RE: RACF Structure and Performance
- From: KEVIN_FLETCHER@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Fletcher, Kevin)
- Date: 28 Feb 2006 12:33:44 -0800
Alan,
We did this years ago and found no appreciable performance difference.
It did improve our security adminstration as there was only one point of
maintenance. As always depending on your setup UMMV.
Thanks,
Fletch 817-3545
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Behalf Of Alan Schwartz
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 2:43 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RACF Structure and Performance
We're looking at merging two RACF databases. As part of our initial
analysis we are interested in placing RACF into a coupling facility.
We
are curious about changes in RACF performance using the structures.
Better? Worse? No appreciable difference? Are there any published
documents discussing this?
Alan Schwartz
Assurant Shared Business Services
Lead Systems Programmer
Phone: 651-361-4758
Fax: 651-361-5625
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
- Prev by Date: Re: IEE345I command authority error from batch
- Next by Date: RMF Mon III Reports
- Previous by thread: Re: RACF Structure and Performance
- Next by thread: RMF Mon III Reports
- Index(es):