Re: SNA crackable?
- From: mstitt@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Matthew Stitt)
- Date: 30 Aug 2006 10:49:23 -0700
We've always considered SNA to be the most reliable and secure networking
system created. But that was in the days of leased lines, and modems
connected directly to the circuits and the FEPs.
With everything running through devices which can be accessed through the
network, SNA (and everything else) is now vulnerable as was pointed out.
The article (and the presenter (presumably)) centered on SNA, but I'm sure
any protocol (or data traffic) is vulnerable using his methods.
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:31:31 -0700, Ray Mullins <mrm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Interesting article on the SearchDataCenter site today...
http://tinyurl.com/juuee
Could SNA be cracked? (Note the proper word use here. Hackers do not do
bad. Crackers do bad.)
Later,
Ray
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SNA crackable?
- From: John Sawyer
- Re: SNA crackable?
- From: Mickey
- Re: SNA crackable?
- Prev by Date: RE: Question About LIKE Parm
- Next by Date: OMVS VIRTUAL old news bigger LPARs interesting results
- Previous by thread: SNA crackable?
- Next by thread: Re: SNA crackable?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
