) instructions.
The LLGT, LLGTR instructions are quite useful for purifying "dirty"
31-bit pointers.
If you already have "clean" 31-bit pointers, then using LA Rx,0 is
an easy way to clear the entire 64-bit register before loading the
full word pointer. This paradigm provides backward compatibility to
older 31-bit machines.
Using these techniques, my mainline PC routine code runs in AM64
or AM31 without much dual-pathing. Only the entry logic does some
simple tests and cleans pointers. The remainder of the routine works
correctly in either AM31 or AM64 without any further dual-pathing.
Good luck.
Jeffrey D. Smith
Principal Product Architect
Farsight Systems Corporation
700 KEN PRATT BLVD. #204-159
LONGMONT, CO 80501-6452
303-774-9381 direct
303-484-6170 FAX
http://www.farsight-systems.com/
see my résumé at my website (yes, I am looking for employment)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
- References:
- Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- From: Binyamin Dissen
- Re: Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- From: Edward Jaffe
- Re: Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- From: Binyamin Dissen
- Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- Next by Date: Re: Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there a cost in switching AMODEs?
- Index(es):