WebSphere/HATS Odyssey



I was in one of the many meetings that still go on, although our WAS 5
conversion is basically on hold pending an upgrade, and heard that WAS V5
is not 64 bit compliant. I guess I was asleep at the wheel to some extent
but this poses some concern from my perspective when we do get an upgrade.

Basically my concern is that we have quite a few HATS related
applications, 26 and counting and currently running on NT, that will run
as part of one of our cell groups as part of the WAS V5 conversion. With
that said and with the 31 bit limitation my concerns are with populating
the application servants with fewer applications than we may have hoped
for. This will mean more servants with less applications per servant which
means more storage and more CPU. I confess that I have not RTFM, can
anyone confirm that WAS tasks have a 2 gb address space limit. WHAT, is
the cart before the horse again!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: WebSphere/HATS Odyssey
    ... >conversion is basically on hold pending an upgrade, ... >but this poses some concern from my perspective when we do get an upgrade. ... >the application servants with fewer applications than we may have hoped ... This would be a great patch for a shop with a production problem. ...
    (bit.listserv.ibm-main)
  • Re: How to put graphics on envelopes?
    ... You make a compelling arguement to do the upgrade that would include ... Also Word has formatting at various levels, ... Here is some general info on moving from Word Perfect to Word: ... Conversion back to Word Perfect: There is a problem (in addition to the ...
    (microsoft.public.word.docmanagement)
  • Re: I WANT MY FP2000 BACK
    ... Once you upgraded did you download and install Office 2003 Service Pack 1, ... There IS a cavalier attitude here. ... >> Alex, ... >> conflicts with other applications. ...
    (microsoft.public.frontpage.client)
  • Re: Upgrade ME to XP
    ... I can put back the EXACT same applications ... you are creating a brand-new installation ... upgrade results in a problem-free installation. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Still having Web Page Pathing Problems / Relative Links show N
    ... > Yeah well if you can't dazzle them with your applications knowledge, ... even though it's been there since at least PPT 2000. ... and the HTML source after the .ppt has by converted by Save As Web Page: ... conversion I never use the resulting xml folder only the .htm file itself. ...
    (microsoft.public.powerpoint)