Re: Fw: Tax chooses dead language - Austalia
- From: R.Skorupka@xxxxxxxxxxxx (R.S.)
- Date: 28 Feb 2006 02:44:37 -0800
Bill Klein wrote:
I assume you saw the paragraph,
"Under questioning from Senator Fielding, Mr Farr agreed the local project
was based on old technology, "but it is still very widely used for large
mainframe applications". "
Any guess about what the author of this article things about THAT platform
(he asked IBM-MAIN)?
P.S. I assume *I* am the "Bill" you were talking about.
P.P.S. Any news writer who spells it "Cobol" shows how knowledgeable they
are about the language.
Is it really so important ? I've seen Cics, Db2, spelled by the administrators. Bad or good ones, but for sure they know the product names. Just they don't care or allow MS Word to "correct" the words.
BTW: Isn't COBOL the most primitive language in use ? OK, I assume Basic (BASIC ?) is not in use. Isn't COBOL unpopular on other platforms ?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fw: Tax chooses dead language - Austalia
- From: howard . brazee
- Re: [IBM-MAIN] Fw: Tax chooses dead language - Austalia
- From: Steve Flynn
- Re: Fw: Tax chooses dead language - Austalia
- References:
- Fw: Tax chooses dead language - Austalia
- From: Bill Klein
- Fw: Tax chooses dead language - Austalia
- Prev by Date: Fw: Tax chooses dead language - Austalia
- Next by Date: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Fw: Tax chooses dead language - Austalia
- Previous by thread: Fw: Tax chooses dead language - Austalia
- Next by thread: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Fw: Tax chooses dead language - Austalia
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|